The Influence of Clinical Information in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Neoplasms

Background We tested the relevance of clinical information in the histopathologic evaluation of melanocytic skin neoplasm (MSN). Methods Histopathologic specimens from 99 clinically atypical MSN were circulated among ten histopathologists; each case had clinical information available in a database with a five-step procedure (no information; age/sex/location; clinical diagnosis; clinical image; dermoscopic image); each step had a histopathologic diagnosis (D1 through D5); each diagnostic step had a level of diagnostic confidence (LDC) ranging from 1 (no diagnostic certainty) to 5 (absolute diagnostic certainty). The comparison of the LDC was employed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Findings In D1 (no information), 36/99 cases (36.3%) had unanimous diagnosis; in D5 (full information available), 51/99 cases (51.5%) had unanimous diagnosis (p for difference between proportions <0.001). The observer agreement expressed as kappa increased significantly from D1 to D5. The mean LDC linearly increased for each observer from D1 through D5 (p for linear trend <0.001). On average, each histopathologist changed his initial diagnosis in 7 cases (range: 2–23). Most diagnostic changes were in D2 (age/sex/location). Interpretation The histopathologic criteria for the diagnosis of MSN can work as such, but the final histopathologic diagnosis is a clinically-aided interpretation. Clinical data sometimes reverse the initial histopathologic evaluation.

[1]  David Weedon,et al.  Lentigines, nevi, and melanomas , 2010 .

[2]  I. Zalaudek,et al.  Lentiginous melanoma: a distinctive clinicopathological entity , 2008, Histopathology.

[3]  Daniela Massi,et al.  Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  R. Barnhill.  The Spitzoid Lesion: The Importance of Atypical Variants and Risk Assessment , 2006, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[5]  I. Zalaudek,et al.  The spectrum of Spitz nevi: a clinicopathologic study of 83 cases. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[6]  C. Massone,et al.  Limitations of histopathologic analysis in the recognition of melanoma: a plea for a combined diagnostic approach of histopathologic and dermoscopic evaluation. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[7]  Les Irwig,et al.  Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. , 2004, JAMA.

[8]  D. Elder,et al.  The approach to the patient with a difficult melanocytic lesion. , 2004, Pathology.

[9]  Giuseppe Argenziano,et al.  A pilot study of a combined dermoscopic–pathological approach to the telediagnosis of melanocytic skin neoplasms , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  R Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Clinically equivocal melanocytic skin lesions with features of regression: a dermoscopic–pathological study , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  Angela Ferrari,et al.  Dermoscopic and histopathologic diagnosis of equivocal melanocytic skin lesions , 2002, Cancer.

[12]  Dermoscopic-pathologic correlation: an atlas of 15 cases. , 2002, Clinics in dermatology.

[13]  A suggestion: look at the images first, before you read the history. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  A. Blum,et al.  Dermatoscopy turns histopathologist's attention to the suspicious area in melanocytic lesions. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  H. Kerl,et al.  Tutorial on melanocytic lesions. , 2001, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[16]  S S Raab,et al.  Effect of clinical history on diagnostic accuracy in the cytologic interpretation of bronchial brush specimens. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  M. Lowes,et al.  Benign melanocytic proliferative nodule within a congenital naevus , 2000, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[18]  H P Soyer,et al.  Clinicopathological correlation of pigmented skin lesions using dermoscopy. , 2000, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[19]  Giuseppe Argenziano,et al.  Interactive Atlas of Dermoscopy (Book and CD-ROM) , 2000 .

[20]  R. Drut,et al.  Adnexal-Centered Giant Congenital Melanocyte Nevus with Extensive Ganglioneuromatous Component and Trisomy 7 , 1999, Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society.

[21]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  The effect of clinical information on the histopathologic diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[22]  H. Kerl,et al.  Clinico-pathologic correlation of pigmented skin lesions using enhanced digital epiluminescence microscopy: 6 , 1997 .

[23]  E. Farmer,et al.  Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists. , 1996, Human pathology.

[24]  R. Corona,et al.  Interobserver variability on the histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Umberto Straccia,et al.  A model of information retrieval based on a terminological logic , 1993, SIGIR.

[26]  H Kerl,et al.  Surface Microscopy: A New Approach to the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Pigmented Tumors , 1989, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[27]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[28]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[29]  J. Fleiss.  Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[30]  B. Everitt,et al.  Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. , 1969 .

[31]  M. Schreiber,et al.  The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. , 1963, JAMA.

[32]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .