Decision rules for metrological confirmation of EMC measurement equipment

In the forthcoming edition of the standard ISO/IEC 17025 emphasis is placed on the “decision rules” according to which conformity to a specified requirement is stated taking measurement uncertainty into account. Decision rules shall be defined in particular for metrological confirmation, i.e. to confirm that a measuring instrument is adequate to its intended use. The level of risk associated with false acceptance and false rejection and inherent with the adopted decision rule shall be calculated. In this work three decision rules are proposed that apply to the case where: a) calibration uncertainty is comparable with the tolerance set by standards, as frequently occurs in the case of electromagnetic compatibility measuring equipment; b) the specification to be met is expressed in terms of a coverage interval corresponding to a given coverage probability; c) no specification or requirement is available and confirmation has to be obtained by comparison with previous calibration data. The three decision rules proposed here are not, and cannot be, exhaustive. Further investigation is underway.

[1]  C. F. M. Carobbi,et al.  The Effect of the Imperfect Realization of the Artificial Mains Network Impedance on the Reproducibility of Conducted Emission Measurements , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[2]  F. Pennecchi,et al.  Bayesian conformity assessment in presence of systematic measurement errors , 2016 .

[3]  Carlo F. M. Carobbi,et al.  Bayesian Inference in Action in EMC—Fundamentals and Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  The Statistical Field Uniformity Criterion in Transverse Electromagnetic Waveguides , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[5]  Note on the Expected Value and Standard Deviation of the Mismatch Correction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[6]  Carlo Carobbi A modified ISO 13528 robust analysis (Algorithm A) that takes measurement uncertainty into account , 2017 .

[7]  Michele Borsero,et al.  Time-Domain Characterization of the Surge, EFT/Burst, and ESD Measurement Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Michele Borsero,et al.  Design, Preparation, Conduct, and Result of a Proficiency Test of Radiated Emission Measurements , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  Carlo F. M. Carobbi Measurement Error of the Standard Unidirectional Impulse Waveforms Due to the Limited Bandwidth of the Measuring System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[10]  Carlo F. M. Carobbi,et al.  Elementary and ideal equivalent circuit model of the 1, 2/50-8/20 μs combination wave generator , 2013, IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine.

[11]  Michele Borsero,et al.  Proficiency Testing by Using Traveling Samples With Preassigned Reference Values , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.