Why university lecturers enhance their teaching through the use of technology: a systematic review

The purpose of this systematic review is to add to current understanding of technology‐enhanced teaching through a process of synthesis and analysis of a collection of contemporary case studies set within university contexts. The justification to review case studies comes from Pinch and Bijker’s concept of the ‘social construction of technology’ as a way to structure the relationships between technological artefacts used in teaching and those social groups that shape their use. Basil Bernstein’s sociological theory of pedagogy provided the framework for the analysis of the case studies. His concepts of ‘classification’ which examines power relations between categories, such as agencies, agents, discourses and practices, and ‘framing’ which examines the control of instruction in relation to the selection, sequence, pacing and evaluation of learning and determines the relationship between teachers and students, were used as instruments for the analysis of the systematically chosen case studies.

[1]  Simon J. Thompson,et al.  Podcasting by synchronising PowerPoint and voice: What are the pedagogical benefits? , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[2]  C S Farah,et al.  Implementing digital technology to enhance student learning of pathology. , 2009, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[3]  Eric L. Dey,et al.  Bringing the Classroom to the Web: Effects of Using New Technologies to Capture and Deliver Lectures , 2009 .

[4]  Sally Doughty,et al.  Technological enhancements in the teaching and learning of reflective and creative practice in dance , 2008 .

[5]  E. Mitchell,et al.  An exploratory study of web-enhanced learning in undergraduate nurse education. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[6]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[7]  Parlo Singh,et al.  Pedagogising Knowledge: Bernstein's theory of the pedagogic device , 2002 .

[8]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Russell K. Schutt,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 2011 .

[10]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Implementation of the virtual learning environment into a UK orthodontic training programme: the postgraduate and lecturer perspective. , 2009, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[11]  Irwin Brown,et al.  Intended and unintended consequences of student use of an online questioning environment , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Angelika Kraemer,et al.  Happily Ever After: Integrating Language and Literature through Technology? , 2008 .

[13]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[14]  W. Bijker How is Technology Made?-That is the Question! , 2010 .

[15]  Gary Ferenchick,et al.  Just In Time: Technology to Disseminate Curriculum and Manage Educational Requirements With Mobile Technology , 2008, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[16]  Marie-Hélène Abel,et al.  Self‐regulated learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments: an investigation with university students , 2008 .

[17]  Cynthia Desrochers,et al.  Student Response Technology: Empirically grounded or just a gimmick? , 2008 .

[18]  Ömer Delialioglu,et al.  Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Jung P. Shim,et al.  Weblog Technology for Instruction, Learning, and Information Delivery* , 2009 .