Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing.

There is demand for methodologies to establish levels of safety concern associated with dietary exposures to chemicals for which no toxicological data are available. In such situations, the application of in silico methods appears promising. To make safety statement requires quantitative predictions of toxicological reference points such as no observed adverse effect level and carcinogenic potency for DNA-reacting chemicals. A decision tree (DT) has been developed to aid integrating exposure information and predicted toxicological reference points obtained with quantitative structure activity relationship ((Q)SAR) software and read across techniques. The predicted toxicological values are compared with exposure to obtain margins of exposure (MoE). The size of the MoE defines the level of safety concern and should account for a number of uncertainties such as the classical interspecies and inter-individual variability as well as others determined on a case by case basis. An analysis of the uncertainties of in silico approaches together with results from case studies suggest that establishing safety concern based on application of the DT is unlikely to be significantly more uncertain than based on experimental data. The DT makes a full use of all data available, ensuring an adequate degree of conservatism. It can be used when fast decision making is required.

[1]  Lutz Müller,et al.  A rationale for determining, testing, and controlling specific impurities in pharmaceuticals that possess potential for genotoxicity. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  M. Cronin In Silico Toxicology Challenges for Pharmaceuticals: Complacency or Controversy? , 2009, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[3]  David K. Robbins,et al.  Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Impurities in Marketed Compounds Administered over a Short-Term Duration: Applications to Oncology Products and Implications for Impurity Control Limits , 2010 .

[4]  M. Pieters,et al.  Evaluation of the uncertainty factor for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation: statistical analysis of toxicity data. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  Applicability of QSAR analysis in the evaluation of developmental and neurotoxicity effects for the assessment of the toxicological relevance of metabolites and degradates of pesticide active substances for dietary risk assessment , 2011 .

[6]  Raghuraman Venkatapathy,et al.  Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[7]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Chemical reactivity indices and mechanism‐based read‐across for non‐animal based assessment of skin sensitisation potential , 2008, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[8]  I. Hertz-Picciotto,et al.  Risk characterisation of chemicals in food and diet. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  R. Watkins,et al.  In silico assessment of toxicity of heat-generated food contaminants. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  Errol Zeiger,et al.  Measuring Intra-Assay Agreement for the Ames Salmonella Assay , 1991 .

[11]  Edwin J Matthews,et al.  In silico approaches to explore toxicity end points: issues and concerns for estimating human health effects , 2007, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[12]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[13]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[14]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Assessment factors for extrapolation from short-time to chronic exposure--are the REACH guidelines adequate? , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[15]  T. W. Schultz Chapter 14:Adverse Outcome Pathways: A Way of Linking Chemical Structure to In Vivo Toxicological Hazards , 2010 .

[16]  Philip Carthew,et al.  A proposed framework for assessing risk from less-than-lifetime exposures to carcinogens , 2011, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[17]  Ocspp,et al.  Standing Operating Procedures for Developing Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for Hazardous Chemicals , 2014 .

[18]  Micha Rautenberg,et al.  lazar: a modular predictive toxicology framework , 2013, Front. Pharmacol..

[19]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[20]  M. Cronin The Prediction of Skin Permeability Using Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Methods , 2005 .

[21]  I Mangelsdorf,et al.  Evaluation of time extrapolation factors based on the database RepDose. , 2011, Toxicology letters.

[22]  Paolo Mazzatorta,et al.  Integration of Structure-Activity Relationship and Artificial Intelligence Systems To Improve in Silico Prediction of Ames Test Mutagenicity , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  R Benigni,et al.  Understanding Genetic Toxicity Through Data Mining: The Process of Building Knowledge by Integrating Multiple Genetic Toxicity Databases , 2008, Toxicology mechanisms and methods.

[25]  S. Enoch,et al.  Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  Catherine Mahony,et al.  Case studies to test: A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[27]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  D W Gaylor,et al.  The use of Haber's law in standard setting and risk assessment. , 2000, Toxicology.

[29]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[30]  D. E. Clark Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena. 1. Prediction of intestinal absorption. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[31]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Mechanistic QSAR of aromatic amines: New models for discriminating between homocyclic mutagens and nonmutagens, and validation of models for carcinogens , 2007, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[32]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Feature Selection for Descriptor Based Classification Models. 2. Human Intestinal Absorption (HIA) , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[33]  J. Mulvihill,et al.  International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC publication No. 18. Review of the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of antischistosomal drugs; is there a case for a study of mutation epidemiology? Report of a task group on mutagenic antischistosomals. , 1991, Mutation research.

[34]  S Jacobi,et al.  REPDOSE: A database on repeated dose toxicity studies of commercial chemicals--A multifunctional tool. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[35]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Trust, But Verify: On the Importance of Chemical Structure Curation in Cheminformatics and QSAR Modeling Research , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  Gilles Klopman,et al.  ADME evaluation. 2. A computer model for the prediction of intestinal absorption in humans. , 2002, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[37]  A G Renwick,et al.  Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern--guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[38]  Sarfaraz Niazi - Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents , 2016 .

[39]  Chihae Yang,et al.  Building predictive models for protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors based on discriminating structural features by reassembling medicinal chemistry building blocks. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[41]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[42]  Carolyn Vickers,et al.  Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: A WHO/IPCS framework. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[43]  Joseph F Contrera,et al.  Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[44]  H. W. Taylor,et al.  Feeding tests in rats on mixtures of nitrite with secondary and tertiary amines of environmental importance. , 1977, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[45]  Judith C. Madden,et al.  In Silico Approaches for Predicting Adme Properties , 2010 .

