Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition.

This study examined the performance of 38 normal subjects and 43 patients with focal lesions of the frontal lobes on a simple go-nogo task where the probability of the nogo stimulus was either 75% or 25%. Patients with lesions to the superior medial parts of the frontal lobes, in particular to the left superior portion of Brodmann area 6 (which includes the supplementary motor areas and the premotor areas for the right hand) had an increased number of false alarms (incorrect responses to the nogo stimulus). These results indicate that area 6 is specifically involved in the inhibition of response. Patients with lesions to the right anterior cingulate (areas 24 and 32) were slower and more variable in their reaction time. These findings could be explained by an inability to sustain stimulus-response contingencies. Lesions to the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 44, 45, 47) also increased the variability of response, perhaps by disrupting monitoring performance.

[1]  E. Mempel,et al.  Disinhibition of Inhibitory Conditioned Responses following Selective Brain Lesions in Dogs , 1961, Science.

[2]  S. Brutkowski Functions of prefrontal cortex in animals. , 1965, Physiological reviews.

[3]  P. Rabbitt Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  E. Drewe An experimental investigation of Luria's theory on the effects of frontal lobe lesions in man , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  E. Drewe Go - No Go Learning After Frontal Lobe Lesions in Humans , 1975, Cortex.

[6]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Scalp Topography of the P3 Wave in Different Auditory Decision Tasks , 1976 .

[7]  W. A. Cobb,et al.  The Responsive Brain , 1977 .

[8]  A. Luria Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[9]  J. Charney,et al.  Aphasia and Associated Disorders: Taxonomy, Localization, and Recovery , 1981 .

[10]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Reversible go–no go deficits in a case of frontal lobe tumor , 1985, Annals of neurology.

[12]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  K. Heilman,et al.  Response preparation and response inhibition after lesions of the medial frontal lobe. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[16]  M. Petrides Comparative architectonic analysis of the human and the macaque frontal cortex , 1994 .

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[18]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Mapping P300 waves onto inhibition: Go/No-Go discrimination. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  F. Richer,et al.  Response selection deficits in frontal excisions , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Non-spatial attention disorders in patients with frontal or posterior brain damage. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Binary choice in patients with prefrontal or posterior brain damage. A relative judgement theory analysis , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection — a PET study in man , 1996, Brain Research.

[25]  P. Goldman-Rakic The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding human mentation and the central executive. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A Developmental Functional MRI Study of Prefrontal Activation during Performance of a Go-No-Go Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  S Clare,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of single motor events reveals human presupplementary motor area , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[29]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  M Spitzer,et al.  The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event‐related potentials in a go/no go task , 1998, Neuroreport.

[31]  B. Feige,et al.  The Role of Higher-Order Motor Areas in Voluntary Movement as Revealed by High-Resolution EEG and fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[32]  I. Robertson,et al.  The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Jeffrey P. Toth,et al.  Dissociation of attentional processes in patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Parkin,et al.  Reversed negative priming following frontal lobe lesions , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[41]  K Kurata,et al.  Activation of the dorsal premotor cortex and pre-supplementary motor area of humans during an auditory conditional motor task. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  P. Strick,et al.  Imaging the premotor areas , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[44]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[45]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[46]  D. Stuss,et al.  Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  T. Paus Primate anterior cingulate cortex: Where motor control, drive and cognition interface , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex , 2001, Neurology.

[50]  Brian Levine,et al.  Fractionalization and localization of distinct frontal lobe processes: Evidence from focal lesions in humans , 2002 .

[51]  Malcolm A Binns,et al.  Dissociations within the anterior attentional system: effects of task complexity and irrelevant information on reaction time speed and accuracy. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[52]  D. Stuss,et al.  Principles of frontal lobe function , 2002 .

[53]  Kazunori Sato,et al.  The Human Prefrontal and Parietal Association Cortices Are Involved in NO-GO Performances: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[54]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  FMRI evidence for an organization of prefrontal cortex by both type of process and type of information. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  D. Stuss,et al.  Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory attentional control in patients with frontal lobe damage , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[58]  M. Rieger,et al.  Inhibition of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal, and basal ganglia lesions. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[59]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Functional imaging and neuropsychology findings: how can they be linked? , 2003, NeuroImage.

[60]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[61]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[62]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[63]  T. Robbins,et al.  A componential analysis of task-switching deficits associated with lesions of left and right frontal cortex. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[64]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Individual differences in error processing: a review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the GO/NOGO task. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Prefrontal‐subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event‐related fMRI , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[67]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[68]  H. Karnath,et al.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[69]  Franck Vidal,et al.  Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[70]  John J. Foxe,et al.  A topography of executive functions and their interactions revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[71]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity , 1970, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Shaping the excitability of human motor cortex with premotor rTMS , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[74]  S. Roper,et al.  Attentional Inhibition in Patients with Focal Frontal Lobe Lesions , 2005, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[75]  Cameron S Carter,et al.  Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[76]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Response Inhibition: Relevance for Genetic Research in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[77]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[78]  K. Berman,et al.  Meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card‐Sorting task and component processes , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[79]  T Shallice,et al.  Impaired concentration due to frontal lobe damage from two distinct lesion sites , 2005, Neurology.

[80]  Joy Hirsch,et al.  Functional Specialization within the Medial Frontal Gyrus for Perceptual Go/No-Go Decisions Based on What, When, and Where Related Information: An fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[81]  M. Farah,et al.  Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[82]  T. Shallice,et al.  Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[83]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control , 2006, Brain Research.

[84]  Laura Busse,et al.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[85]  R. Constable,et al.  Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[86]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Keeping time: Effects of focal frontal lesions , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[87]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.