Area-based quality control of airborne laser scanning 3D models for different land classes using terrestrial laser scanning: sample survey in Houston, USA

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is a remote-sensing technique that provides scale-accurate 3D models consisting of dense point clouds with x, y planimetric coordinates and altitude z. Using ALS, very high-resolution (VHR) digital surface models (DSMs) have been widely used for commercial and scientific applications since the early 1990s. Although there is widespread usage, there has been little comprehensive investigation of quality control for ALS DSMs in the literature, as most studies have been limited to assessing point-based vertical accuracy. This article is dedicated to investigating the quality of ALS DSMs for different land classes using statistical and visual approaches based on absolute and relative vertical accuracy metrics. Rather than a limited number of ground control points (GCP), the model-to-model-based approach is applied and DSMs derived from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point clouds that have around 5 mm absolute and 3 mm relative geolocation accuracy were used as the reference data for comparison. The results demonstrate that in open, grass, and building land classes, the ALS DSMs reached both standard deviation (σ) and normalized median absolute deviation (NMAD) of 3–5 cm after the elimination of any systematic biases. This result sufficiently satisfies the vertical accuracy requirements for 1/1000-scale topographic maps determined by National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP) specifications. In tall vegetation, a higher number of discrepancies larger than 0.5 m exist, reversing the relation between σ and NMAD. These vegetation errors also do not appear to be normally distributed. As an additional investigation, the performance of ALS DEMs under dense high-vegetation areas was assessed. These under-canopy ALS DEMs, created using only classified ground returns, offer both σ and NMAD of 12–14 cm, a performance level that is difficult to achieve under-canopy using photogrammetric techniques.

[1]  Paul E. LaRocque,et al.  MEETING THE ACCURACY CHALLENGE IN AIRBORNE LIDAR BATHYMETRY , 2000 .

[2]  G. Mandlburger,et al.  Airborne Hydrographic LiDAR Mapping-Potential of a new technique for capturing shallow water bodies , 2011 .

[3]  Camillo RESSLa,et al.  QUALITY CHECKING OF ALS PROJECTS USING STATISTICS OF STRIP DIFFERENCES , 2008 .

[4]  C. Glennie Rigorous 3D error analysis of kinematic scanning LIDAR systems , 2007 .

[5]  C. Arrowsmith,et al.  Vertical accuracy assessment of LiDAR ground points using minimum distance approach , 2014 .

[6]  K. Jacobsen CHARACTERISTICS OF NEARLY WORLD WIDE AVAILABE DIGITAL HEIGHT MODELS , 2012 .

[7]  HANS-GERD MAAS Planimetric and height accuracy of airborne laserscanner data : User requirements and system performance , 2003 .

[8]  U. Lohr,et al.  Digital Elevation Models By Laser Scanning , 1998 .

[9]  Cetin Mekik,et al.  Investigation on Accuracies of Real Time Kinematic GPS for GIS Applications , 2009, Remote. Sens..

[10]  ANALYSIS AND RECOVERY OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN AIRBORNE LASER SYSTEM , 2008 .

[11]  J. Trinder,et al.  AIRBORNE LIDAR AS A TOOL FOR DISASTER MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT , 2011 .

[12]  K. Jacobsen CHARACTERISTICS OF WORLDWIDE AND NEARLY WORLDWIDE HEIGHT MODELS , 2013 .

[13]  E. J. Huising,et al.  Errors and accuracy estimates of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications , 1998 .

[14]  Petri Rönnholm,et al.  Evaluating the Correctness of Airborne Laser Scanning Data Heights Using Vehicle-Based RTK and VRS GPS Observations , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[15]  U. Sefercik,et al.  Advanced analysis of differences between C and X bands using SRTM data for mountainous topography , 2009 .

[16]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  Comparison of Matching Algorithms for DSM Generation in Urban Areas from Ikonos Imagery , 2010 .

[17]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Airborne laser scanning and usefulness for hydrological models , 2005 .

[18]  Joseph M. Hellerstein,et al.  Quantitative Data Cleaning for Large Databases , 2008 .

[19]  T. Schenk,et al.  IMPROVEMENT OF AUTOMATIC DSM GENERATION OVER URBAN AREAS USING AIRBORNE LASER SCANNER DATA , 2000 .

[20]  Claus Brenner,et al.  Generation Of 3D City Models From Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 1997 .

[21]  William Eugene Carter,et al.  Geodetic imaging with airborne LiDAR: the Earth's surface revealed , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[22]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  LAND COVER DEPENDENT DERIVATION OF DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS FROM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA , 2010 .

[23]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Methods of airborne laser scanning for forest information extraction , 2006 .

[24]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[25]  Howard A. Zebker,et al.  Comparison of elevation derived from INSAR data with DEM over large relief terrain , 1994 .

[26]  K. Jacobsen DEM generation from satellite data , 2003 .

[27]  M. J. Valadan Zoej,et al.  BARE EARTH EXTRACTION FROM AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA USING DIFFERENT FILTERING METHODS , 2008 .

[28]  Xiaoye Liu,et al.  Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues , 2008 .

[29]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  The Forward Propagation of Integrated System Component Errors within Airborne Lidar Data , 2010 .

[30]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Progress in LiDAR Sensor Technology – Chance and Challenge for DTM Generation and Data Administration , 2007 .

[31]  J. Brasington,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets , 2009 .

[32]  J. Shan,et al.  Urban DEM generation from raw lidar data: A labeling algorithm and its performance , 2005 .

[33]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  INVESTIGATING ADJUSTMENT OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING STRIPS WITHOUT USAGE OF GNSS/IMU TRAJECTORY DATA , 2009 .

[34]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  APPLYING 3D AFFINE TRANSFORMATION AND LEAST SQUARES MATCHING FOR AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING STRIPS ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT GNSS/IMU TRAJECTORY DATA , 2012 .

[35]  Mark D. McCoy,et al.  Airborne lidar survey of irrigated agricultural landscapes: an application of the slope contrast method , 2011 .

[36]  J. M. Hill,et al.  Wide-area topographic mapping and applications using airborne light detection and ranging (LIDAR) technology , 2000 .

[37]  Charles K. Toth,et al.  Improvement of Lidar Data Accuracy Using Lidar-Specific Ground Targets , 2007 .

[38]  Lars T. Waser,et al.  High‐quality image matching and automated generation of 3D tree models , 2008 .