Social choice functions: A tool for ranking variables involved in action plans against road noise.

Traffic noise is gaining importance in planning and operation of roads in developing countries, and particularly in Europe and Latin America. Many variables with different degrees of importance influence the perception of noise from roads. Thus, the problem of prioritizing road stretches for action against such noise is an important issue in environmental noise management. For example, it can be addressed using multicriteria methods. However, these methodologies require criteria or suitable variables to be ranked according to their relative importance. In the present study, for this ranking, a list of nine variables involved in the decision-making process (called "road stretch priority variables") was presented in the form of questionnaires to high-level experts from Andalusia, southern Spain. These experts ranked the variables by relevance. Using the same data, seven social choice functions (Plurality, Raynaud, Kemeny-Young, Copeland, Simpson, Schulze, and Borda) were used in order to rank the variables. The results indicate that the most important variables were those that take into account the parameters of greatest exposure for the citizens, followed by variables related to the intensity of the problem analyzed. The results show that a combination of the use of social choice functions on aggregated information from expert panels can provide a consensus for ranking priority variables related to road stretches.

[1]  M. Martín-Morales,et al.  Comparative study by an expert panel of documents recognized for energy efficiency certification of buildings in Spain , 2015 .

[2]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  USER PERCEPTIONS AND ENGINEERING DEFINITIONS OF HIGHWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE: AN EXPLORATORY STATISTICAL COMPARISON , 2004 .

[3]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[4]  Patricia Rose Gomes de Melo Viol Martins,et al.  MATHEMATICS WITHOUT NUMBERS: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF LOGIC , 2015 .

[5]  Carlos Angel Iglesias,et al.  Evaluating social choice techniques into intelligent environments by agent based social simulation , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Massimiliano Masullo,et al.  Immersive virtual reality and environmental noise assessment: An innovative audio-visual approach , 2013 .

[7]  Samantha Windflower Assessment and management of environmental noise , 2014 .

[8]  Austen Rainer,et al.  Using an expert panel to validate a requirements process improvement model , 2005, J. Syst. Softw..

[9]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Transport discussion amidst climate challenges: Analysing student, media, and expert framings through the environmental protection process model , 2013 .

[10]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Framework of Success Criteria for Design/Build Projects , 2002 .

[11]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Assessment of non-point source pollution using a spatial multicriteria analysis approach , 2011 .

[12]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Integrating Social Equity into Urban Transportation Planning: A Critical Evaluation of Equity Objectives and Measures in Transportation Plans in North America , 2015 .

[14]  Salvatore Cafiso,et al.  Multicriteria Analysis Method for Pavement Maintenance Management , 2002 .

[15]  Sinasi Kaya,et al.  Exploring impacts of road transportation on environment : a spatial approach , 2008 .

[16]  Djamel Ouis,et al.  ANNOYANCE FROM ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE: A REVIEW , 2001 .

[17]  E Murphy,et al.  Implementation of the EU environmental noise directive: lessons from the first phase of strategic noise mapping and action planning in Ireland. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Antonio J. Torija,et al.  A methodology for classification by priority for action: Selecting road stretches for network noise action plans , 2014 .

[19]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  A social choice approach to expert consensus panels. , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[20]  José Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud,et al.  A unifying model to measure consensus solutions in a society , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[21]  A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson,et al.  Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness , 2006 .

[22]  Sathyanarayanan Rajendran,et al.  Design’s role in construction accident causality and prevention: Perspectives from an expert panel , 2008 .

[23]  Daniel A. Naish A method of developing regional road traffic noise management strategies , 2010 .

[24]  Gaetano Licitra,et al.  A novel method to determine multiexposure priority indices tested for Pisa action plan , 2011 .

[25]  Craig Stephen,et al.  Using expert informed GIS to locate important marine social-ecological hotspots. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The design of a policy Delphi , 1970 .

[27]  Klaus Tochtermann Greening the super highway: practical steps to sustainability in the information society , 2001 .

[28]  Arnaud Can,et al.  Assessment of the impact of speed limit reduction and traffic signal coordination on vehicle emissions using an integrated approach , 2011 .

[29]  Takashi Yano,et al.  Road Traffic Noise Annoyance in Relation to Average Noise Level, Number of Events and Maximum Noise Level , 1999 .

[30]  A. Levenglick,et al.  Fair and reasonable election systems , 1975 .

[31]  Ferenc Szidarovszky,et al.  Social choice procedures in water-resource management , 1998 .

[32]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin,et al.  Effects of traffic composition on road noise: a case study , 2004 .

[34]  Wei Tong Chen,et al.  Time Is Money: Innovative Contracting Methods in Highway Construction , 1995 .