[46]  Michael J. Morton,et al.  Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology , 2014 .

[47]  David W Gaylor,et al.  Comparison of cancer risk estimates based on a variety of risk assessment methodologies. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[48]  R. E. Duggan,et al.  Pesticide Residues in Food , 1973 .

[49]  Chrissavgi Triantafillou,et al.  Final Report of the research project , 2014 .

[50]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Use of Classification Regression Tree in Predicting Oral Absorption in Humans , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[51]  A. Zwart,et al.  Concentration—time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases , 1986 .

[52]  J. Schlatter,et al.  The significance of the subchronic toxicity in the dietary risk assessment of pesticides. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[53]  Bert-Jan Baars,et al.  Risk assessment of peak exposure to genotoxic carcinogens: a pragmatic approach. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[54]  D. Gott,et al.  UK Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) Symposium: Potential implications of obesity on persistent organic pollutant kinetics and possible ramifications for risk assessment , 2015 .

[55]  F Kalberlah,et al.  Time extrapolation and interspecies extrapolation for locally acting substances in case of limited toxicological data. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[56]  Yin-tak Woo,et al.  OncoLogic: A Mechanism-Based Expert System for Predicting the Carcinogenic Potential of Chemicals , 2005 .

[57]  J J Chen,et al.  Uncertainty in cancer risk estimates. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[58]  N. Kruhlak,et al.  Estimating the safe starting dose in phase I clinical trials and no observed effect level based on QSAR modeling of the human maximum recommended daily dose. , 2004, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[59]  Vijay K Gombar,et al.  In silico approaches to predicting cancer potency for risk assessment of genotoxic impurities in drug substances. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[60]  R Kroes,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. , 2007, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[61]  T. Ong Genetic activities of hycanthone and some other antischistosomal drugs. , 1978, Mutation research.

[62]  Worth Andrew,et al.  Review of QSAR Models and Software Tools for predicting Acute and Chronic Systemic Toxicity , 2010 .

[63]  Sean Ekins,et al.  Combined Computational Metabolite Prediction and Automated Structure-Based Analysis of Mass Spectrometric Data , 2008, Toxicology mechanisms and methods.

[64]  Robert M. Bruce,et al.  Assessment of the Oral Rat Chronic Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level Model in TOPKAT, a QSAR Software Package for Toxicity Prediction , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[65]  V. Poroikov,et al.  Robustness of Biological Activity Spectra Predicting by Computer Program PASS for Noncongeneric Sets of Chemical Compounds , 2000, Journal of chemical information and computer sciences.

[66]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[67]  G Beck,et al.  Evaluation of human intestinal absorption data and subsequent derivation of a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) with the Abraham descriptors. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[68]  Naomi L Kruhlak,et al.  Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling. , 2004, Current drug discovery technologies.

[69]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  Prediction of Harmful Human Health Effects of Chemicals from Structure , 2010 .

[70]  U. Norinder,et al.  Computational approaches to the prediction of the blood-brain distribution. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[71]  Romualdo Benigni,et al.  Assessment and Validation of US EPA's OncoLogic® Expert System and Analysis of Its Modulating Factors for Structural Alerts , 2012, Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews.

[72]  A Maunz,et al.  Prediction of chemical toxicity with local support vector regression and activity-specific kernels , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[73]  D. Young,et al.  Are the Chemical Structures in Your QSAR Correct , 2008 .

[74]  K R Przybylak,et al.  Assessing toxicological data quality: basic principles, existing schemes and current limitations , 2012, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[75]  Raghuraman Venkatapathy,et al.  Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[76]  Peter Willett,et al.  Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[77]  Paolo Mazzatorta,et al.  Modeling Oral Rat Chronic Toxicity. , 2009 .

[78]  N. Kruhlak,et al.  Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: I. QSAR estimation of the maximum recommended therapeutic dose (MRTD) and no effect level (NOEL) of organic chemicals based on clinical trial data. , 2004, Current drug discovery technologies.

[79]  C Helma,et al.  Predictive Models for Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity: Frameworks, State-of-the-Art, and Perspectives , 2009, Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews.

[80]  Helmut Segner,et al.  Data quality assessment for in silico methods: A survey of approaches and needs , 2010 .

[81]  Alan G E Wilson New Horizons in Predictive Toxicology: Current Status and Application , 2011 .

[82]  Sean Ekins Computational toxicology : risk assessment for pharmaceutical and environmental chemicals , 2007 .

[83]  Emilio Benfenati,et al.  The Expanding Role of Predictive Toxicology: An Update on the (Q)SAR Models for Mutagens and Carcinogens , 2007, Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews.

[84]  H R Pohl,et al.  Chemical risk assessment and uncertainty associated with extrapolation across exposure duration. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[85]  W Slob,et al.  Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal. , 2006, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[86]  Scott Boyer,et al.  Reaction Site Mapping of Xenobiotic Biotransformations. , 2007 .

[87]  M T D Cronin,et al.  A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent DNA binding , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[88]  Wout Slob,et al.  A comparison of ratio distributions based on the NOAEL and the benchmark approach for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[89]  G. Cruciani,et al.  MetaSite: understanding metabolism in human cytochromes from the perspective of the chemist. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[90]  P. Boydell Expanding role? , 2004, The Veterinary record.