Use of sensor-determined behaviours to develop algorithms for pasture intake by individual grazing cattle

Abstract. Practical and reliable measurement of pasture intake by individual animals will enable improved precision in livestock and pasture management, provide input data for prediction and simulation models, and allow animals to be ranked on grazing efficiency for genetic improvement. In this study, we assessed whether pasture intake of individual grazing cattle could be estimated from time spent exhibiting behaviours as determined from data generated by on-animal sensor devices. Variation in pasture intake was created by providing Angus steers (n = 10, mean ± s.d. liveweight 650 ± 77 kg) with differing amounts of concentrate supplementation during grazing within individual ryegrass plots (≤0.22 ha). Pasture dry matter intake (DMI) for the steers was estimated from the slope (kg DM day–1) of the regression of total pasture DM per plot on intake over an 11-day period. Pasture DM in each plot, commencing with ≤2 t DM ha–1, was determined by using repeatedly calibrated pasture height and electronic rising plate meters. The amounts of time spent grazing, ruminating, walking and resting were determined for the 10 steers by using data from collar-mounted, inertial measurement units and a previously developed, highly accurate, behaviour classification model. An initial pasture intake algorithm was established for time spent grazing: pasture DMI (kg day–1) = –4.13 + 2.325 × hours spent grazing (P = 0.010, r2 = 0.53, RSD = 1.65 kg DM day–1). Intake algorithms require further development, validation and refinement under varying pasture conditions by using sensor devices to determine specific pasture intake behaviours coupled with established methods for measuring pasture characteristics and grazing intake and selectivity.

[1]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Bite dimensions and grazing movements by sheep and cattle grazing homogeneous perennial ryegrass swards , 2004 .

[2]  Leslie Overs,et al.  New ways of measuring intake, efficiency and behaviour of grazing livestock , 2014 .

[3]  Luciano A. González,et al.  Development and application of a livestock phenomics platform to enhance productivity and efficiency at pasture , 2016 .

[4]  Yukinori Tani,et al.  Automatic recognition and classification of cattle chewing activity by an acoustic monitoring method with a single-axis acceleration sensor , 2013 .

[5]  Malcolm J. Hawkesford,et al.  Plant phenotyping: increasing throughput and precision at multiple scales. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[6]  Greg Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Behavioral classification of data from collars containing motion sensors in grazing cattle , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[7]  A. Smart,et al.  Prediction of leaf:stem ratio in grasses using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy , 1998 .

[8]  G. Hinch,et al.  Grazing behaviour and pattern of intake of dairy cows grazing kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) grass pastures in relation to sward height and length of grazing session , 2009 .

[9]  Daniel V. Smith,et al.  A comparison of autoencoder and statistical features for cattle behaviour classification , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[10]  P. D. Penning Herbage intake handbook. , 2004 .

[11]  Md. Sumon Shahriar,et al.  Behavior classification of cows fitted with motion collars: Decomposing multi-class classification into a set of binary problems , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[12]  Paul L. Greenwood,et al.  Consequences of nutrition during gestation, and the challenge to better understand and enhance livestock productivity and efficiency in pastoral ecosystems , 2014 .

[13]  Greg P. Timms,et al.  Bag of Class Posteriors, a new multivariate time series classifier applied to animal behaviour identification , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Paul L. Greenwood,et al.  Precision of estimating individual feed intake of grazing animals offered low, declining pasture availability1 , 2014 .

[15]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Transforming Agriculture through Pervasive Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[16]  U. Braun,et al.  Eating and rumination activity in 10 cows over 10 days. , 2015, Research in veterinary science.

[17]  Diego H. Milone,et al.  Acoustic monitoring of short-term ingestive behavior and intake in grazing sheep , 2011 .

[18]  D. P. Poppi,et al.  Defoliation patterns and their implications for the management of vegetative tropical pastures to control intake and diet quality by cattle , 2016 .

[19]  Amots Hetzroni,et al.  Automatic recognition of jaw movements in free-ranging cattle, goats and sheep, using acoustic monitoring ☆ , 2013 .

[20]  E. Kolver,et al.  Genetic strain and diet effects on grazing behavior, pasture intake, and milk production. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Greg Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Dynamic cattle behavioural classification using supervised ensemble classifiers , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[22]  R. Sandland,et al.  Estimation of herbage consumption by grazing cattle using measurements of eating behaviour , 1976 .

[23]  S. M. Rutter,et al.  An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants , 1997 .

[24]  M. Meuret,et al.  Continuous bite monitoring: a method to assess the foraging dynamics of herbivores in natural grazing conditions , 2015 .

[25]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Estimation of grass intake on pasture for dairy cows using tightly and loosely mounted di- and tri-axial accelerometers combined with bite count , 2013 .

[26]  U. Braun,et al.  Evaluation of eating and rumination behaviour in 300 cows of three different breeds using a noseband pressure sensor , 2015, BMC Veterinary Research.

[27]  K. Umemura,et al.  Technical note: Estimation of feed intake while grazing using a wireless system requiring no halter. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  Greg P. Timms,et al.  An investigation of cow feeding behavior using motion sensors , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings.