Predicting IUCN Extinction Risk Categories for the World's Data Deficient Groupers (Teleostei: Epinephelidae)

Groupers are highly susceptible to human‐induced impacts, making them one of the most threatened fish families globally. Extinction risk assessments are important in endangered threatened species management, however the most comprehensive—the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List—cannot classify approximately one‐third of grouper species due to data deficiency. We used an ordinal analytical approach to model relationships between species‐level traits and extinction risk categories. We found that larger species and those with shallower maximum depths and smaller geographic ranges had higher extinction risk. Using our best fitting model, we classified data deficient grouper species into IUCN's extinction risk categories based on traits. Most of these species were predicted to be of least concern. However, 12% were predicted to be endangered or vulnerable, suggesting that they may be of conservation interest. Importantly, we provide a quantitative method for overcoming data gaps that can be applied to conservation of other species.

[1]  M. Abt.  Reef Fish Spawning Aggregations Biology Research And Management , 2016 .

[2]  C. Orme,et al.  Cost‐effective assessment of extinction risk with limited information , 2015 .

[3]  L. Gerhardinger,et al.  Depletion of marine megafauna and shifting baselines among artisanal fishers in eastern Brazil , 2015 .

[4]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Towards a general framework for predicting threat status of data-deficient species from phylogenetic, spatial and environmental information , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  T. J. Webb,et al.  Global Patterns of Extinction Risk in Marine and Non-marine Systems , 2015, Current Biology.

[6]  C. Orme,et al.  Predicting the conservation status of data‐deficient species , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[7]  C. Mora,et al.  Extinction risk in reef fishes , 2015 .

[8]  D. Bickford,et al.  Amphibians over the edge: silent extinction risk of Data Deficient species , 2014 .

[9]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Knowledge behind conservation status decisions: Data basis for “Data Deficient” Brazilian plant species , 2014 .

[10]  Euan S. Harvey,et al.  Depth Refuge and the Impacts of SCUBA Spearfishing on Coral Reef Fishes , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  D. Brito,et al.  Unraveling the conservation status of Data Deficient species , 2013 .

[13]  Á. Bertoncini,et al.  Fishing groupers towards extinction: a global assessment of threats and extinction risks in a billion dollar fishery , 2013 .

[14]  Terry P. Hughes,et al.  Call to protect all coral reefs , 2013 .

[15]  F. Mayer,et al.  Biological attributes and major threats as predictors of the vulnerability of species: a case study with Brazilian reef fishes , 2013, Oryx.

[16]  Benjamin L. Richards,et al.  The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: an assessment of coral reef fishes in the US Pacific Islands , 2013, Coral Reefs.

[17]  David J. Hand,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Classification Methods , 2012 .

[18]  E. Meijaard,et al.  Are comparative studies of extinction risk useful for conservation? , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  D. Brito.  Overcoming the Linnean shortfall: Data deficiency and biological survey priorities , 2010 .

[20]  E. Madin,et al.  Field evidence for pervasive indirect effects of fishing on prey foraging behavior. , 2010, Ecology.

[21]  T. Brooks,et al.  Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List , 2008 .

[22]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  C. Stallings.  Indirect effects of an exploited predator on recruitment of coral-reef fishes. , 2008, Ecology.

[24]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  T. Good,et al.  Addressing Data Deficiency in Classifying Extinction Risk: a Case Study of a Radiation of Bignoniaceae from Madagascar , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[27]  Michael Hoffmann,et al.  The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  C. Roberts,et al.  Using fishers' anecdotes, naturalists' observations and grey literature to reassess marine species at risk: the case of the Gulf grouper in the Gulf of California, Mexico , 2005 .

[29]  I. Owens,et al.  The comparative method in conservation biology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Limits to the use of threatened species lists , 2002 .

[31]  M. Rudd,et al.  The Impact of Nassau Grouper Size and Abundance on Scuba Diver Site Selection and MPA Economics , 2002 .

[32]  P. Levin,et al.  CHAPTER 17 – Reef Fish Ecology and Grouper Conservation and Management , 2002 .

[33]  V. Clark,et al.  The threatened status of restricted‐range coral reef fish species , 2000 .

[34]  S. Jennings,et al.  Predicting the Vulnerability of Tropical Reef Fishes to Exploitation with Phylogenies and Life Histories , 1999 .