Old Data—New Concepts: Integrating “Indirect Effects” Into Radiation Protection

Abstract Purpose: To address the following key question, what are the consequences of nontargeted and delayed effects for linear nonthreshold models of radiation risk? This paper considers low-dose “indirect” or nontargeted effects and how they might impact radiation protection, particularly at the level of the environment. Nontargeted effects refer to effects in cells, tissues, or organisms that were not targeted by irradiation and that did not receive direct energy deposition. They include genomic instability and lethal mutations in progeny of irradiated cells and bystander effects in neighboring cells, tissues, or organisms. Low-dose hypersensitivity and adaptive responses are sometimes included under the nontargeted effects umbrella, but these are not considered in this paper. Some concepts emerging in the nontargeted effects field that could be important include historic dose. This suggests that the initial exposure to radiation initiates the instability phenotype which is passed to progeny leading to a transgenerational radiation-response phenotype, which suggests that the system response rather than the individual response is critical in determining outcome. Conclusion: Nontargeted effects need to be considered, and modeling, experimental, and epidemiological approaches could all be used to determine the impact of nontargeted effects on the currently used linear nonthreshold model in radiation protection.

[1]  A. Møller,et al.  Long‐term effects of ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident: Possible contribution of historic dose , 2018, Environmental research.

[2]  L. Brazeau Environmental effects. , 2014, The Canadian nurse.

[3]  L. Feinendegen,et al.  Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis. , 1999, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[4]  F. Bréchignac,et al.  Radiation-induced risks at low dose: moving beyond controversy towards a new vision , 2013, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[5]  E. Yu,et al.  Radiation-induced second malignancies. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[6]  K. McHugh,et al.  Projected cancer risks potentially related to past, current, and future practices in paediatric CT in the United Kingdom, 1990–2020 , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Changing paradigms in radiobiology. , 2012, Mutation research.

[8]  W. Morgan,et al.  Non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation: implications for risk assessment and the radiation dose response profile. , 2009, Health physics.

[9]  Vittorio Cannatà,et al.  Radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging: wisdom and prudence, but still a lot to understand , 2017, La radiologia medica.

[10]  E. Wright,et al.  In vivo chromosomal instability and transmissible aberrations in the progeny of haemopoietic stem cells induced by high- and low-LET radiations , 2001, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  Jeffry A. Siegel,et al.  Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors) , 2016, Biological theory.

[12]  Yuchao Zhao,et al.  Modeling dose-Response at Low dose: A Systems Biology Approach for Ionization Radiation , 2010, Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society.

[13]  Giuseppe Schettino,et al.  Low-Dose Binary Behavior of Bystander Cell Killing after Microbeam Irradiation of a Single Cell with Focused CK X Rays , 2005, Radiation research.

[14]  I. Emerit Reactive oxygen species, chromosome mutation, and cancer: possible role of clastogenic factors in carcinogenesis. , 1994, Free radical biology & medicine.

[15]  M. Lynch,et al.  Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium , 2016, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[16]  Fiona M. Lyng,et al.  A Dose Threshold for a Medium Transfer Bystander Effect for a Human Skin Cell Line , 2006, Radiation research.

[17]  A. Hounsell,et al.  Out-of-field cell survival following exposure to intensity-modulated radiation fields. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D A Pierce,et al.  Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors , 2000, Radiation research.

[19]  L. Barnthouse,et al.  Using an Ecosystem Approach to complement protection schemes based on organism-level endpoints. , 2014, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[20]  A. Sigurdson,et al.  Iodine-131 Dose Dependent Gene Expression in Thyroid Cancers and Corresponding Normal Tissues Following the Chernobyl Accident , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Kenneth T Bogen,et al.  Linear‐No‐Threshold Default Assumptions are Unwarranted for Cytotoxic Endpoints Independently Triggered by Ultrasensitive Molecular Switches , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Th. Boveri Concerning the Origin of Malignant Tumours by Theodor Boveri. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[23]  Maciej Swat,et al.  Systems oncology: towards patient-specific treatment regimes informed by multiscale mathematical modelling. , 2015, Seminars in cancer biology.

