Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects.

The crowding effect is a ubiquitous phenomenon in spatial perception that has been extensively investigated. A notable property of spatial crowding is the radial and tangential asymmetry in which crowding is much more severe for items arranged on a radial line originating from the fixation point compared with items arranged tangentially with regard to the fixation point. Here, we report another asymmetric property of the crowding effect between horizontally and vertically arranged spatial layouts. In multiple experiments using a number of different stimulus patterns (e.g., letter Cs, letter Ts, and parallel/nonparallel line segments), results consistently showed that the crowding effect was significantly stronger when the target and distractors were horizontally rather than vertically arranged. Such a horizontal versus vertical asymmetry was found in all four quadrants of visual space. Importantly, a further visual acuity test did not reveal a horizontal versus vertical asymmetric effect.

[1]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Texture segregation based on two-dimensional relative phase differences in composite sine-wave grating patterns , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  D M Levi,et al.  Peripheral hyperacuity: isoeccentric bisection is better than radial bisection. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  H. Wilson,et al.  Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  H. Bouma,et al.  Eccentric vision: Adverse interactions between line segments , 1976, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  H. Strasburger.  Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[13]  G. Fishman,et al.  Contrast thresholds for letter identification in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Vision Research.

[15]  Gerald Westheimer.  Anisotropies in peripheral vernier acuity. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[16]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[17]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[18]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[20]  S J Leat,et al.  Crowding in central and eccentric vision: the effects of contour interaction and attention. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Jacobs.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery , 1979, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Wolford,et al.  Lateral masking vertically and horizontally , 1983 .

[24]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Target Salience in Crowding , 2005, Perception.

[26]  H. Burian,et al.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Elizabeth L Bjork,et al.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing. , 1977, Psychological review.

[28]  S. Dakin,et al.  The shape and size of crowding for moving targets , 2003, Vision Research.