Performance of polyethylene and polypropylene beads towards drill cuttings transportation in horizontal wellbore

Abstract Drilled cuttings removal is critical in drilling operations, especially in horizontal wells. These cuttings are postulated to be among the possible causes of many costly complications, such as mechanical pipe sticking, bore hole instability, drag and torque. This study proposes a new approach that uses polymer beads as a mud additive to improve cutting transportation. In this study, the effect of the concentration of polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) polymer beads on cuttings transport efficiency (CTE) in water-based mud in a horizontal wellbore was investigated. Experiments were conducted in a lab-scale flow loop equipped with a 13-ft (3.96 m) test section consisting of a concentric annulus acrylic outer casing (2 in. ID) and a static inner PVC drill string (0.79 in. OD). A total of 150 tests were conducted using 10 ppg water based mud (WBM) with 1%–5% by vol. Concentrations of polymer beads (PE and PP) were added at a range of 8–9.5 cp. Six different sizes of drilled cuttings ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mm were used as samples to determine the CTE at a constant 0.69 m/s average annular fluid velocity. The results revealed that CTE increased with the increase of polymer bead concentrations and that PP is better compared to PE overall due to its low density. The highest CTE was recorded at a 5% concentration of water-based mud polypropylene (WBMPP), which is approximately 96% for cutting sizes of 0.50mm–0.99 mm.

[1]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Correlations of mud rheological properties with cuttings-transport performance in directional drilling , 1991 .

[2]  C. E. Williams,et al.  Carrying Capacity of Drilling Muds , 1951 .

[3]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Important Issues in Cuttings Transport for Drilling Directional Wells , 1997 .

[4]  Stefan Z. Miska,et al.  Analysis of the Effects of Major Drilling Parameters on Cuttings Transport Efficiency for High-Angle Wells in Coiled Tubing Drilling Operations , 2004 .

[5]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Experimental Study of Drilled Cuttings Transport Using Common Drilling Muds , 1983 .

[6]  C. J. Hopkins,et al.  Reducing the Risk of Stuck Pipe in The Netherlands , 1995 .

[7]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Development of a New Cuttings-Transport Model for High-Angle Wellbores Including Horizontal Wells , 1997 .

[8]  Wang Kelin,et al.  Review and Analysis of Cuttings Transport in Complex Structural Wells , 2013 .

[9]  Ramsey,et al.  Amoco`s training initiative reduces wellsite drilling problems , 1995 .

[10]  R. Clark,et al.  A Mechanistic Model for Cuttings Transport , 1994 .

[11]  Ahmad Shamsul Izwan Ismail,et al.  Impact of drilling fluid viscosity, velocity and hole inclination on cuttings transport in horizontal and highly deviated wells , 2012, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[12]  Ahmad Shamsul Izwan Ismail,et al.  Improving the cuttings transport performance of water-based mud through the use of polypropylene beads , 2015 .

[13]  M. B. Oyeneyin,et al.  Comprehensive Experimental Investigation of Drilled Cuttings Transport in Inclined Wells Including the Effects of Rotation and Eccentricity , 1990 .

[14]  A. A. Gavignet,et al.  Model Aids Cuttings Transport Prediction , 1989 .

[15]  Arild Saasen,et al.  The Effect of Drilling Fluid Rheological Properties on Hole Cleaning , 2002 .