Human influence on California fire regimes.

Periodic wildfire maintains the integrity and species composition of many ecosystems, including the mediterranean-climate shrublands of California. However, human activities alter natural fire regimes, which can lead to cascading ecological effects. Increased human ignitions at the wildland-urban interface (WUI) have recently gained attention, but fire activity and risk are typically estimated using only biophysical variables. Our goal was to determine how humans influence fire in California and to examine whether this influence was linear, by relating contemporary (2000) and historic (1960-2000) fire data to both human and biophysical variables. Data for the human variables included fine-resolution maps of the WUI produced using housing density and land cover data. Interface WUI, where development abuts wildland vegetation, was differentiated from intermix WUI, where development intermingles with wildland vegetation. Additional explanatory variables included distance to WUI, population density, road density, vegetation type, and ecoregion. All data were summarized at the county level and analyzed using bivariate and multiple regression methods. We found highly significant relationships between humans and fire on the contemporary landscape, and our models explained fire frequency (R2 = 0.72) better than area burned (R2 = 0.50). Population density, intermix WUI, and distance to WUI explained the most variability in fire frequency, suggesting that the spatial pattern of development may be an important variable to consider when estimating fire risk. We found nonlinear effects such that fire frequency and area burned were highest at intermediate levels of human activity, but declined beyond certain thresholds. Human activities also explained change in fire frequency and area burned (1960-2000), but our models had greater explanatory power during the years 1960-1980, when there was more dramatic change in fire frequency. Understanding wildfire as a function of the spatial arrangement of ignitions and fuels on the landscape, in addition to nonlinear relationships, will be important to fire managers and conservation planners because fire risk may be related to specific levels of housing density that can be accounted for in land use planning. With more fires occurring in close proximity to human infrastructure, there may also be devastating ecological impacts if development continues to grow farther into wildland vegetation.

[1]  Bushfire risk at the urban interface estimated from historical weather records: consequences for the use of prescribed fire in the Sydney region of south-eastern Australia , 1998 .

[2]  Bruce Shindler,et al.  Fuel Reduction Strategies in Forest Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Public Support , 2003 .

[3]  S. Ventura,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS INFLUENCING WILDFIRES IN THE UPPER MIDWEST, UNITED STATES , 2001 .

[4]  James C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[5]  Jeremy S. Fried,et al.  Wildland-urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington , 2007 .

[6]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Assessing Fire Risk in the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2004, Journal of Forestry.

[7]  How We Will Grow: Baseline Projections of California’s Urban Footprint Through the Year 2100 , 2003 .

[8]  M. J. Schroeder,et al.  SYNOPTIC WEATHER TYPES ASSOCIATED WITH CRITICAL FIRE WEATHER , 1964 .

[9]  Patrick A. Zollner,et al.  Human influence on the abundance and connectivity of high-risk fuels in mixed forests of northern Wisconsin, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Forest fire causes and extent on United States Forest Service lands , 2005 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[12]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  Impact of Past, Present, and Future Fire Regimes on North American Mediterranean Shrublands , 2003 .

[13]  W. Bond,et al.  Fire as a global 'herbivore': the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  John D. Landis,et al.  How We Will Grow: Baseline Projections of the Growth of California's Urban Footprint through the Year 2100 , 2003 .

[15]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[16]  J. Michaelsen,et al.  Variations in a regional fire regime related to vegetation type in San Diego County, California (USA) , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Keeley,et al.  Reexamining fire suppression impacts on brushland fire regimes , 1999, Science.

[18]  Jack D. Cohen Preventing Disaster: Home Ignitability in the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2000, Journal of Forests.

[19]  W. D. Billings,et al.  North American Terrestrial Vegetation , 1988 .

[20]  X. Lee,et al.  Introduction to wildland fire , 1997 .

[21]  C. Allen,et al.  ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE ECOSYSTEMS: A BROAD PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[22]  Christine A. Vogt,et al.  Fuel treatments at the wildland-urban interface: Common concerns in diverse regions , 2002 .

[23]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: a Synthesis of Fire Policy and Science , 2004 .

[24]  S. Conard,et al.  Fire effects on California chaparral systems: an overview , 1991 .

[25]  J. Keeley Distribution of lightning and man-caused wildfires in California , 1982 .

[26]  J. Fried,et al.  Homeowner Perspectives on Fire Hazard, Responsibility, and Management Strategies at the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2000 .

[27]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Characterizing dynamic spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940-1990 across the North Central United States , 2004 .

[28]  B. W. Wilgen,et al.  Fire and Plants , 1995, Population and Community Biology Series.

[29]  Max A. Moritz,et al.  ANALYZING EXTREME DISTURBANCE EVENTS: FIRE IN LOS PADRES NATIONAL FOREST , 1997 .

[30]  Michael Taylor Diversity of life , 1994, Nature.

[31]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL TRAITS IN RELATION TO FIRE IN CROWN-FIRE ECOSYSTEMS , 2004 .

[32]  J. Keeley,et al.  Role of high fire frequency in destruction of mixed chaparral. , 1993 .

[33]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  Testing a basic assumption of shrubland fire management: how important is fuel age? , 2004 .

[34]  R. Neilson,et al.  The interplay between climate change, forests, and disturbances. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  A. Dobson,et al.  Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States , 1997, Science.

[36]  Gregory S. McMaster,et al.  Vegetation Change in Response to Extreme Events: The Effect of a Short Interval between Fires in California Chaparral and Coastal Scrub , 1983 .

[37]  Robert G. Bailey,et al.  The following is an electronic version of National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units , 1999 .

[38]  V. Radeloff,et al.  Roads and Landscape Pattern in Northern Wisconsin Based on a Comparison of Four Road Data Sources , 2004 .

[39]  Jeffrey P. Prestemon,et al.  Comparing production function models for wildfire risk analysis in the wildland–urban interface , 2005 .

[40]  M Askenazi,et al.  Community dynamics: what happens when we rerun the tape? , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behaviour in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 1998 .

[42]  W. Hargrove,et al.  EFFECTS OF FIRE SIZE AND PATTERN ON EARLY SUCCESSION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 1997 .

[43]  Jon E. Keeley,et al.  Fire history of the San Francisco East Bay region and implications for landscape patterns , 2005 .

[44]  Brean W. Duncan,et al.  Anthropogenic influences on potential fire spread in a pyrogenic ecosystem of Florida, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[46]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[47]  Harold S. J. Zald,et al.  Stand Conditions Associated with Tree Regeneration in Sierran Mixed- Conifer Forests , 2005 .

[48]  T. Kitzberger,et al.  Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range. , 2000 .

[49]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY CONCEPTS IN MANAGING ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[50]  J. Keith Gilless,et al.  Assessing the Benefits of Reducing Fire Risk in the Wildland- Urban Interface: A Contingent Valuation Approach , 1999 .

[51]  B. Malamud,et al.  Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Landscape-scale controls over 20th century fire occurrence in two large Rocky Mountain (USA) wilderness areas , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[53]  David T. Butry,et al.  Understanding Broadscale Wildfire Risks in a Human-Dominated Landscape , 2002 .

[54]  P. Zedler Fire, chaparral, and survival in southern California , 2005 .

[55]  D. Calkin,et al.  Forest service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970-2002 , 2005 .

[56]  R. Neilson,et al.  Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California , 2003 .

[57]  M. Moritz,et al.  Lessons from the 2003 wildfires in southern California , 2004 .