Using the inertia of spacecraft during landing to penetrate regoliths of the Solar System

The high inertia, i.e. high mass and low speed, of a landing spacecraft has the potential to drive a penetrometer into the subsurface without the need for a dedicated deployment mechanism, e.g., during Huygens landing on Titan. Such a method could complement focused subsurface exploration missions, particularly in the low gravity environments of comets and asteroids, as it is conducive to conducting surveys and to the deployment of sensor networks. We make full-scale laboratory simulations of a landing spacecraft with a penetrometer attached to its base plate. The tip design is based on that used in terrestrial Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) with a large enough shaft diameter to house instruments for analysing pristine subsurface material. Penetrometer measurements are made in a variety of regolith analogue materials and target compaction states. For comparison a copy of the ACC-E penetrometer from the Huygens mission to Titan is used. A test rig at the Open University is used and is operated over a range of speeds from 0.9 to 3 m s−1 and under two gravitational accelerations. The penetrometer was found to be sensitive to the target’s compaction state with a high degree of repeatability. The penetrometer measurements also produced unique pressure profile shapes for each material. Measurements in limestone powder produced an exponential increase in pressure with depth possibly due to increasing compaction with depth. Measurements in sand produced an almost linear increase in pressure with depth. Iron powder produced significantly higher pressures than sand presumably due to the rough surface of the grains increasing the grain-grain friction. Impacts into foamglas produced with both ACC-E and the large penetrometer produced an initial increase in pressure followed by a leveling off as expected in a consolidated material. Measurements in sand suggest that the pressure on the tip is not significantly dependent on speed over the range tested, which suggests bearing strength equations could be applied to impact penetrometry in sand-like regoliths. In terms of performance we find the inertia of a landing spacecraft, with a mass of 100 kg, is adequate to penetrate regoliths expected on the surface of Solar System bodies. Limestone powder, an analogue for a dusty surface, offered very little resistance allowing full penetration of the target container. Both iron powder, representing a stronger coarse grained regolith, and foamglas, representing a consolidated comet crust, could be penetrated to similar depths of around two to three tip diameters. Speed tests suggest a linear dependence of penetration depth on impact speed.

[1]  R. Reedy,et al.  THE LUNAR REGOLITH , 2012 .

[2]  A. Harri,et al.  Investigating thermal properties of gas-filled planetary regoliths using a thermal probe , 2012 .

[3]  J. Borg,et al.  Dust from comet Wild 2: Interpreting particle size, shape, structure, and composition from impact features on the Stardust aluminum foils , 2008 .

[4]  Howard A. Perko Effects of surface cleanliness on lunar regolith mechanics , 1996 .

[5]  Jerome B. Johnson A STATISTICAL MICROMECHANICAL THEORY OF CONE PENETRATION IN GRANULAR MATERIALS , 2003 .

[6]  S. Noble The Lunar Regolith , 2009 .

[7]  R. Anderson,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation , 2012 .

[8]  R. Lorenz,et al.  Planetary Landers and Entry Probes: Index , 2007 .

[9]  Alain Puech,et al.  Refined Model for Interpreting Shallow Penetration CPTs in Sands , 2002 .

[10]  B. Rozitis,et al.  Cohesive forces prevent the rotational breakup of rubble-pile asteroid (29075) 1950 DA , 2014, Nature.

[11]  Günter Kargl,et al.  Using the anchoring device of a comet lander to determine surface mechanical properties , 1997 .

[12]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Planetary penetrators: Their origins, history and future , 2011 .

[13]  C. A. Pearse Photometry and polarimetry of the moon and their relationship to physical properties of the lunar surface , 1963 .

[14]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Target effects during penetrator emplacement: heating, triboelectric charging, and mechanical disruption , 2002 .

[15]  R. S. Kremnev,et al.  Mars-96 mission: Mars exploration with the use of penetrators , 1998 .

[16]  John C. Zarnecki,et al.  An impact penetrometer for a landing spacecraft , 1994 .

[17]  Karen E. Daniels,et al.  Rubble-Pile Near Earth Objects: Insights from Granular Physics , 2013 .

[18]  Eric Hand,et al.  Planetary Science. Philae probe makes bumpy touchdown on a comet. , 2014, Science.

[19]  Gary S Grest,et al.  Confined granular packings: structure, stress, and forces. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  M. Gui,et al.  BEARING CAPACITY OF FOUNDATIONS ON SAND USING THE METHOD OF SLIP LINE , 2006 .

[21]  Thomas J. Ahrens,et al.  Emplacement of penetrators into planetary surfaces , 1996 .

[22]  V. Chevrier,et al.  Penetration Testing in Martian Analog Material , 2010 .

[23]  Andrew J. Ball,et al.  Penetrometry in the solar system , 1999 .

[24]  E. B. Mayfield,et al.  Dynamics of a Projectile Penetrating Sand , 1957 .

[25]  David C. Catling,et al.  Deep space 2: The Mars Microprobe Mission , 1999 .

[26]  J. David Rogers,et al.  Subsurface Exploration using the Standard Penetration Test and the Cone Penetrometer Test , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas Keller,et al.  Impact penetrometry on a comet nucleus — interpretation of laboratory data using penetration models , 2001 .

[28]  R. H. Jones Lunar surface mechanical properties from Surveyor data , 1971 .

[29]  Simon F. Green,et al.  Computer modelling of a penetrator thermal sensor , 2010 .

[30]  Günter Kargl,et al.  A soft solid surface on Titan as revealed by the Huygens Surface Science Package , 2005, Nature.

[31]  William T. Pike,et al.  Penetrometry in the solar system II , 2009 .

[32]  Rolando Gelmi,et al.  MOONBIT—Seismic while Drilling (SWD) Laboratory Testing with Lunar Regolith Simulant , 2010 .

[33]  Luís Eça,et al.  Prediction of resistance coefficients in ship hydrodynamics , 2009 .

[34]  S. Green,et al.  Microstructural penetrometry of asteroid regolith analogues and Titan ’ s surface Journal Item , 2018 .

[35]  M. Banaszkiewicz,et al.  Mupus – A Thermal and Mechanical Properties Probe for the Rosetta Lander Philae , 2007 .

[36]  Hans Rickman,et al.  Determining the geotechnical properties of planetary regolith using Low Velocity Penetrometers , 2014 .