What Do People Affected by Cancer Think About Electronic Health Information Exchange? Results From the 2010 LIVESTRONG Electronic Health Information Exchange Survey and the 2008 Health Information National Trends Survey.

PURPOSE The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act has placed an emphasis on electronic health information exchange (EHIE). Research on needs of patient, especially those touched by cancer, has been sparse. Here, we present data on preferences for EHIE among those touched by cancer compared with a nationally representative sample of American adults. METHODS TWO SURVEYS WERE USED: an online survey designed by LIVESTRONG (the Lance Armstrong Foundation) and a dual-frame, nationally representative sample of adults collected through the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). RESULTS The LIVESTRONG EHIE survey yielded a sample of 8,411 respondents, including 433 currently receiving cancer treatment, 298 living with cancer as a chronic disease, 2,343 post-treatment survivors, and 5,337 with no history of cancer. The HINTS sample consisted of 7,674 respondents representative of the general adult population. Comparisons revealed a strong positive view of the value of EHIE within the cancer-relevant groups, especially among those living with cancer as a chronic disease. Only about half of the general population showed a similar degree of enthusiasm for EHIE. When asked about specific functions for EHRs, respondents valued privacy and security above all, followed by improving care coordination and data sharing between providers. CONCLUSION These data suggest that the EHIE needs among those touched by cancer may be greater than in the general population. This is particularly important because people affected by cancer are among those who access our health care system most frequently and who have the most at stake.

[1]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  eHealth research from the user's perspective. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  K. Oeffinger,et al.  Models for delivering survivorship care. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Tejal K. Gandhi,et al.  Implementing practice-linked pre-visit electronic journals in primary care: patient and physician use and satisfaction , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): Development, Design, and Dissemination , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[5]  Bradford W Hesse,et al.  Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[6]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Don E. Detmer,et al.  Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  S. Woolf,et al.  A vision for patient-centered health information systems. , 2011, JAMA.

[9]  W. Chou,et al.  Social Media Use in the United States: Implications for Health Communication , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Information technology comes to medicine. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Moser,et al.  Surveys of physicians and electronic health information. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Angela DeMichele,et al.  Adult Cancer Survivorship: Evolution, Research, and Planning Care , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  Donald W. Simborg,et al.  Consumer empowerment versus consumer populism in healthcare IT , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  J. Rowland,et al.  Cancer survivors and survivorship research: a reflection on today's successes and tomorrow's challenges. , 2008, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.