Community, the very idea!: perspectives of participants in a demand-side community energy project

Although community action on energy is now championed by both government and grassroots actors, it has a more ambiguous place in social science commentaries. While the strengths of community action are often said to lie in its collective, local and independent nature, evocations of power relations and conflict are also often present in social science analyses of community-owned renewables schemes. In this brief paper, we examine the meanings of community and community action from the perspective of participants in a demand-side community energy project. Understanding these meanings – particularly the ways they might differ from those in mainstream discourses and in work on the supply-side – is an important issue for policy and practice. Smart Communities was a demand-side, community action project on energy consumption reduction (2011-2013). Drawing on the principles of action research, our analysis is based upon 35 interviews with project participants and experiences during the project action. In Smart Communities, some familiar ambiguities emerged around the collective connotations of community. However, the notions of a local and non-commercial project were widely valued by participants; in particular, these rendered the project more authentic and trustworthy. Particularly in the context of demand-side action in which widespread local participation is important, these findings suggest that there is value in policy-makers and grassroots practitioners engaging with the nuanced reality of community and community action. In addition, the findings raise questions about the UK government’s vision for greater commercial collaboration in community energy, and the central role of the private sector in other energy demand reduction policies (such as the Green Deal and the Smart Meter roll-out).

[1]  G. Aiken.  (Local-) community for global challenges: carbon conversations, transition towns and governmental elisions , 2015 .

[2]  P. D. Dunn,et al.  Appropriate Technology: Technology with a Human Face , 1979 .

[3]  M. Peters,et al.  Community action a force for social change? Some conceptual observations. Resolve Working Paper Series, 01-08, University of Surrey. , 2008 .

[4]  Gabriel Chanan.  Local community involvement: A handbook for good practice , 1999 .

[5]  Kevin Burchell,et al.  Working together to save energy? Report of the Smart Communities project , 2014 .

[6]  R. Pahl.  Are all Communities Communities in the Mind? , 2005 .

[7]  L. Middlemiss,et al.  Influencing individual sustainability: a review of the evidence on the role of community-based organisations , 2008 .

[8]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development , 2013 .

[9]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[10]  Steven M. Hoffman,et al.  From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program , 2010 .

[11]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy , 2010 .

[12]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[13]  A. Lovins.  Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken? , 1976 .

[14]  Gp Taylor-Aiken.  (Local-) community for global challenges: carbon conversations, transition towns and governmental elisions , 2014 .

[15]  J. Mccarthy.  Devolution in the Woods: Community Forestry as Hybrid Neoliberalism , 2005 .

[16]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[17]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes: The Politics and Perceptions of Community Benefit Provision in Renewable Energy Development in the UK , 2010 .

[18]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of its Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development , 2005 .

[19]  Gordon Walker,et al.  The role for ‘community’ in carbon governance , 2011 .

[20]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[21]  L. Middlemiss,et al.  The effects of community-based action for sustainability on participants' lifestyles , 2011 .

[22]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[23]  G. Crow.  REPORT : Conceptualisations and meanings of “ community ” : the theory and operationalisation of a contested concept , 2012 .

[24]  Tony Blackshaw,et al.  The Symbolic Construction of Community , 2010 .

[25]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .

[26]  E. F. Schumacher,et al.  Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered , 1974 .

[27]  Anastasios Papafragkou,et al.  Beyond the Activist Ghetto: A Deductive Blockmodelling Approach to Understanding the Relationship between Contact with Environmental Organisations and Public Attitudes and Behaviour , 2014 .