A Humanlike Predictor of Facial Attractiveness

This work presents a method for estimating human facial attractiveness, based on supervised learning techniques. Numerous facial features that describe facial geometry, color and texture, combined with an average human attractiveness score for each facial image, are used to train various predictors. Facial attractiveness ratings produced by the final predictor are found to be highly correlated with human ratings, markedly improving previous machine learning achievements. Simulated psychophysical experiments with virtually manipulated images reveal preferences in the machine's judgments which are remarkably similar to those of humans. These experiments shed new light on existing theories of facial attractiveness such as the averageness, smoothness and symmetry hypotheses. It is intriguing to find that a machine trained explicitly to capture an operational performance criteria such as attractiveness rating, implicitly captures basic human psychophysical biases characterizing the perception of facial attractiveness in general.

[1]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? , 1987 .

[3]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[4]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[5]  A.J O'Toole,et al.  3D shape and 2D surface textures of human faces: the role of "averages" in attractiveness and age , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Facial Attractiveness: Beauty and the Machine , 2006, Neural Computation.

[7]  A. Møller,et al.  Asymmetry, Developmental Stability, and Evolution , 1998 .

[8]  Dahlia W. Zaidel,et al.  She is not a beauty even when she smiles: Possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Phunny Stuph.

[11]  F. Galton Composite Portraits, Made by Combining Those of Many Different Persons Into a Single Resultant Figure. , 1879 .

[12]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Nature Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom: The Multiple Ways and Wherefores of Attractiveness , 2002 .

[13]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. , 2002 .

[14]  Michael R. Cunningham,et al.  Dimensions of facial physical attractiveness: The intersection of biology and culture. , 2002 .

[15]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[16]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[17]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[18]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. , 2002 .

[19]  C. Ingleby Composite Portraits , 1885, Nature.

[20]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .