The Benefits of Social Influence in Optimized Cultural Markets

Social influence has been shown to create significant unpredictability in cultural markets, providing one potential explanation why experts routinely fail at predicting commercial success of cultural products. As a result, social influence is often presented in a negative light. Here, we show the benefits of social influence for cultural markets. We present a policy that uses product quality, appeal, position bias and social influence to maximize expected profits in the market. Our computational experiments show that our profit-maximizing policy leverages social influence to produce significant performance benefits for the market, while our theoretical analysis proves that our policy outperforms in expectation any policy not displaying social signals. Our results contrast with earlier work which focused on showing the unpredictability and inequalities created by social influence. Not only do we show for the first time that, under our policy, dynamically showing consumers positive social signals increases the expected profit of the seller in cultural markets. We also show that, in reasonable settings, our profit-maximizing policy does not introduce significant unpredictability and identifies “blockbusters”. Overall, these results shed new light on the nature of social influence and how it can be leveraged for the benefits of the market.

[1]  S. Farrell,et al.  Social influence benefits the wisdom of individuals in the crowd , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M. Heinemann The Matthew Effect , 2016, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

[3]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Leveraging Position Bias to Improve Peer Recommendation , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Sandra González Bailón Reseña de "Everything is Obvious. Once You Know the Answer. How Common Sense Fails Us" de Duncan J. Watts , 2012 .

[5]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Leading the Herd Astray: An Experimental Study of Self-fulfilling Prophecies in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2008, Social psychology quarterly.

[6]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Web-Based Experiments for the Study of Collective Social Dynamics in Cultural Markets , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Abraham P. Punnen,et al.  A strongly polynomial simplex method for the linear fractional assignment problem , 2008, Oper. Res. Lett..

[8]  A. D. Vany Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry , 2003 .

[9]  W. Herman,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Relative Risk of Mortality for Type 1 Diabetes Patients Compared to the General Population: Exploring Temporal Changes in Relative Mortality , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Richard A. Peterson,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Evidence from the Popular Music Industry , 1971 .

[11]  W. Bielby,et al.  "All Hits Are Flukes": Institutionalized Decision Making and the Rhetoric of Network Prime-Time Program Development , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  M. C. Jensen Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency , 1978 .

[13]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment , 2013, Science.

[14]  P. Hirsch Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Reply to Farrell: Improved individual estimation success can imply collective tunnel vision , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Maiko Shigeno,et al.  An Algorithm for Fractional Assignment Problems , 1995, Discret. Appl. Math..

[17]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors? , 1997 .

[18]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance , 2002 .

[19]  Peter Hedström,et al.  Experimental Macro Sociology: Predicting the Next Best Seller , 2006, Science.

[20]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Book Review , 2001 .

[21]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everything is obvious : how common sense fails , 2011 .

[22]  Soong Moon Kang,et al.  Field experiments of success-breeds-success dynamics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Galen Pickard,et al.  Quantifying Social Influence in an Online Cultural Market , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.