[24]  Rory Conolly,et al.  Uncertainties in estimating health risks associated with exposure to ionising radiation , 2013, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[25]  J. Vives i Batlle,et al.  Population modelling to compare chronic external radiotoxicity between individual and population endpoints in four taxonomic groups. , 2016, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[26]  R. Stewart,et al.  Systemic mechanisms and effects of ionizing radiation: A new 'old' paradigm of how the bystanders and distant can become the players. , 2016, Seminars in cancer biology.

[27]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Chronic fatigue and immune deficiency syndrome (CFIDS), cellular metabolism, and ionizing radiation: a review of contemporary scientific literature and suggested directions for future research , 2018, International journal of radiation biology.

[28]  W. Morgan,et al.  Critical target and dose and dose-rate responses for the induction of chromosomal instability by ionizing radiation. , 1999, Radiation research.

[29]  Edward J Calabrese,et al.  The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate. , 2017, Environmental research.

[30]  S. Kry,et al.  Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators. , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[31]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Cell-cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium. , 1998, Radiation research.

[32]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Genetic Factors Influencing Bystander Signaling in Murine Bladder Epithelium after Low-Dose Irradiation In Vivo , 2005, Radiation research.

[33]  C. Mothersill,et al.  History of bystander effects research 1905-present; what is in a name? , 2018, International journal of radiation biology.

[34]  P. Iannaccone,et al.  On the clonal origin of tumors: A review of experimental models , 1987, International journal of cancer.

[35]  K. Butterworth,et al.  Impact of fractionation on out-of-field survival and DNA damage responses following exposure to intensity modulated radiation fields , 2016, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[36]  J. Redpath,et al.  Detrimental and Protective Bystander Effects: A Model Approach , 2007, Radiation research.

[37]  E. Calabrese The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT , 2017, Environmental research.

[38]  I. Bross,et al.  Do Atomic Veterans have excess cancer? New results correcting for the healthy soldier bias. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Low doses and non‐targeted effects in environmental radiation protection; where are we now and where should we go? , 2017, Environmental research.

[40]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Radiation-induced Bystander Effects: Are They Good, Bad or Both? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[41]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Longevity of atomic-bomb survivors , 2000, The Lancet.

[42]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Fundamental Mechanisms Underlying the Ill Health and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Suffered by Atomic and Gulf War Veterans: A Unifying Hypothesis , 2016 .

[43]  Edward J. Calabrese,et al.  Estimating Risk of Low Radiation Doses – A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis , 2014, Radiation research.

[44]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Primary explants of human uroepithelium show an unusual response to low-dose irradiation with cobalt-60 gamma rays. , 1995, Radiation research.

[45]  S. Demaria,et al.  Sensors of ionizing radiation effects on the immunological microenvironment of cancer , 2007, International journal of radiation biology.

[46]  Ganesh D Sockalingum,et al.  Vibrational spectroscopy in sensing radiobiological effects: analyses of targeted and non-targeted effects in human keratinocytes. , 2016, Faraday discussions.

[47]  C. Mothersill,et al.  The effect of microcolony size, at time of irradiation, on colony forming ability. , 1999, International journal of radiation biology.

[48]  Carmel Mothersill,et al.  Relative Contribution of Bystander and Targeted Cell Killing to the Low-Dose Region of the Radiation Dose–Response Curve , 2000, Radiation research.

[49]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Identification and characterization of three subtypes of radiation response in normal human urothelial cultures exposed to ionizing radiation. , 1999, Carcinogenesis.

[50]  E. Wright Radiation-induced genomic instability in haemopoietic cells. , 1998, International journal of radiation biology.

