Linear affine transformations between 3-lead (Frank XYZ leads) vectorcardiogram and 12-lead electrocardiogram signals.

BACKGROUND Recent advances in computer graphics and wireless technologies have renewed interest in vectorcardiogram (VCG) signals that use fewer leads than the conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals for medical diagnostic applications. However, most cardiologists are accustomed to the 12-lead ECG even though some of the leads are either nearly aligned with or derived from the others and consequently contain redundant information. The ability to transform from orthogonal 3-lead VCG to 12-lead ECG enables the use of fewer leads for signal analysis, computer visualization, and wireless transmission of signals. This can also improve mobility, albeit limited, to the patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We present a statistical approach to transform 3-lead Frank VCG to 12-lead ECG signals and vice versa, based on Dower's pioneering work on lead transformation. This approach enables compensation of baseline shifts and other constant biases present in long ECG data streams, so that the resulting statistical transforms can be more consistent and accurate. We compare the performance of the affine transform with that of Dower transform (from 3 to 12 and from 12 to 3) using the data from the PhysioNet PTB database. RESULTS The results show that for both myocardial infarction (MI) and healthy control (HC) subjects, the statistical affine transform presented here maps 3-lead VCG to12-lead ECG more accurately than Dower or other lead transformation matrices of the ECG recordings. DISCUSSION This investigation also shows the limitations associated with single dipole assumption that underlies Dower's geometric transformation. The results also indicate that lead transformation accuracy can be improved using separate customized transforms to, for example, age or pathologic conditions (here, MI vs HC) than a single statistical or geometric transform. Pertinently, we find that the affine transform coefficients can serve as discriminating features for classification/discrimination of MI patients from HC subjects.

[1]  Lars Edenbrandt,et al.  12 LEAD VECTORCARDIOGRAPHY , 1995 .

[2]  E SIMONSON,et al.  Respiratory changes of the spatial vectorcardiogram recorded with different lead systems. , 1957, American heart journal.

[3]  G E Dower,et al.  A lead synthesizer for the Frank system to simulate the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. , 1968, Journal of electrocardiology.

[4]  H V PIPBERGER,et al.  Correlation of clinical information in the standard 12-lead ECG and in a corrected orthogonal 3-lead ECG. , 1961, American heart journal.

[5]  E. Frank,et al.  A Direct Experimental Study of Three Systems of Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1954, Circulation.

[6]  Lawrence J. Fogel,et al.  Progress in Biomedical Engineering , 1967 .

[7]  Smith Re,et al.  The effect of electrode position on a modified Frank electrovectorcardiographic lead system. , 1971 .

[8]  Ch. L. Levkov,et al.  Orthogonal electrocardiogram derived from the limb and chest electrodes of the conventional 12-lead system , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  Dirk Q Feild,et al.  Statistical and deterministic approaches to designing transformations of electrocardiographic leads. , 2002, Journal of electrocardiology.

[10]  G E Dower,et al.  Deriving the 12-lead electrocardiogram from four (EASI) electrodes. , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[11]  U. Sigwart,et al.  Methods used to interpret the 12-lead electrocardiogram: pattern memorization versus the use of vector concepts. , 2000 .

[12]  Steven Swiryn,et al.  Derivation of orthogonal leads from the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Performance of an atrial-based transform for the derivation of P loops. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[13]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Evaluation of synthesized standard 12 leads and Frank vector leads. , 1976, Advances in cardiology.

[14]  P. Rautaharju,et al.  Body Position, Electrode Level, and Respiration Effects on the Frank Lead Electrocardiogram , 1976, Circulation.

[15]  R E Smith,et al.  The effect of electrode position on a modified Frank electrovectorcardiographic lead system. , 1971, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[16]  J A ABILDSKOV,et al.  The Relation of Precordial and Orthogonal Leads , 1963, Circulation.

[17]  C L Feldman,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of derived versus standard 12-lead electrocardiograms. , 2000, Journal of electrocardiology.

[18]  G. Dower.  The ECGD: a derivation of the ECG from VCG leads. , 1984, Journal of electrocardiology.

[19]  Hui Yang,et al.  Classification of atrial fibrillation episodes from sparse electrocardiogram data. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[20]  S. Swiryn,et al.  Derivation of orthogonal leads from the 12-lead ECG. accuracy of a single transform for the derivation of atrial and ventricular waves , 2006, 2006 Computers in Cardiology.

[21]  Ernestfrank.  An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956 .

[22]  B.G. Celler,et al.  A critical review of the synthesis of the orthogonal Frank lead ECGs from 12 lead recordings , 1994, Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[24]  O. Pahlm,et al.  Vectorcardiogram synthesized from a 12-lead ECG: superiority of the inverse Dower matrix. , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[25]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  Comparability of 12-lead ECGs derived from EASI leads with standard 12-lead ECGS in the classification of acute myocardial ischemia and old myocardial infarction. , 2002, Journal of electrocardiology.