Methodologies for the analysis and classification of PET neuroimages

Neuroimaging analysis aims to support clinicians in the diagnosis of neurological diseases by using radiological images. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear medicine imaging technique used to produce three-dimensional images of the human brain for neurological studies. Due to the large number of generated images, there is a lot of effort in defining computer based tools to analyze and classify brain images. Such analyses are used to identify cerebral regions of interest (ROI) related to specific neurodegenerative diseases. Statistical tools, such as SPM (for Statistical Parametric Mapping) and its MarsBar plugin, are largely used by physicians for ROIs identification and for image analysis. Nevertheless, large datasets analysis (e.g. studying pathologies for many patients and for large sets of PET images) requires repetitive SPM procedures for each patient’s image, mainly due to the lack of (i) automatic procedures for analysing set of patients, and (ii) validation of using SPM versus patient magnetic resonance as reference brain templates. Finally, SPM analysis requires human intervention, and there is no automatic system guiding physicians for pathologies identification. As a contribution for the latter issue, we defined an automatic classification tool using topological relations among ROIs to support physicians while studying a new patient. Starting from a set of known pathologies associated to medical annotated PET images (i.e. associated to neurological pathologies), we used SPM and MarsBaR tools to define a reference PET images dataset; ROIs extracted from input PET images have been compared with known dataset and classified, suggesting physicians with (a subset of) pathologies associated to those PET images. Experiments showed that the classifier performs well. Moreover, in order to improve the repeatability of experiments with large datasets, we use an SPM plugin called AutoSPET, which allows to perform SPM analysis on a large PET images dataset, using different SPM plugins within a unified user interface, and allowing to simply run statistical analyses. AutoSPET is available on our server and also as an SPM plugin on the SPM website. Finally we report experiments to validate the use of the standard T1 SPM template versus the magnetic resonance ones.

[1]  Mijin Yun,et al.  Relationship between bilateral temporal hypometabolism and EEG findings for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Analysis of 18F-FDG PET using SPM , 2006, Seizure.

[2]  Stefano Marrone,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping of FDG-PET in Alzheimer disease , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications.

[3]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Effect of the normalization template in statistical parametric mapping of PET scans , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[5]  Nan-Tsing Chiu,et al.  REGISTRATION AND NORMALIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR ASSESSING BRAIN FUNCTIONAL IMAGES , 2003 .

[6]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Positron emission tomography in clinical neurology. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[7]  Toshiki Yoshimine,et al.  Crossed cerebellar diaschisis: a positron emission tomography study withl-[methyl-11C]methionine and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[8]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Anne-Marie Christin,et al.  Text and image , 1995, European Review.

[10]  Sanjiv S. Gambhir,et al.  AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis , 2003 .

[11]  梶本 勝文,et al.  Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis : a Positron Emission Tomography Study with L-[methyl-11C] methionine and 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose , 2007 .

[12]  B. Soong,et al.  Regional patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 3 and 6 , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[13]  Dong Soo Lee,et al.  Quantification of F-18 FDG PET Images in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients Using Probabilistic Brain Atlas , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  T. Shallice,et al.  The Organisation of Mind , 2011, Cortex.

[15]  Jayant Sharma,et al.  Modeling Topological Spatial Relations: Strategies for Query Processing , 1998 .

[16]  Kenya Murase,et al.  Comparison of Regional Brain Volume and Glucose Metabolism Between Patients with Mild Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Those with Mild Alzheimer's Disease , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Vincent Frouin,et al.  Striatal neural grafting improves cortical metabolism in Huntington's disease patients. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Changes in brain functional homogeneity in subjects with Alzheimer's disease , 2002, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[19]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping and cluster counting analysis of [18F] FDG-PET imaging in traumatic brain injury. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[20]  Nicola Pavese,et al.  Progressive striatal and cortical dopamine receptor dysfunction in Huntington's disease: a PET study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  D L Na,et al.  Glucose metabolism in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: a statistical parametric mapping analysis of 18F‐FDG PET , 2012, European journal of neurology.

[22]  Mark A. Haidekker,et al.  Advanced Biomedical Image Analysis: Haidekker/Biomedical Image , 2010 .

[23]  S Laureys,et al.  Multimodal neuroimaging in patients with disorders of consciousness showing "functional hemispherectomy". , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[24]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of the performance of SPM analysis in PET neuroactivation studies : A Monte Carlo investigation , 2003 .

[25]  A. Convit,et al.  Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD , 2005, Neurology.

[26]  Pierangelo Veltri,et al.  Statistical analysis of PET images , 2012, SIGH.

[27]  Mark Slifstein,et al.  Effect of Spatial Smoothing on t-Maps: Arguments for Going Back from t-Maps to Masked Contrast Images , 2006, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  E. Reiman,et al.  Multicenter Standardized 18F-FDG PET Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Other Dementias , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain , 2005, European Review.

[30]  Mark A. Haidekker,et al.  Advanced Biomedical Image Analysis , 2010 .

[31]  Pierangelo Veltri,et al.  A ROI-based algorithm for the classification of PET neuroimages , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW).

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MRI and PET Coregistration—A Cross Validation of Statistical Parametric Mapping and Automated Image Registration , 1997, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[34]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[35]  Naokazu Miyamoto,et al.  Comparison of grey matter and metabolic reductions in frontotemporal dementia using FDG-PET and voxel-based morphometric MR studies , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  J. S. Lee,et al.  18F-FDG PET findings in frontotemporal dementia: an SPM analysis of 29 patients. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  G. Tononi,et al.  The neurology of consciousness : cognitive neuroscience and neuropathology , 2009 .

[38]  C. DeCarli,et al.  FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .