Life Cycle Assessment of Frozen Tilapia Fillets From Indonesian Lake‐Based and Pond‐Based Intensive Aquaculture Systems

We used life cycle assessment to evaluate a subset of the cradle-to-destination-port environmental impacts associated with the production, processing, and transportation of frozen, packaged Indonesian tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets to ports in Chicago and Rotterdam. Specifically, we evaluated the cumulative energy use; biotic resource use; and global warming, acidifying, and eutrophying emissions at each life cycle stage and in aggregate. We identify the importance of least environmental cost feed sourcing for reducing supply chain environmental impacts. We also highlight the need for more effective nutrient cycling in intensive aquaculture. The environmental trade-offs inherent in substituting technological inputs for ecosystem services in intensive pond-based versus lake-based production systems are discussed. We further call for more nuanced considerations of comparative environmental advantage in the production and interregional trade of food commodities than has been characteristic of historic food miles discussions. Significant opportunities exist for improving environmental performance in tilapia aquaculture. This product compares favorably, however, with several other fishery, aquaculture, and animal husbandry products, according to the suite of impact categories considered in this study.

[1]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[2]  A. Ponter,et al.  Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. , 2004 .

[3]  Roland Clift,et al.  Potentials and Limitations of Life Cycle Assessment in Setting Ecolabelling Criteria: A Case Study of Thai Shrimp Aquaculture Product (5 pp) , 2006 .

[4]  Nathan W. Ayer,et al.  Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada , 2009 .

[5]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[6]  Takeo Shiina,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. , 2009 .

[7]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Not all salmon are created equal: life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  C. Boyd,et al.  Dry Matter, Ash, and Elemental Composition of Pond‐Cultured Tilapia Oreochromis aureus and O. niloticus , 1998 .

[9]  U. Sonesson,et al.  Sustainable Development of Food Production: A Case Study on Scenarios for Pig Production , 2005 .

[10]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[11]  重信 池戸,et al.  ISO (International Organization for Standardization ; 国際標準化機構) , 1997 .

[12]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the Upper Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[13]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus , 2007 .

[14]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25 , 2006 .

[15]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  Salmon and sustainability : the biophysical cost of producing salmon through the commercial salmon fishery and the intensive salmon culture industry , 2000 .

[16]  Carl Folke,et al.  Analysis Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe , 1996 .

[17]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better? , 2007 .

[18]  M. Hasan,et al.  Use of fishery resources as feed inputs for aquaculture development: trends and policy implications , 2006 .

[19]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Environmental analysis of the Norwegian fishery and aquaculture industry—A preliminary study focusing on farmed salmon , 2009 .

[20]  J. Galloway,et al.  Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions , 2008, Science.

[21]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: Review of problems and strategies , 2007 .

[22]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Scenario Modeling Potential Eco-Efficiency Gains from a Transition to Organic Agriculture: Life Cycle Perspectives on Canadian Canola, Corn, Soy, and Wheat Production , 2008, Environmental management.

[23]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  L. Reijnders,et al.  Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices. , 2003, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[25]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Life Cycle Considerations for Improving Sustainability Assessments in Seafood Awareness Campaigns , 2008, Environmental management.

[26]  A. H. Zakri,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report , 2005 .

[27]  J. Aubin,et al.  Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment. , 2009 .

[28]  N. Pelletier,et al.  Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions , 2008 .

[29]  A. Hospido,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries , 2005 .