A multi-criteria application to select energy retrofit measures at the building and district scale

Abstract The rapid growth of urbanization stresses the necessity of new sustainable paradigms for transition strategies toward energy efficient cities. Particularly, the building sector plays a fundamental role in driving urban energy consumption and GHG emission reduction. Improving the energy efficiency of existing buildings has a great potential, however selecting among the multiple available retrofit solutions may result difficult for a decision maker. This work is an application of the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) method in order to provide a guideline for ranking different alternatives of building retrofitting at the building and district level. To this end, the case study of Turin has been selected for outranking five different retrofit alternatives. First, the retrofit alternatives were applied to a district and second, the same procedure was tested at the building level. The double scale approach provides guidelines to both municipalities and citizens. The proposed model supports building and district designers, energy planners and decision makers for ranking complex design energy retrofit options.

[1]  Corrado Schenone,et al.  Residential Building Retrofit through Numerical Simulation: A Case Study , 2017 .

[2]  Maria Catrinu Decision Aid for Planning Local Energy Systems: Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  Sven Werner,et al.  Heat Roadmap Europe: Identifying strategic heat synergy regions , 2014 .

[4]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update , 2006 .

[5]  Chiara Delmastro,et al.  Energy efficient urban districts: A multi-criteria application for selecting retrofit actions , 2017 .

[6]  Cristina Becchio,et al.  The cost-optimal methodology for the energy retrofit of an ex-industrial building located in Northern Italy , 2016 .

[7]  Danae Diakoulaki,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece , 2007 .

[8]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Planning With Multiple Criteria: Investigation, Communication, Choice , 1991 .

[9]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[10]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  Estimation of the building energy use intensity in the urban scale by integrating GIS and big data technology , 2016 .

[11]  E. Løken Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems , 2007 .

[12]  Andrea De Montis,et al.  Assessing the quality of different MCDA methods , 2004 .

[13]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Dealing with a multiple criteria environmental problem with interaction effects between criteria through an extension of the Electre III method , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Guglielmina Mutani,et al.  A supporting method for selecting cost-optimal energy retrofit policies for residential buildings at the urban scale , 2016 .

[15]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[16]  Francesca Abastante,et al.  Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems for Future Urban Energy Retrofitting Scenarios , 2017 .

[17]  Patrizia Lombardi,et al.  Urban energy planning procedure for sustainable development in the built environment: A review of available spatial approaches , 2017 .

[18]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art , 2012 .

[19]  Laura Gabrielli,et al.  Evaluation of energy retrofit in buildings under conditions of uncertainty: The prominence of the discount rate , 2017 .

[20]  Silvia Giordano,et al.  EVALUATING THE EUROPEAN SMART CITIES VISIONS OF THE FUTURE , 2012 .

[21]  Giorgia Peri,et al.  An ex post criticism, based on stakeholders’ preferences, of a residential sector’s energy master plan: the case study of the Sicilian region , 2017 .