Performance of Glyphosate-tolerant Cotton Cultivars in Official Cultivar Trials

All cultivars in official cultivar trials (OCT) typically receive a conventional herbicide program, and questions have arisen concerning the validity of glyphosate-tolerant (GT) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) performance data under these conditions. Additionally, stagnant yields and declining fiber quality, concurrent with widespread planting of GT cultivars, have raised questions concerning the agronomic performance of these cultivars. The objectives of this study were to evaluate yield and fiber quality of GT cultivars treated with conventional or glyphosate-only herbicide systems and to compare performance of GT cultivars to a non-transgenic cultivar. Depending on the year, 8 to 19 GT cultivars were treated with either a conventional herbicide system or a glyphosate-only system in field studies in North Carolina during 1997 to 1999. Additionally, the GT cultivars were compared under a conventional herbicide system to Stoneville 474 (St 474), a non-transgenic cultivar with a history of good performance in North Carolina. The GT cultivar by herbicide system interaction was not significant for lint yield, fiber length, strength, micronaire, or uniformity index. Additionally, lint yield and fiber quality was not different between herbicide systems. These results imply that OCT with conventional and GT cultivars treated with a conventional herbicide program adequately indicate rank-order assessments among cultivars. Yield and fiber quality of GT cultivars, as a group, were not inferior in yield and fiber quality to ST 474 when a conventional herbicide system was used.

[1]  S. Askew,et al.  Cost and Weed Management with Herbicide Programs in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 1999, Weed Technology.

[2]  P. Dugger,et al.  Fiber quality comparisons among varieties for conventional, Bollgard® and Roundup Ready® versions. , 2000 .

[3]  L. May,et al.  Proposed guidelines for pre-commercial evaluation of transgenic and conventional cotton cultivars. , 2000 .

[4]  A. C. York Peanut Response to Fluometuron Applied to a Preceeding Cotton Crop1 , 1993 .

[5]  K. E. Savage,et al.  Fluometuron-Disulfoton Interactions in Cotton as Affected by Soil Properties , 1973, Weed Science.

[6]  W. Fehr Principles of Cultivar Development: Crop Species , 1987 .

[7]  D. Bowman North Carolina measured crop performance soybean and cotton 1995 , 1995 .

[8]  O. L. May,et al.  Yield Ranks of Glyphosate‐Resistant Cotton Cultivars are Unaffected by Herbicide Systems , 2002 .

[9]  Laval M. Verhalen,et al.  BREEDING & GENETICS Lint Yield, Lint Percentage, and Fiber Quality Response in Bollgard, Roundup Ready, and Bollgard/Roundup Ready Cotton , 2003 .

[10]  A. Price,et al.  Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton as influenced by application method and growth stage , 2001, Weed Science.

[11]  R. Frans,et al.  Protecting Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) from Fluometuron Injury with Seed Protectants , 1991, Weed Science.

[12]  J. Keeling,et al.  Preemergence Weed Control in a Conservation Tillage Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Cropping System on Sandy Soils , 1989, Weed Technology.

[13]  M. L. Taylor,et al.  Glyphosate-Tolerant Cotton: Genetic Characterization and Protein Expression , 1996 .

[14]  M. S. McIntosh,et al.  Analysis of Combined Experiments1 , 1983 .

[15]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[16]  R. Talbert,et al.  Effect of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Herbicide Carryover on Subsequent Crops , 1986, Weed Science.

[17]  P. Dugger,et al.  Economic comparison of weed control systems in conservation tillage systems AL, AR, CA, GA, LA, MS, SC, & TX. , 2000 .

[18]  Eric Hequet,et al.  Fiber properties and textile performance of transgenic cotton versus parent varieties. , 2000 .

[19]  James H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach (2nd ed) , 1980 .

[20]  J. R. Smart,et al.  Weed management in conservation tillage cotton. , 1996 .

[21]  A. Culpepper,et al.  Fluometuron Carryover to Flue-Cured Tobacco Following Application to Cotton , 2001 .

[22]  A. Culpepper,et al.  Weed Management and Net Returns With Transgenic, Herbicide-Resistant, and Nontransgenic Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 1999, Weed Technology.

[23]  Michael A. Jones,et al.  Tolerance of Transgenic Cotton to Topical Applications of Glyphosate , 1999 .

[24]  A. Culpepper,et al.  Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. , 1998 .

[25]  Anton E. Coy,et al.  2005 peanut, cotton, and tobacco performance tests , 2006 .