Integrating Environmental Assessment of Emerging Materials into the Material Selection Process

Existing material selection methodologies do not account for effects that scaling has on the resulting environmental consequences. The impact of producing an emerging material using a lab-scale process is likely to differ significantly from the impact of mass-producing the same material at industrial scale. We propose a methodology, based on the established Ashby material selection process, that combines material selection with environmental impact assessment and takes into account the effects of scaling up material production processes for emerging materials. The approach adds additional steps for data collection, life cycle assessment and scaling to the pre-existing steps in Ashby’s methodology. It allows for the assessment of multiple environmental impact categories as well as a transparent way of handling underlying data uncertainty and variability. We review existing approaches of environmental material selection methodologies, derive requirements for a novel approach, present our concept methodology and demonstrate it using a case study example. Further refinement of the concept should primarily address the life cycle assessment and scaling steps.

[1]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Chapter 7 – Material Selection , 2014 .

[2]  Margni Manuele,et al.  Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD handbook) , 2011 .

[3]  Jen-Taut Yeh,et al.  Water-vapor-permeable polyurethane resin , 2002 .

[4]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Epitaxial Graphene Production at Different Manufacturing Scales and Maturity , 2017 .

[5]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Material efficiency: A white paper , 2011 .

[6]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design , 2002 .

[7]  H. Kaebernick,et al.  Material Grouping for Simplified Product Life Cycle Assessment , 2003 .

[8]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Early-stage sustainability assessment to assist with material selection : a case study for biobased printer panels , 2016 .

[9]  S. Kappenthuler,et al.  From resources to research—a framework for identification and prioritization of materials research for sustainable construction , 2020 .

[10]  Christoph Herrmann,et al.  Integrated Computational Life Cycle Engineering — Application to the case of electric vehicles , 2018 .

[11]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Italian and Spanish bovine leather production systems , 2011 .

[12]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and the Environment: Eco-informed Material Choice , 2009 .

[13]  Shuyou Zhang,et al.  Material selection combined with optimal structural design for mechanical parts , 2013 .

[14]  Roudier Serge,et al.  Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Refining of Mineral Oil and Gas. Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) , 2013 .

[15]  Arlindo Silva,et al.  Life cycle engineering methodology applied to material selection, a fender case study , 2008 .

[16]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[18]  Sophie Hallstedt,et al.  Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development , 2017 .

[19]  S. Olsen,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Practice , 2018 .

[20]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies , 2016 .

[21]  Michael F. Ashby Eco-informed materials selection , 2013 .