Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process

A decade of public policy in special education has failed to yield suitable definitions, identification and assessment procedures, or reliable prevalence estimates of mild handicapping conditions, such as learning disabilities, mild mental retardation, and mild emotional disturbance. In the absence of professional agreement and compelling empirical evidence, federal and state policies represent a “consensual theory”; of special education for the mildly handicapped, based primarily on several psychometric‐oriented assumptions. Recent research has failed to support these assumptions and has provided evidence which is interpreted to show the overarching importance of teachers’ decision‐making — specifically decisions to refer a child for special education. This article argues the need for a rethinking of basic assumptions in special education for the mildly handicapped. Specifically, we recommend the design of: (a) new identification procedures at the school site level and (b) a program of research aimed at ...

[1]  R. Baron,et al.  The importance of race and social class information in the formation of expectancies about academic performance. , 1975 .

[2]  B. Algozzine,et al.  Modification of Biases Held by Teacher Trainees Toward the Disturbingness of Child Behaviors. , 1976 .

[3]  C. A. Norman,et al.  Characteristics of Children Labeled and Served as Learning Disabled in School Systems Affiliated With Child Service Demonstration Centers , 1980, Journal of learning disabilities.

[4]  J. Brophy,et al.  The Influence of Problem Ownership on Teachers' Perceptions of and Strategies for Coping with Problem Students. Research Series No. 84. , 1980 .

[5]  Sally Tomlinson,et al.  A sociology of special education , 1982 .

[6]  J. Ysseldyke,et al.  Learning Disabilities , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  J. Dusek,et al.  Do Teachers Bias Children’s Learning? , 1975 .

[8]  Barbara Kornblau.  The Teachable Pupil Survey: A Technique for Assessing Teachers' Perceptions of Pupil Attributes. , 1982 .

[9]  M. Gerber.  Economic considerations of “appropriate” education for exceptional children , 1981 .

[10]  M. Semmel,et al.  THE MICROECONOMICS OF REFERRAL AND REINTEGRATION: A PARADIGM FOR EVALUATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION , 1985 .

[11]  James E. Ysseldyke,et al.  Assessment in special and remedial education , 1978 .

[12]  S. Christenson,et al.  An Analysis of Teachers' Reasons and Desired Outcomes for Students Referred for Psychoeducational Assessment , 1983 .

[13]  S. Christenson,et al.  Institutional Constraints and External Pressures Influencing Referral Decisions. , 1982 .

[14]  Matt McGue,et al.  “I Know One When I See One” — Differentiating LD and Non-LD Students , 1984 .

[15]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Teacher-student relationships: causes and consequences , 1974 .

[16]  S. Christenson,et al.  Probabilities Associated with the Referral to Placement Process , 1982 .

[17]  B. Algozzine,et al.  The emotionally disturbed child: Disturbed or disturbing , 1977, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[18]  C. E. Meyers,et al.  System-identification of mildly mentally retarded children: implications for interpreting and conducting research. , 1980, American journal of mental deficiency.

[19]  J. Mcleod.  Educational Underachievement , 1979, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  Bob Algozzine,et al.  Decision Makers’ Prediction of Students’ Academic Difficulties as a Function of Referral Information , 1980 .

[21]  A Sociological Perspective on Diagnosing Learning Difficulties , 1982, Journal of learning disabilities.

[22]  M. Semmel,et al.  Policy research and special education: research issues affecting policy formation and implementation , 1981 .

[23]  Michael Pullis,et al.  The Influence of Children’s Temperament Characteristics on Teachers’ Decision Strategies , 1982 .

[24]  B. Keogh,et al.  Children's temperament and teachers' decisions. , 1982, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[25]  G. Coles.  The Learning-Disabilities Test Battery: Empirical and Social Issues , 1978 .

[26]  Carl Braun,et al.  Teacher Expectation: Sociopsychological Dynamics , 1976 .

[27]  A Simultaneous Equation Model of the Provision of Services to Handicapped Children at the School District Level , 1982 .

[28]  P. Meehl,et al.  Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  T. Stephens,et al.  Child Identification or Child Inventory? A Critique of the Federal Design of Child-Identification Systems Implemented Under P.L. 94-142 , 1980 .

[30]  C. S. Englert,et al.  A Decision-Making Orientation , 1978 .

[31]  H. Borko,et al.  Individual Differences in Teachers' Decision Strategies: An Investigation of Classroom Organization and Management Decisions. , 1982 .

[32]  J. Brophy,et al.  Stability of Teacher Effectiveness1 , 1973 .

[33]  J. Ysseldyke,et al.  LD or Not LD , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[34]  J. Ysseldyke,et al.  A Logical and Empirical Analysis of Current Practice in Classifying Students as Handicapped , 1983, Exceptional children.

[35]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Research on Teachers’ Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior , 1981 .

[36]  S. Sarason.  Educational handicap, public policy, and social history : a broadened perspective on mental retardation / Seymour B. Sarason and John Doris , 1979 .

[37]  J. Chalfant,et al.  Teacher Assistance Teams: A Model for Within-Building Problem Solving , 1979 .

[38]  N. Burbules,et al.  Equity, Equal Opportunity, and Education , 1982 .

[39]  John Elkins,et al.  Characteristics of Children Enrolled in the Child Service Demonstration Centers , 1974 .

[40]  B. Algozzine,et al.  Teachers' Predictions of Children's School Success as a Function of Their Behavioral Tolerances. , 1979 .