Nanocellulose patents trends: a comprehensive review on patents on cellulose nanocrystals, microfibrillated and bacterial cellulose.

Cellulose nanoparticles (i.e. cellulose elements having at least one dimension in the 1-100 nm range) have received increasing attention during the last decade. This is not only evident in academic articles, but it is also manifested by the increasing number of nanocellulose patents that are published every year. In the current review, nanocellulose patents are reviewed using specific software which provides valuable information on the annual number of patents that have been published throughout the years, main patent owners, most prolific inventors, and patents on the field that have received more citations. Patent statistics on rod-like cellulose nanoparticles extracted from plants by acid hydrolysis (nanocrystals), mechanical treatment leading to microfibrillated cellulose (MFC), and microbially produced nanofibrils (bacterial cellulose, BC) are analyzed in detail. The aim of the current review is to provide researchers with patent information which may help them in visualizing the evolution of nanocellulose technology, both as a whole and also divided among the different nanosized particles that are currently the subject of outstanding scientific attention. Then, patents are not only analyzed by their content, but also by global statistics which will reveal the moment at which different cellulose nanoparticles technologies achieved a breakthrough, the relative interest received by different nanocellulose particles throughout the years, the companies that have been most interested in this technology, the most prolific inventors, and the patents that have had more influence in further developments. It is expected that the results showing the explosion that nanocellulose technology is experiencing in current days will still bring more research on the topic and contribute to the expansion of nanocellulosics applications.

[1]  Masatoshi Iguchi,et al.  Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature's arts , 2000 .

[2]  Julien Bras,et al.  Cellulosic Bionanocomposites: A Review of Preparation, Properties and Applications , 2010 .

[3]  H. J. Woods,et al.  X-ray and electron microscope studies of the degradation of cellulose by sulphuric acid. , 1953, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Y. Yamada,et al.  The phylogeny of acetic acid bacteria based on the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA: the elevation of the subgenus Gluconoacetobacter to the generic level. , 1997, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[5]  J. Keckes,et al.  Tensile properties of cellulose acetate butyrate composites reinforced with bacterial cellulose , 2004 .

[6]  Sun-Young Lee,et al.  Nanocellulose reinforced PVA composite films: Effects of acid treatment and filler loading , 2009 .

[7]  L. Drzal,et al.  PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE POLYVINYL ALCOHOL COMPOSITE MATERIALS , 2008 .

[8]  B. Rånby,et al.  Aqueous Colloidal Solutions of Cellulose Micelles. , 1949 .

[9]  S. Atre,et al.  Nano-enabled microtechnology: polysulfone nanocomposites incorporating cellulose nanocrystals , 2007 .

[10]  M. Vignon,et al.  Topochemistry of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals resulting from TEMPO-mediated oxidation , 2005 .

[11]  Y. Nishi,et al.  The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose , 1990 .

[12]  O. Ikkala,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[13]  Robin Zuluaga,et al.  Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes , 2011 .

[14]  D G Gray,et al.  Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. , 1992, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[15]  J. Gong,et al.  Tubular bacterial cellulose gel with oriented fibrils on the curved surface , 2008 .

[16]  M. Roman,et al.  Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  J. Luong,et al.  Cellulose nanocrystal/gold nanoparticle composite as a matrix for enzyme immobilization. , 2009, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[18]  A. Brown.  XLIII.—On an acetic ferment which forms cellulose , 1886 .

[19]  Dieter Klemm,et al.  Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility , 1983 .

[21]  L. Berglund,et al.  Structure and Properties of Cellulose Nanocomposite Films Containing Melamine Formaldehyde , 2007 .

[22]  A. Yousefi,et al.  Biotechnological production of cellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus from agricultural waste , 2011 .

[23]  H. Yano,et al.  Thermo-mechanical properties of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced partially crystallized PLA composites , 2010 .

[24]  B. Rånby.  Fibrous macromolecular systems. Cellulose and muscle. The colloidal properties of cellulose micelles , 1951 .

