The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities

In this chapter, we consider the independent and interactive effects of internal categorisations (how people see themselves) and external categorisations (how they are categorised by others) on social behaviour. Our point of departure is that people do not necessarily accept external categorisations that are imposed upon them (regardless of whether these refer to artificially constructed or naturally occurring groups) and that this affects their willingness to invest in the group. We first outline different reasons people may have to behave in line with externally imposed group memberships. Subsequently, we examine how self-presentation motives may interfere with identity expression, as people consider different social norms, different audiences, and the psychological costs associated with the management of their social identities. We conclude by delineating the conditions under which external categorisations can be internalised by targets, depending on the interplay of multiple identities as well as the way people are treated by others.

[1]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1882, Nature.

[2]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[4]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. , 1976 .

[5]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[6]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[7]  Mary Anne Devanna Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[8]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[10]  B. R. Schlenker Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[11]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Stigma: A Social Psychological Analysis , 1981 .

[12]  R. Baumeister A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[13]  H. Schreiber,et al.  Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against, or by differentiation from outgroups , 1983 .

[14]  A. Mummendey,et al.  ‘Different‘ just means ‘better’: Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in‐group favouritism , 1984 .

[15]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Theoretical contributions: A five‐stage model of intergroup relations , 1984 .

[16]  Delia S. Saenz,et al.  Memory deficits and memory surfeits: differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  G. Breakwell Coping With Threatened Identities , 1986 .

[18]  G. Finchilescu Effect of incompatibility between internal and external group membership criteria on intergroup behaviour , 1986 .

[19]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis.' , 1986 .

[20]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .

[21]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[22]  J. Phinney Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  J. Crocker,et al.  Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. , 1990 .

[24]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[25]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence , 1990 .

[26]  M. Diehl The Minimal Group Paradigm: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings , 1990 .

[27]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Person Categorization and Stereotyping , 1990 .

[28]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[29]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[30]  N. Hutnik Ethnic Minority Identity: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1992 .

[31]  J. Gerton,et al.  Psychological impact of biculturalism: evidence and theory. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  N. Ellemers The Influence of Socio-structural Variables on Identity Management Strategies , 1993 .

[33]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Sources of Resistance to Mergers Between Groups1 , 1994 .

[34]  Mark Levine,et al.  On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. , 1994 .

[35]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[36]  Mark Levine,et al.  Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out‐group , 1994 .

[37]  John C. Turner,et al.  Stereotyping and Social Reality , 1994 .

[38]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations , 1995 .

[39]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[40]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  S. Reicher,et al.  Adolescence and Delinquency: The Collective Management of Reputation , 1995 .

[42]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[43]  J. J. Seta,et al.  Big fish in small ponds: a social hierarchy analysis of intergroup bias. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  A. Manstead,et al.  Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. , 1996 .

[46]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility , 1996 .

[47]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer? , 1996 .

[48]  N. Ellemers,et al.  The effects of group membership and social context on information organization , 1997 .

[49]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Sticking Together or Falling Apart: In-Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual Mobility , 1997 .

[50]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The social psychology of stereotyping and group life , 1998 .

[51]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification , 1997 .

[52]  M. Verkuyten Discourses of ethnic minority identity , 1997 .

[53]  E. Holmes,et al.  Individual strategies for coping with the stigma of severe mental illness , 1998 .

[54]  K. Deaux,et al.  Negotiating Social Identity , 1998 .

[55]  S. Reicher,et al.  More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in‐group , 1998 .

[56]  C. Stangor,et al.  Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations , 1998 .

[57]  P. Devine,et al.  Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice , 1998 .

[58]  James D. Lee,et al.  protecting one's self from a stigmatized disease… once one has it , 2002 .

[59]  M. Wenzel,et al.  Social Discrimination and Tolerance in Intergroup Relations: Reactions to Intergroup Difference , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[60]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The context and content of social identity threat , 1999 .

[61]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories , 1999 .

[62]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[63]  D M Wegner,et al.  Covering up what can't be seen: concealable stigma and mental control. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  B. Major,et al.  Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[66]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Commitment and strategic responses to social context. , 1999 .

[67]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content , 1999 .

[68]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. , 1999 .

[69]  Todd F. Heatherton,et al.  The hidden costs of hidden stigma. , 2000 .

[70]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations , 2000 .

[71]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  You Can’t Always Do What You Want: Social Identity and Self-Presentational Determinants of the Choice to Work for a Low-Status Group , 2000 .

[72]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification , 2000 .

[73]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in Social Context: Identity needs versus Audience constraints , 2000 .

[74]  N. D. de Vries,et al.  When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going: Social Identification and Individual Effort in Intergroup Competition , 2000 .

[75]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  The (Il)legitimacy of ingroup bias - From social reality to social resistance , 2001 .

[76]  Victor J. Callan,et al.  Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective , 2001 .

[77]  O. Klein,et al.  The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: how group members attempt to tailor an out-group's representation of themselves. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[78]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Context Effects on the Application of Stereotype Content to Multiple Categorizable Targets , 2002 .

[79]  S. Paxton The paradox of public HIV disclosure , 2002, AIDS care.

[80]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Intragroup and Intergroup Evaluation Effects on Group Behavior , 2002 .

[81]  N. Ellemers,et al.  The benefits of being disadvantaged: performance‐related circumstances and consequences of intergroup comparisons , 2002 .

[82]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Social identity as both cause and effect: the development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[83]  N. Ellemers,et al.  The Impact of Respect Versus Neglect of Self-Identities on Identification and Group Loyalty , 2002 .

[84]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[86]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[87]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Organizational Identification following a Merger: The Importance of Agreeing to Differ , 2003 .

[88]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The underrepresentation of women in science: differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[89]  B. Major,et al.  The social psychology of stigma. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[90]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Small Group , 2018, Understanding Group Behavior.