A Multi-Criteria Structure for Sustainable Implementation of Urban Distribution Centers in Historical Cities

This paper proposes a structure for sustainable implementation of urban distribution centers (UDCs) in historical cities, considering the opinion of the main stakeholders involved in the urban distribution of goods and a set of additional criteria. Based on a survey that was conducted among carriers, traffic wardens, and retailers, a decision hierarchy structure, consisting of the relevant criteria evaluated by various statistical techniques, will be used for sustainable implementation of UDCs. The methodology uses a database collected in the historical center of Ouro Preto, a Brazilian city which contains common characteristics of other Latin American and some European cities that are included in the World Heritage List. This structure is unique, as it is based on a survey among the main stakeholders, and can be applied by logistics operators and local authorities for implementing UDCs to address urban distribution issues, especially in historical cities. However, without loss of generality, the proposed methodology can be adopted for different cities using the appropriate criteria according to the characteristics of the cities.

[1]  Ziyou Gao,et al.  Logistics distribution centers location problem and algorithm under fuzzy environment , 2007 .

[2]  Ming Li,et al.  A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach Based on Fuzzy Theory and Credibility Mechanism for Logistics Center Location Selection , 2014, WHICEB.

[3]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  A Road Network for Freight Transport in Flanders: Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Assessment of Alternative Ring Ways , 2013 .

[4]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning , 2012 .

[5]  P. C. C. Ribeiro,et al.  Urban distribution centres in historical cities from the perspective of residents, retailers and carriers , 2019, Research in Transportation Economics.

[6]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[7]  Xiaokun Wang,et al.  Decision-Making Process for Developing Urban Freight Consolidation Centers: Analysis with Experimental Economics , 2014 .

[8]  Jesús Muñuzuri,et al.  New challenges for urban consolidation centres: A case study in The Hague , 2010 .

[9]  Pranab K. Dan,et al.  Multi criteria decision making methods for location selection of distribution centers , 2013 .

[10]  Julian Allen,et al.  Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form , 2012 .

[11]  Svetlana Nikoličić,et al.  DIFFERENT URBAN CONSOLIDATION CENTRE SCENARIOS: IMPACT ON EXTERNAL COSTS OF LAST-MILE DELIVERIES , 2018, Transport.

[12]  Diego Armando Soto-de la Vega,et al.  Metodología para localización de centros de distribución a través de análisis multicriterio y optimización , 2014 .

[13]  Michela Le Pira,et al.  Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[14]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport , 2004 .

[15]  S. K. Goyal,et al.  A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[16]  J.H.R. van Duin,et al.  Understanding Financial Viability of Urban Consolidation Centres: Regent Street (London), Bristol/Bath & Nijmegen , 2016 .

[17]  Julian Allen,et al.  Urban freight consolidation centres: final report , 2005 .

[18]  Antonio Chamorro‐Mera,et al.  Reverse Logistics and Urban Logistics: Making a Link , 2019, Sustainability.

[19]  D. Paddeu,et al.  Shaping Urban Freight Systems via a Participatory Approach to Inform Policy-Making , 2020, Sustainability.

[20]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[21]  Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu,et al.  Sono sostenibili le soluzioni di City Logistics? Il caso di CityPorto (Italia) Are City Logistics Solutions Sustainable? The Cityporto case , 2010 .

[22]  José Geraldo Vidal Vieira,et al.  How logistics performance of freight operators is affected by urban freight distribution issues , 2015 .

[23]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Multi-criteria Analysis as a Tool to Include Stakeholders in Project Evaluation: The MAMCA Method , 2007 .

[24]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking , 1996 .

[25]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective , 2002 .

[26]  Julian Allen,et al.  University of Westminster Eprints , 2006 .

[27]  Jc Jan Fransoo,et al.  Freight distribution in megacities: Perspectives of shippers, logistics service providers and carriers , 2015 .

[28]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability , 2015 .

[29]  Mireia Roca-Riu,et al.  Stakeholder’s profitability of carrier-led consolidation strategies in urban goods distribution , 2017 .

[30]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  Transition through dialogue: A stakeholder based decision process for cities: The case of city distribution , 2015 .

[31]  Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.  A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[33]  Luisa Scaccia,et al.  Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective , 2015 .

[34]  Nils Boysen,et al.  Warehousing in the e-commerce era: A survey , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..