Outcrop fracture characterization using terrestrial laser scanners: Deep-water Jackfork sandstone at big rock quarry, Arkansas

Determination of fracture orientation can be an important aspect of structural analysis in reservoir characterization. The availability of ground-based laser scanner systems opens up new possibilities for the determination of fracture surface orientation in rock outcrops. Scanners are available in low-sample-density, low-accuracy, and fast, high-sample-density, high-accuracy models. These automatic laser scanner systems produce enormous volumes or “clouds” of point data at an instrument-dependent accuracy and resolution, which can be at the millimeter level. This huge volume of data calls for an automated and objective method of analysis. We have developed a surface classification algorithm based on a multipass partitioning of the point cloud. The method makes use of both spatial proximity and the orientation of an initial coarse-grained model of the point cloud. Unsupervised classification of surface sets is demonstrated herein using the new algorithm. Both previously mentioned types of scanners have been used to map the Jackfork sandstone outcrop at Big Rock Quarry in Little Rock, Arkansas. We apply the surface classification algorithm to these data to extract fracture surface orientations from the point cloud. The effectiveness of these new technologies when applied to fracture analysis is clearly demonstrated in this example. It is also shown that the low-density, low-resolution type of scanner is adequate to define general geomorphology but is inadequate for fracture definition. The surface classification algorithm can be used to reliably extract fracture and bedding strike and dip angles from the three-dimensional point locations acquired using centimeter-accurate, high-density laser scanner systems.

[1]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Creating virtual 3-D outcrop , 2000 .

[2]  David S. Schechter,et al.  Natural fractures in the Spraberry Formation, Midland basin, Texas: The effects of mechanical stratigraphy on fracture variability and reservoir behavior , 2002 .

[3]  G. McMechan,et al.  Integrated Study of Ancient Delta-Front Deposits, Using Outcrop, Ground-Penetrating Radar, and Three-Dimensional Photorealistic Data: Cretaceous Panther Tongue Sandstone, Utah, U.S.A. , 2005 .

[4]  Pankaj K. Agarwal,et al.  Exact and Approximation Algortihms for Clustering , 1997 .

[5]  Sudipto Guha,et al.  Techniques for Clustering Massive Data Sets , 2003, Clustering and Information Retrieval.

[6]  J. Suppe Principles of structural geology , 1984 .

[7]  Stephen E. Laubach,et al.  A scale-independent approach to fracture intensity and average spacing measurement , 2006 .

[8]  Terry Engelder,et al.  Stress Regimes in the Lithosphere , 1992 .

[9]  J. Coleman AAPG Memoir 72 / SEPM Special Publication No. 68, Chapter 3: Carboniferous Submarine Basin Development of the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas and Oklahoma , 2000 .

[10]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[11]  H. Bozdogan,et al.  Multi-sample cluster analysis using Akaike's Information Criterion , 1984 .

[12]  J. Cosgrove,et al.  Analysis of geological structures , 1989 .

[13]  Robert F. Ling,et al.  Cluster analysis algorithms for data reduction and classification of objects , 1981 .

[14]  R. Marrett,et al.  Prediction of macrofracture properties using microfracture information, Mesaverde Group sandstones, San Juan basin, New Mexico , 2000 .

[15]  N. Price Fault and Joint Development in Brittle and Semi-brittle Rock , 1966 .

[16]  Wayne Narr,et al.  Fracture density in the deep subsurface: Techniques with application to Point Arguello oil field , 1991 .

[17]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  Clustering and Information Retrieval , 2011, Network Theory and Applications.

[18]  Gonzalo Navarro,et al.  Clustering in Metric Spaces with Applications to Information Retrieval , 2003, Clustering and Information Retrieval.

[19]  Terry Engelder,et al.  Plate-scale stress fields driving the tectonic evolution of the central Ouachita salient, Oklahoma and Arkansas , 2006 .

[20]  G. Kitagawa,et al.  Akaike Information Criterion Statistics , 1988 .

[21]  Vincent Kanade,et al.  Clustering Algorithms , 2021, Wireless RF Energy Transfer in the Massive IoT Era.

[22]  Jorma Rissanen,et al.  The Minimum Description Length Principle in Coding and Modeling , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  M. Alba,et al.  COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES FOR TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING DATA GEOREFERENCING APPLIED TO 3-D MODELLING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE , 2007 .

[24]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[25]  D. Pollard,et al.  Imaging 3-D fracture networks around boreholes , 2002 .

[26]  N. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[27]  Clifford M. Hurvich Mean Square over Degrees of Freedom: New Perspectives on a Model Selection Treasure , 1997 .

[28]  Jorma Rissanen,et al.  A Predictive Least-Squares Principle , 1986 .

[29]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[30]  I. Lerche,et al.  A Method for Estimating Subsurface Fracture Density in Core , 1984 .

[31]  I. Trinks,et al.  Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork , 2005, Journal of the Geological Society.

[32]  David D. Pollard,et al.  Digital mapping of three-dimensional structures of the Chimney Rock fault system, central Utah , 2001 .

[33]  S. Laubach A Method to Detect Natural Fracture Strike in Sandstones , 1997 .