[51]  K Beaugelin-Seiller,et al.  Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context—an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project , 2010, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[52]  N. Kamada,et al.  Chromosome aberrations in normal leukocytes induced by the plasma of exposed individuals. , 1977, Hiroshima journal of medical sciences.

[53]  J. Beyea Lessons to be learned from a contentious challenge to mainstream radiobiological science (the linear no‐threshold theory of genetic mutations) , 2017, Environmental research.

[54]  Jan Christian Kaiser,et al.  Biologically-based mechanistic models of radiation-related carcinogenesis applied to epidemiological data , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[55]  O. Kovalchuk,et al.  Non-targeted radiation effects-an epigenetic connection. , 2011, Mutation research.

[56]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Radiation-induced genomic instability is associated with DNA methylation changes in cultured human keratinocytes. , 2006, Mutation research.

[57]  H J Muller,et al.  The Production of Mutations by X-Rays. , 1928, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  E. Hahn,et al.  Association of Smoking in the Home With Lung Cancer Worry, Perceived Risk, and Synergistic Risk , 2017, Oncology nursing forum.

[59]  J. Olsen,et al.  Chromosome analysis in childhood cancer survivors and their offspring--no evidence for radiotherapy-induced persistent genomic instability. , 2005, Mutation research.

[60]  T. Hei,et al.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo. , 2008, Acta medica Nagasakiensia.

[61]  J. Boice The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[62]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Parental gamma irradiation induces reprotoxic effects accompanied by genomic instability in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos , 2017, Environmental research.

[63]  O. Kovalchuk,et al.  Epigenetics in radiation biology: a new research frontier , 2013, Front. Genet..

[64]  A. Møller,et al.  Strong effects of ionizing radiation from Chernobyl on mutation rates , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[65]  E. Nakashima,et al.  Persistent subclinical inflammation among A-bomb survivors , 2001, International journal of radiation biology.

[66]  Dale L Preston,et al.  Solid Cancer Incidence among the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958–2009 , 2017, Radiation Research.

[67]  Gibin G. Powathil,et al.  When a duck is not a duck; a new interdisciplinary synthesis for environmental radiation protection , 2018, Environmental research.

[68]  C. Mothersill,et al.  The influence of smoking on radiation-induced bystander signal production in esophageal cancer patients. , 2016, Environmental research.

[69]  R K Sachs,et al.  Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[70]  K. Seong,et al.  Is the Linear No-Threshold Dose-Response Paradigm Still Necessary for the Assessment of Health Effects of Low Dose Radiation? , 2016, Journal of Korean medical science.

[71]  N. Hamada,et al.  Classification of radiation effects for dose limitation purposes: history, current situation and future prospects , 2014, Journal of radiation research.

[72]  H. Vandenhove,et al.  A review of multiple stressor studies that include ionising radiation. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[73]  K. Goh,et al.  Breaks in normal human chromosomes: are they induced by a transferable substance in the plasma of persons exposed to total-body irradiation? , 1968, Radiation research.

[74]  D. Preston,et al.  Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part IV: Comparison of cancer incidence and mortality. , 1994, Radiation research.

[75]  Edward J. Calabrese,et al.  Flaws in the LNT single‐hit model for cancer risk: An historical assessment , 2017, Environmental research.

[76]  R. Lafrenie,et al.  Non-targeted effects and radiation-induced carcinogenesis: a review , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[77]  T. Hei,et al.  Radiation induced non-targeted response: mechanism and potential clinical implications. , 2011, Current molecular pharmacology.

[78]  A. Møller,et al.  Are Organisms Adapting to Ionizing Radiation at Chernobyl? , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[79]  G. Shaw Applying radioecology in a world of multiple contaminants. , 2005, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[80]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Survival of human epithelial cells irradiated with cobalt 60 as microcolonies or single cells. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[81]  Dong Wook Kim,et al.  Secondary cancer‐incidence risk estimates for external radiotherapy and high‐dose‐rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer: phantom study , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[82]  K. Rothkamm,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[83]  Non-Targeted Effects Models Predict Significantly Higher Mars Mission Cancer Risk than Targeted Effects Models , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[84]  E. Hall,et al.  Radiobiology for the radiologist , 1973 .

