Experimental research of the synthetic jet generator designs based on actuation of diaphragm with piezoelectric actuator

Abstract Experimental analyses of four own developed synthetic jet generator designs were presented in this paper. The main task of this work was to find the most appropriate design of the synthetic jet generator. Dynamic characteristics of the synthetic jet generator׳s diaphragm with piezoelectric material were measured using non-contact measuring equipment laser vibrometer Polytec ® PSV 400. Temperatures of the piezoelectric diaphragms working in resonance frequency were measured with Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor. Experimental analysis of the synthetic jet generator amplitude–frequency characteristics were performed using CTA (hot wire anemometer) measuring techniques. Piezoelectric diaphragm in diameter of 27 mm was excited by sinusoidal voltage signal and it was fixed tightly inside the chamber of the synthetic jet generator. The number of the synthetic jet generator orifices (1 or 3) and volume of cavity (height of cavity vary from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm) were changed. The highest value of the synthetic jet velocity 25 m/s was obtained with synthetic jet generator which has cavity 0.5 mm and 1 orifice (resonance frequency of the piezoelectric diaphragm 2.8 kHz). It can be concluded that this type of the design is preferred in order to get the peak velocity of the synthetic jet.

[1]  Arkadiusz Mystkowski,et al.  Piezo-stack vortex generators for boundary layer control of a delta wing micro-aerial vehicle , 2013 .

[2]  M. S. Genç,et al.  Performance of transition model for predicting low Re aerofoil flows without/with single and simultaneous blowing and suction , 2011 .

[3]  Damiano Casalino,et al.  Aircraft noise reduction technologies: A bibliographic review , 2008 .

[4]  Thomas Mautner,et al.  Application of the synthetic jet concept to low Reynolds number biosensor microfluidic flows for enhanced mixing: a numerical study using the lattice Boltzmann method. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  Z. Trávníček,et al.  Comparison of double-acting and single-acting synthetic jets , 2013 .

[6]  Keith B. Paschal,et al.  A Separation Control CFD Validation Test Case Part 2. Zero Efflux Oscillatory Blowing , 2005 .

[7]  Ronald D. Joslin,et al.  Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation, and experiment , 2004 .

[8]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Analysis of flow distribution from high-speed flow actuator using particle image velocimetry and digital speckle tomography , 2010 .

[9]  Sang-Hoon Kim,et al.  Separation control on NACA23012 using synthetic jet , 2006 .

[10]  P. Panigrahi,et al.  Influence of amplitude and frequency modulation on flow created by a synthetic jet actuator , 2010 .

[11]  P. Sagaut,et al.  Numerical simulation of active separation control by a synthetic jet , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Noor A. Ahmed,et al.  Enhancing vertical axis wind turbine by dynamic stall control using synthetic jets , 2013 .

[13]  Jose Mathew,et al.  Lumped element modeling of piezoelectric-driven synthetic jet actuators , 2002 .

[14]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Optimization of Synthetic Jet Actuators , 2003 .

[15]  G. D. Davis,et al.  A Criterion for the Formation of Micro Synthetic Jets , 2004 .

[16]  G.A.M. van Kuik,et al.  Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines , 2010 .

[17]  A. Agrawal,et al.  A numerical investigation of effects of cavity and orifice parameters on the characteristics of a synthetic jet flow , 2011 .

[18]  R. Holman,et al.  Formation Criterion for Synthetic Jets , 2005 .