Finite element analysis of side branch access during bifurcation stenting.

Stent implantation has become a widely accepted endovascular intervention for the treatment of stenosed arteries. This minimally invasive technique has shown excellent results in unbranched arteries. However, stenting bifurcation lesions remains a challenge in coronary intervention as it is associated with a lower success rate. Many different techniques have been proposed in medical practice but all the suggested methodologies have specific limitations. Numerical simulations may help to understand and eliminate the shortcomings of current clinical techniques and devices. In this study, one of the currently applied techniques is analysed which involves the implantation of a stent in the main branch, followed by subsequent inflation of a balloon through the side of the stent. This improves the side branch patency and provides access to the side branch for later stent implantations. The impact of using different balloon sizes and stent designs was investigated. The stent cell through which the balloon is inflated increases considerably and as intuitively expected, using a larger balloon results in a larger opening. Furthermore, it was observed that this procedure may compromise the downstream main branch lumen. These observations correspond well with previously reported results, which were based on in vitro studies. The added value of the proposed numerical model is the ability to study many different techniques/stents, without the need for various expensive stent samples.

[1]  P. E. McHugh,et al.  The Stress–Strain Behavior of Coronary Stent Struts is Size Dependent , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  A Numerical Model to Study the Interaction of Vascular Stents with Human Atherosclerotic Lesions , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Lorenza Petrini,et al.  A predictive study of the mechanical behaviour of coronary stents by computer modelling. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  M. Morice,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease , 2004, Heart.

[5]  J. Tobis,et al.  Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent--immediate and follow-up results. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Ogden,et al.  Mechanics of biological tissue , 2006 .

[7]  D. Stoeckel,et al.  A survey of stent designs , 2002, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[8]  M. Niemelä,et al.  Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation Study , 2006, Circulation.

[9]  Min Qi,et al.  Delivery and release of nitinol stent in carotid artery and their interactions: a finite element analysis. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  P. E. McHugh,et al.  Modeling of Size Dependent Failure in Cardiovascular Stent Struts under Tension and Bending , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Matthieu De Beule Finite element stent design , 2008 .

[12]  R. Oppermann Strength of materials, part I, elementary theory and problems , 1941 .

[13]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Pascal Verdonck,et al.  Realistic finite element-based stent design: the impact of balloon folding. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  B Verhegghe,et al.  Numerical study of the uniformity of balloon-expandable stent deployment. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Coronary-artery stents. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. , 2005 .

[18]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Vladimir Dzavik,et al.  Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle. , 2006, American heart journal.

[20]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Analysis of prolapse in cardiovascular stents: a constitutive equation for vascular tissue and finite-element modelling. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  I. Iakovou,et al.  Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  H. White,et al.  Stent deformation following simulated side‐branch dilatation: A comparison of five stent designs , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[23]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Randomized Study to Evaluate Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Implanted at Coronary Bifurcation Lesions , 2004, Circulation.