Collaboration Technology Support for Knowledge Conversion in Virtual Teams: A Theoretical Perspective

Collaboration technologies (CTs) are making it feasible for organizations to rapidly bring together dispersed Corkers into virtual teams that perform a variety of tasks. Group support systems (GSS) are a type of CT that is often deployed to facilitate virtual team operations, which typically involve an exchange of knowledge among team members. This paper builds on Nonaka's theory of organizational knowledge creation, and other research, to present a theoretical framework that links the factors that are most relevant to knowledge conversion in GSS-aided virtual teams. The paper advances some research propositions that suggest a positive contribution of GSS to knowledge conversion and the levels of shared understanding and performance that could emerge in virtual teams. In addition, the propositions indicate positive relationships between member perceptions of the virtual work environment, their willingness to share knowledge, and the processes of knowledge conversion in those teams

[1]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Going Virtual: The Driving Forces and Arrangements , 2001 .

[2]  Marie Christine Roy,et al.  Electronic Group Brainstorming , 1996 .

[3]  Michael Parent,et al.  Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[4]  M. Diehl,et al.  Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming? , 2000 .

[5]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[6]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[11]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Computer-Mediated Inter-Organizational Knowledge-Sharing: Insights from a Virtual Team Innovating Using a Collaborative Tool , 2000, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[12]  Yoel Yinon,et al.  Intergroup Conflict Management Strategies as Related to Perceptions of Dual Identity and Separate Groups , 2004, The Journal of social psychology.

[13]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[14]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[15]  HoeglMartin,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[16]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  P. Lappalainen,et al.  A method of measuring the efficiency of the knowledge utilization process , 1998 .

[18]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[19]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  FOSTERING INTRANET KNOWLEDGE- SHARING: AN INTEGRATION OF TRANSACTIVE MEMORY AND PUBLIC GOODS APPROACHES , 2001 .

[21]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[22]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[23]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[24]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[26]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[27]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Believing Is Seeing: Joint Ventures and Organization Learning* , 1995 .

[28]  Lynda M. Applegate,et al.  Knowledge sharing practices and technology use norms in dispersed development teams , 2000, ICIS.

[29]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[30]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[32]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[34]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[35]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[37]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[39]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[40]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[41]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[42]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[43]  J. Dutton,et al.  Advances in strategic management , 1994 .

[44]  D. Tjosvold.  Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. , 1998 .

[45]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  Group decision‐making as a structurational process , 1985 .

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[47]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[48]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  Project teams: profiles and member perceptions-implications for group support system research and products , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  R. Duncan.  Organizational Learning : Implications for organizational design , 1979 .

[50]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Tasks matter: modeling group task processes in experimental CSCW research , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[51]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[52]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[53]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[54]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[55]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[56]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[57]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Developing complex group products: Idea combination in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).