[25]  Véronique Favier,et al.  Nanocomposite materials from latex and cellulose whiskers , 1995 .

[26]  David Plackett,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review , 2010 .

[27]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[28]  J. Colvin.  Formation of cellulose microfibrils in a homogenate of Acetobacter xylinum. , 1957, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[29]  M. Schramm,et al.  Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. , 1954, The Biochemical journal.

[30]  Ashlie Martini,et al.  Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[31]  M. Ioelovich.  Cellulose as a nanostructured polymer: A short review , 2008, BioResources.

[32]  N. Durán,et al.  Review of cellulose nanocrystals patents: preparation, composites and general applications. , 2012, Recent patents on nanotechnology.

[33]  Lucian A. Lucia,et al.  CELLULOSIC NANOCOMPOSITES: A REVIEW , 2008 .

[34]  Véronique Favier,et al.  Polymer Nanocomposites Reinforced by Cellulose Whiskers , 1995 .

[35]  N. Rastogi,et al.  Statistical optimization of medium composition for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 using coffee cherry husk extract--an agro-industry waste. , 2011, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[36]  L. Lucia,et al.  Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[37]  R. Singhal,et al.  Microbial Cellulose: Fermentative Production and Applications , 2009 .

[38]  V. Álvarez,et al.  Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers , 2008 .

[39]  Gunnar Henriksson,et al.  An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers , 2007 .

[40]  Ichiro Sakurada,et al.  Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers , 1962 .

[41]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites , 2010, Journal of Materials Science.

[42]  S. Valla,et al.  Cellulose-negative Mutants of Acetobacter xylinum , 1982 .

[43]  J. Mager,et al.  Synthesis of Cellulose by Resting Cells of Acetobacter xylinum , 1947, Nature.

[44]  F. Morehead,et al.  Liquid Crystal Systems from Fibrillar Polysaccharides , 1959, Nature.

[45]  K. R. Sandberg,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential , 1983 .

[46]  Xuefei Zhang,et al.  A novel amphotropic polymer based on cellulose nanocrystals grafted with azo polymers , 2008 .

[47]  J. Araki,et al.  Toward "strong" green nanocomposites: polyvinyl alcohol reinforced with extremely oriented cellulose whiskers. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[48]  B. Rånby,et al.  Über den Feinbau der Zellulose , 1950, Experientia.

[49]  Akira Isogai,et al.  Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[50]  Y. Yamada.  Transfer of Acetobacter oboediens Sokollek et al 1998 and Acetobacter intermedius Boesch et al. 1998 to the genus Gluconacetobacter as Gluconacetobacter oboediens comb. nov. and Gluconacetobacter intermedius comb. nov. , 2000, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[51]  Stephen J. Eichhorn,et al.  An estimation of the Young’s modulus of bacterial cellulose filaments , 2008 .

[52]  H. J. Woods,et al.  Electron-microscopy of Degraded Cellulose Fibres , 1952 .

[53]  Marielle Henriksson,et al.  Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[54]  O. Battista.  Hydrolysis and Crystallization of Cellulose , 1950 .

[55]  A. Basta,et al.  Research Progress in Friendly Environmental Technology for the Production of Cellulose Products (Bacterial Cellulose and Its Application) , 2004 .

[56]  Redouane Borsali,et al.  Rodlike Cellulose Microcrystals: Structure, Properties, and Applications , 2004 .

[57]  Shuping Dong,et al.  Fluorescently labeled cellulose nanocrystals for bioimaging applications. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  M. Fujiwara,et al.  Synthesis of bacterial cellulose composite by Acetobacter xylinum, 1: Its mechanical strength and biodegradability , 1995 .

[59]  Alain Dufresne,et al.  Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[60]  J. Cavaillé,et al.  New nanocomposite materials reinforced with cellulose whiskers in atactic polypropylene: effect of surface and dispersion characteristics. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.