Quantification of within- and between-pen transmission of Foot-and-Mouth disease virus in pigs.

Quantified transmission parameters of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) are needed for epidemic models used for control and surveillance. In this study, we quantified the within- and between-pen transmission of FMDV in groups of pigs by estimating the daily transmission rate beta, i.e. the number of secondary infections caused by one infectious pig during one day, using an SIR (susceptible-infectious-removed) model. Within-pen transmission was studied in four groups of ten pigs in which 5 infected and 5 susceptible pigs had direct contact; between-pen transmission was studied in one group of ten pigs in which 5 infected and 5 susceptible pigs had indirect contact. Daily results of virus isolation of oropharyngeal fluid were used to quantify the transmission rate beta, using Generalised Linear Modelling (GLM) and a maximum likelihood method. In addition, we estimated the expected time to infection of the first pig within a pen T(w) and in the indirect-contact pen T(b). The between-pen transmission rate beta(b) was estimated to be 0.59 (0.083-4.18) per day, which was significantly lower than the within-pen transmission rate beta(w) of 6.14 (3.75-10.06). T(w) was 1.6 h, and T(b) was 16 h. Our results show that the transmission rate is influenced by contact structure between pigs.

[1]  A Bouma,et al.  Vaccination of pigs two weeks before infection significantly reduces transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus. , 2004, Vaccine.

[2]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  No foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission between individually housed calves. , 2004, Veterinary microbiology.

[3]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. , 2003, Journal of comparative pathology.

[4]  M C M de Jong,et al.  Within- and between-pen transmission of Classical Swine Fever Virus: a new method to estimate the basic reproduction ratio from transmission experiments , 2002, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  A de Kruif,et al.  An experimental infection with classical swine fever virus in weaner pigs. I. Transmission of the virus, course of the disease, and antibody response. , 1998, The Veterinary quarterly.

[6]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  Design and analysis of an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae transmission experiment. , 2003, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[7]  P. D. de Leeuw,et al.  Vaccination of pigs with formaldehyde inactivated aluminium hydroxide foot-and-mouth disease vaccines, potentiated with diethylaminoethyldextran (DEAE-D). , 2010, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B.

[8]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Relative resistance of pigs to infection by natural aerosols of FMD virus , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[9]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  Vaccination against foot and mouth disease reduces virus transmission in groups of calves. , 2005, Vaccine.

[10]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  Implications derived from a mathematical model for eradication of pseudorabies virus. , 1998, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.

[11]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[12]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[13]  S. Cornell,et al.  Dynamics of the 2001 UK Foot and Mouth Epidemic: Stochastic Dispersal in a Heterogeneous Landscape , 2001, Science.

[14]  T. Kimman,et al.  Experimental quantification of vaccine-induced reduction in virus transmission. , 1994, Vaccine.

[15]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[16]  A. de Kruif,et al.  Experimental infection of slaughter pigs with classical swine fever virus: transmission of the virus, course of the disease and antibody response , 1999, Veterinary Record.

[17]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  The Foot-and-Mouth Epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of Spread and Impact of Interventions , 2001, Science.

[18]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain , 2001, Nature.