Factors influencing timing resolution in a commercial LSO PET camera

The CPS Accel is a commercial PET camera based on a block detector with 64 LSO scintillator crystals (each 6.75/spl times/6.75/spl times/25 mm) read out with 4 photomultiplier tubes. The excellent timing resolution of LSO suggests that this camera might be used for time-of-flight (TOF) PET, thereby reducing the statistical noise significantly. Although the Accel achieves 3 ns coincidence resolution (a factor of two better than BGO-based PET cameras), its timing resolution is nearly an order of magnitude worse than that demonstrated with individual LSO crystals. This paper quantifies the effect on the timing of each component in the Accel timing chain to identify which components most limit the camera's timing resolution. The components in the timing chain are: the scintillator crystal, the photomultiplier tube (PMT), the constant fraction discriminator (CFD), and the time to digital converter (TDC). To measure the contribution of each component, we construct a single crystal test system with high-performance versions of these components. This system achieves 221 ps FWHM coincidence timing resolution, which is used as a baseline measurement. One of the high-performance components is replaced by a production component, the coincidence timing resolution is re-measured, and the difference between measurements is the contribution of that (production) component. We find that the contributions of the TDC, CFD, PMT, and scintillator are 2000 ps, 1354 ps, 422 ps, and 326 ps FWHM, respectively, and that the overall timing resolution scales like the square root of the amount of scintillation light detected by the PMT. Based on these measurements we predict that the limit for the coincidence timing resolution in a practical, commercial, LSO-based PET camera is 528 ps FWHM.

[1]  K. Wienhard,et al.  Performance results of a new DOI detector block for a high resolution PET-LSO research tomograph HRRT , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  Lars Eriksson,et al.  Performance evaluation of a new LSO high resolution research tomograph-HRRT , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[3]  Michael E. Casey,et al.  A 10-mc/s, 0.5-/spl mu/m CMOS constant-fraction discriminator having built-in pulse tail cancellation , 2001 .

[4]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Physical characteristics of TTV03, a new high spatial resolution time-of-flight positron tomograph , 1990 .

[5]  C. Thompson,et al.  Measurements on the timing stability of the MicroPET R4 animal PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[6]  W. Moses,et al.  LaBr/sub 3/:Ce scintillators for gamma ray spectroscopy , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  Michel M. Ter-Pogossian,et al.  Super PETT I: A Positron Emission Tomograph Utilizing Photon Time-of-Flight Information , 1982 .

[8]  W. Moses,et al.  RbGd{sub 2}Br{sub 7}:Ce scintillators for gamma ray and thermal neutron detection , 2002 .

[9]  R. F. Post,et al.  Statistical Limitations on the Resolving Time of a Scintillation Counter , 1950 .

[10]  R. Nutt,et al.  Scintillation properties of LSO:Ce boules , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[11]  The Super PET 3000‐E: A PET Scanner Designed for High Count Rate Cardiac Applications , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Hongdi Li,et al.  PET resolution and image quality optimization study for different detector block geometries and DOI designs , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[13]  J. W. Young,et al.  FPGA based front-end electronics for a high resolution PET scanner , 1999 .

[14]  R. K. Hartz,et al.  Dynamic Imaging with High Resolution Time-of-Flight PET Camera - TOFPET I , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  W. Moses,et al.  LaCl3:Ce scintillator for γ-ray detection , 2003 .

[16]  Nizar A. Mullani,et al.  DESIGN OF TOFPET: A HIGH RESOLUTION TIME-OF-FLIGHT POSITRON CAMERA. , 1982 .

[17]  N. Mullani,et al.  Image improvement and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Potential for RbGd2Br7:Ce, LaBr3:Ce, LaBr3:Ce, and LuI3:Ce in nuclear medical imaging , 2005 .

[19]  J. M. Rochelle,et al.  Performance characteristics of a new generation of processing circuits for PET applications , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[20]  J. Glodo,et al.  LuI/sub 3/:Ce-a new scintillator for gamma ray spectroscopy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[21]  L. G. Hyman,et al.  Study of High Speed Photomultiplier Systems , 1964 .

[22]  C. Melcher,et al.  Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: a fast, efficient new scintillator , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[23]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Time-of-flight PET. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[24]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[25]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Performance assessment of pixelated LaBr/sub 3/ detector modules for TOF PET , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[26]  M. Moszynski,et al.  Timing properties of GSO, LSO and other Ce doped scintillators , 1996 .

[27]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Scintillators for Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy , 2005 .

[28]  T. J. Spinks,et al.  A comparison of count rate performance for /sup 15/O-water blood flow studies in the CTI HR+ and Accel tomographs in 3D mode , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[29]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Performance measurements of the SP3000/UW time-of-flight positron emission tomograph , 1988 .

[30]  B. Leskovar,et al.  A Measuring System for Studying the Time-Resolution Capabilities of Fast Photomultipliers , 1973 .

[31]  J. M. Rochelle,et al.  A custom mixed signal CMOS integrated circuit for high performance PET tomograph front-end applications , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[32]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Design of a lanthanum bromide detector for time-of-flight PET , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[33]  L. G. Hyman,et al.  Time Resolution of Photomultiplier Systems , 1965 .

[34]  W. Moses,et al.  Prospects for time-of-flight PET using LSO scintillator , 1999 .

[35]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Labr3:Ce scintillators for gamma ray spectroscopy , 2002 .

[36]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Image quality assessment of LaBr/sub 3/ based 3D PET scanners , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[37]  J. M. Rochelle,et al.  A Monolithic, 2 /spl mu/m CMOS Constant-fraction Discriminator For Moderate Time Resolution Systems , 1991 .

[38]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  A method for determination of the timing stability of PET scanners , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Michel M. Ter-Pogossian,et al.  Super PETT I: A Positron Emission Tomograph Utilizing Photon Time-of-Flight Information , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  W. Moses,et al.  CeBr/sub 3/ scintillators for gamma-ray spectroscopy , 2005 .

[41]  W. Moses Time of flight in PET revisited , 2003 .

[42]  R. Nutt,et al.  Advances in the scintillation performance of LSO:Ce single crystals , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[43]  David M. Binkley,et al.  Performance of non-delay-line constant-fraction discriminator timing circuits , 1994 .

[44]  S. Surti,et al.  Investigation of image quality and NEC in a TOF-capable PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..