Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.
[2] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] T. Houtgast,et al. The Modulation Transfer Function in Room Acoustics as a Predictor of Speech Intelligibility , 1973 .
[4] Ronald W. Schafer,et al. Design and simulation of a speech analysis-synthesis system based on short-time Fourier analysis , 1973 .
[5] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Jae S. Lim,et al. Signal estimation from modified short-time Fourier transform , 1983, ICASSP.
[7] T. Houtgast,et al. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .
[8] R. Plomp. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[9] C. Schreiner,et al. Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. I. The anterior auditory field (AAF) , 1986, Hearing Research.
[10] D. Grantham,et al. Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] S. Sheft,et al. Temporal integration in amplitude modulation detection. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems , 1993, Speech Commun..
[13] C Ludvigsen,et al. Evaluation of a noise reduction method--comparison between observed scores and scores predicted from STI. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[14] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Misha Pavel,et al. Intelligibility of speech with filtered time trajectories of spectral envelopes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.
[17] S. Shamma,et al. Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Characteristics of single-unit responses to moving ripple spectra. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.
[18] Shihab A. Shamma. Auditory cortical representation of complex acoustic spectra as inferred from the ripple analysis method , 1996 .
[19] T. Dau,et al. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] S A Shamma,et al. Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.
[21] Les E. Atlas,et al. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2003:7, 668–675 c ○ 2003 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Joint Acoustic and Modulation Frequency , 2003 .
[22] Nima Mesgarani,et al. Speech enhancement based on filtering the spectrotemporal modulations , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..
[23] Yi Hu,et al. Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms , 2007, Speech Commun..
[24] Tammo Houtgast,et al. A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Yi Hu,et al. A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Philipos C. Loizou,et al. Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice , 2007 .
[27] R. Bentler,et al. Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[28] Y. Hu,et al. TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING THE IDEAL BINARY MASK , 2008 .
[29] T. Houtgast,et al. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] P. Loizou,et al. Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Yang Lu,et al. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Deliang Wang,et al. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] M. Schönwiesner,et al. Spectro-temporal modulation transfer function of single voxels in the human auditory cortex measured with high-resolution fMRI , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[34] Frédéric E. Theunissen,et al. The Modulation Transfer Function for Speech Intelligibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[35] Kuldip K. Paliwal,et al. Single-channel speech enhancement using spectral subtraction in the short-time modulation domain , 2010, Speech Commun..
[36] Kuldip K. Paliwal,et al. Role of modulation magnitude and phase spectrum towards speech intelligibility , 2011, Speech Commun..
[37] Torsten Dau,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.