Wiring the Past: A Network Science Perspective on the Challenge of Archeological Similarity Networks

Nowadays, it is a common knowledge that scholars from different disciplines, regardless of the specificities of their research domains, can find in network science a valuable ally when tackling complexity. However, there are many difficulties that may arise, starting from the process of mapping a system onto a network which is not by any means a trivial step. This paper deals with those issues inherent to the specific challenge of building a network from archaeological data, focusing in particular on networks of archaeological contexts. More specifically, we address technical difficulties faced when constructing networks of contexts or sites where past interactions are inferred based on some kind of similarity between the corresponding assemblages (Archaeological Similarity Networks or ASN). We propose a basic characterization in formal terms of ASN as a well defined class of networks with its own specific features. Throughout the paper, we devote special attention to the problem of quantifying the similarity between sites, especially in relation with the ubiquitous issues of data incompleteness and the reliability of the inferred ties. We argue that, generally speaking, human past studies are quite disconnected from the rest of interdisciplinary applications of network science and that this prevent this field from fully exploiting the potential of such methods. Our goal is to give hints about which are the interesting questions that archaeological applications put on the table of networks scientists

[1]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[2]  Carl Knappett,et al.  Network analysis in archaeology : new approaches to regional interaction , 2013 .

[3]  Emma Blake 9 Social Networks, Path Dependence, and the Rise of Ethnic Groups in pre-Roman Italy , 2013 .

[4]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[6]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[7]  Mark Golitko,et al.  Complexities of collapse: the evidence of Maya obsidian as revealed by social network graphical analysis , 2012, Antiquity.

[8]  K. H. Lee,et al.  The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: nerve growth factor signaling , 2004, Physical biology.

[9]  P. Jaccard Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines , 1901 .

[10]  George W. Brainerd The Place of Chronological Ordering in Archaeological Analysis , 1951 .

[11]  Mark Golitko,et al.  Procurement and Distribution of Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican Obsidian 900 BC–AD 1520: a Social Network Analysis , 2015 .

[12]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Claire Lemercier,et al.  Formal network methods in history: why and how? , 2015 .

[14]  Pablo M. Gleiser,et al.  Community Structure in Jazz , 2003, Adv. Complex Syst..

[15]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[16]  A. Díaz-Guilera,et al.  Efficiency of informational transfer in regular and complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Tom Brughmans,et al.  CONNECTING THE DOTS: TOWARDS ARCHAEOLOGICAL NETWORK ANALYSIS , 2010 .

[18]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Analyzing Affiliation Networks , 2011 .

[19]  William Engelbrecht,et al.  Northern Iroquoian Ethnic Evolution: A Social Network Analysis , 2012 .

[20]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[21]  W. S. Robinson A Method for Chronologically Ordering Archaeological Deposits , 1951, American Antiquity.

[22]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Petter Holme,et al.  Network bipartivity. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Søren M. Sindbæk,et al.  Networks and nodal points: the emergence of towns in early Viking Age Scandinavia , 2007, Antiquity.

[25]  Barbara J. Mills,et al.  Are Social Networks Survival Networks? An Example from the Late Pre-Hispanic US Southwest , 2015 .

[26]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[27]  John M. Roberts,et al.  To binarize or not to binarize: relational data and the construction of archaeological networks , 2013 .

[28]  Søren M. Sindbæk,et al.  4 Broken Links and Black Boxes: Material Affiliations and Contextual Network Synthesis in the Viking World , 2013 .

[29]  Shawn Graham,et al.  Networks, Agent-Based Models and the Antonine Itineraries: Implications for Roman Archaeology , 2006 .

[30]  Barbara J. Mills,et al.  Networks in Archaeology: Phenomena, Abstraction, Representation , 2015 .

[31]  Koji Mizoguchi,et al.  Nodes and edges: A network approach to hierarchisation and state formation in Japan , 2009 .

[32]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[33]  Fiona Coward 11 Grounding the Net: Social Networks, Material Culture and Geography in the Epipalaeolithic and Early Neolithic of the Near East (~21,000–6,000 cal bce) , 2013 .

[34]  Barbara J. Mills,et al.  Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Matthew A. Peeples,et al.  Brokerage and Social Capital in the Prehispanic U.S. Southwest , 2013 .

[36]  Why Pearson's r is Not a Good Similarity Coefficient for Comparing Collections , 1990, American Antiquity.

[37]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Fiona Coward,et al.  Small Worlds, Material Culture and Ancient Near Eastern Social Networks , 2009 .

[39]  Henrik Gerding,et al.  Network analysis of archaeological data: a systematic approach , 2014 .

[40]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[41]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Extending Centrality , 2005 .

[42]  F. Radicchi,et al.  Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Mark Buchanan,et al.  Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks , 2002 .

[44]  Claire Lemercier Taking time seriously , 2015 .

[45]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[46]  Henrik Gerding,et al.  The Diffusion of Fired Bricks in Hellenistic Europe: A Similarity Network Analysis , 2015 .

[47]  LAIRE,et al.  Taking time seriously How do we deal with change in historical networks ? , 2014 .

[48]  Koji Mizoguchi 7 The Evolution of Prestige Good Systems: an Application of Network Analysis to the Transformation of Communication Systems and their Media , 2013 .

[49]  Tom Brughmans,et al.  Thinking Through Networks: A Review of Formal Network Methods in Archaeology , 2012, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.