Home as a Platform: Levels of Automation for Connected Home Services

Tomorrow’s home will not only be a place to live, but will be a platform of services and experiences provided by an interconnected ecosystem of technologies. This platform requires a framework that describes and simplifies the types of homes and services which address consumers’ needs and provides current and future directions for researchers and practitioners. Although there have been some efforts to understand homes’ types and levels of automation, there is not a commonly established framework. In this paper, we propose a framework outlining types of homes and various levels of home automation: Electric homes, Customized homes, Proactive homes, Support homes, and Companion homes. This framework is built upon previous automation models and is supported by our expert interview panel. The first two levels describe current states and the next three levels discuss future directions and possibilities. Each level varies in terms of the complexity and intelligence of in-home technologies, their interaction and integration with one another as well as with the user, ability to process information based on the stages from information processing theory, and aspects of companionship that a home can provide to its residents. The proposed framework is the first step in achieving a standardized understanding of home automation across stakeholders.

[1]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  Devices and Data and Agents, Oh My , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[2]  Rita Yi Man Li,et al.  Sustainable Smart Home and Home Automation: Big Data Analytics Approach , 2016 .

[3]  Sahin Uyaver,et al.  A proof of concept for home automation system with implementation of the internet of things standards , 2018 .

[4]  Joseph F. Coughlin,et al.  Smarter Homes for Older Adults: Building a Framework Around Types and Levels of Autonomy , 2019, HCI.

[5]  U. Sonn,et al.  Towards an ADL taxonomy for occupational therapists , 2014, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[6]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[7]  D.H. Stefanov,et al.  The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  G Demiris,et al.  Smart Homes and Ambient Assisted Living in an Aging Society , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[9]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction , 2014, Journal of human-robot interaction.

[10]  Maria E. Niessen,et al.  Monitoring Activities of Daily Living in Smart Homes: Understanding human behavior , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  Victor A. Riley,et al.  A General Model of Mixed-Initiative Human-Machine Systems , 1989 .

[12]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[13]  Ali GhaffarianHoseini,et al.  The essence of future smart houses: from embedding ICT to adapting to sustainability principles , 2013 .

[14]  Abdelhamid Bouchachia,et al.  A review of smart homes in healthcare , 2015, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[15]  M. Rantz,et al.  Aging in place: a new model for long-term care. , 2000, Nursing administration quarterly.

[16]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[17]  James L. Crowley,et al.  A First-Person Experience with End-User Development for Smart Homes , 2016, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[18]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Benefits and risks of smart home technologies , 2017 .

[19]  Lazelle E Benefield,et al.  Aging in place: merging desire with reality. , 2014, The Nursing clinics of North America.

[20]  Renxi Qiu,et al.  User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home , 2012, HRI 2012.

[21]  Ryan W. Proud,et al.  Methods for Determining the Level of Autonomy to Design into a Human Spaceflight Vehicle: A Function Specific Approach , 2003 .