[85]  E. Wright,et al.  Chromosomal instability in unirradiated cells induced in vivo by a bystander effect of ionizing radiation. , 2000, Cancer research.

[86]  Xiaodong Jin,et al.  The influence of non-DNA-targeted effects on carbon ion–induced low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity in MRC-5 cells , 2015, Journal of radiation research.

[87]  D. Brenner What we know and what we don't know about cancer risks associated with radiation doses from radiological imaging , 2014, The British journal of radiology.

[88]  G. Stassi,et al.  Cancer stem cells – old concepts, new insights , 2008, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[89]  D. Preston,et al.  Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958-1987. , 1994, Radiation research.

[90]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation risks from pediatric computed tomography scanning. , 2009, Pediatric endocrinology reviews : PER.

[91]  Magda Havas,et al.  Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity with Emphasis on Diabetes and Multiple Sclerosis , 2006, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[92]  S. Kry,et al.  Out‐of‐field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[93]  N. Magné,et al.  Risk of second cancers in the era of modern radiation therapy: does the risk/benefit analysis overcome theoretical models? , 2016, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[94]  F. Lyng,et al.  Cell Survival and DNA Damage in Normal Prostate Cells Irradiated Out-of-Field , 2014, Radiation research.

[95]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Dose- and time-response relationships for lethal mutations and chromosomal instability induced by ionizing radiation in an immortalized human keratinocyte cell line. , 2000, International journal of radiation biology.

[96]  Neal A Palafox,et al.  Health consequences and health systems response to the Pacific U.S. Nuclear Weapons Testing Program. , 2007, Pacific health dialog.

[97]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Individual variation in the production of a 'bystander signal' following irradiation of primary cultures of normal human urothelium. , 2001, Carcinogenesis.

[98]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Radiation-induced bystander effects and adaptive responses--the Yin and Yang of low dose radiobiology? , 2004, Mutation research.

[99]  Y. Tesfaigzi,et al.  Mechanistic Basis for Nonlinear Dose-Response Relationships for Low-Dose Radiation-Induced Stochastic Effects , 2003, Nonlinearity in biology, toxicology, medicine.

[100]  D. Brenner,et al.  Do low dose-rate bystander effects influence domestic radon risks? , 2002, International journal of radiation biology.

[101]  W. Morgan,et al.  Genomic instability induced by high and low LET ionizing radiation. , 2000, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[102]  M. Tomita,et al.  Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses , 2014, Journal of radiation research.

[103]  H. Mozdarani Biological Complexities in Radiation Carcinogenesis and Cancer Radiotherapy: Impact of New Biological Paradigms , 2012, Genes.

[104]  M. Little,et al.  Non-targeted effects of ionising radiation--implications for low dose risk. , 2013, Mutation research.

[105]  F. Pajonk,et al.  Characterization of the stem cell niche and its importance in radiobiological response. , 2013, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[106]  Y. Dubrova,et al.  Elevated minisatellite mutation rate in the post-chernobyl families from ukraine. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[107]  M. Pall Post-radiation syndrome as a NO/ONOO- cycle, chronic fatigue syndrome-like disease. , 2008, Medical hypotheses.

[108]  E. Hahn,et al.  Radon, Secondhand Smoke, and Children in the Home: Creating a Teachable Moment for Lung Cancer Prevention. , 2016, Public health nursing.

[109]  Mortimer M. Elkind,et al.  The radiobiology of cultured mammalian cells , 1967 .

[110]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Bystander effects induced by serum from survivors of the Chernobyl accident. , 2007, Experimental hematology.

[111]  P. Nowell The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. , 1976, Science.

[112]  G Schettino,et al.  Low-Dose Studies of Bystander Cell Killing with Targeted Soft X Rays , 2003, Radiation research.