Examining Dilemmas of Practice Associated With the Integration of Technology Into Mathematics Classrooms Serving Urban Students

This article contributes to research on contextual influences on technology integration in urban mathematics classrooms through an investigation of five middle-grade teachers’ participation in a laptop program. Drawing on activity theory, findings illuminate teachers’ dilemmas and coping strategies in their efforts to integrate technology. Dilemmas of practice included (a) determining the role of technology, (b) meeting misaligned expectations, and (c) gaining knowledge and skills despite limited professional development. Coping strategies included (a) integrating multiple institutional goals, (b) breaking rules, and (c) redistributing instructional responsibilities across colleagues and students. Implications for administrative practice, teacher education, and future research are discussed.

[1]  Helene Hembrooke,et al.  Activity-Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems , 2004 .

[2]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  Race, Gender, and Information Technology Use: The New Digital Divide , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  D. Ball.  With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model , 2010 .

[5]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching , 2001 .

[6]  Gretchen B. Rossman,et al.  Designing qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[7]  William E. Blanton,et al.  Chapter 7: Telecommunications and Teacher Education: A Social Constructivist Review , 1998 .

[8]  M. Cole.  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 2002 .

[10]  Harold Wenglinsky.  Using Technology Wisely: The Keys to Success in Schools , 2005 .

[11]  Ellen B. Mandinach,et al.  A Retrospective on Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy , 2005 .

[12]  Ann Locke Davidson,et al.  Bringing the Internet to School: Lessons from an Urban District , 2002 .

[13]  Deborah M. Switzer,et al.  K-12 Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs About and Use of Inquiry in the Classroom , 2009 .

[14]  Margaret Walshaw,et al.  The Teacher’s Role in Classroom Discourse: A Review of Recent Research Into Mathematics Classrooms , 2008 .

[15]  K. Sahl,et al.  Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture , 2002 .

[16]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Teachers' Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching and School Context , 2007 .

[17]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  How Computers are Used in United States Schools: Basic Data from the 1989 I.E.A. Computers in Education Survey , 1991 .

[18]  L. Radford,et al.  Perceiving the General: The Multisemiotic Dimension of Students' Algebraic Activity , 2007 .

[19]  M. Bakia,et al.  National Educational Technology Trends Study: Local-Level Data Summary. , 2008 .

[20]  F. Sarracino,et al.  All that Glitters Ain’t Gold! , 2013 .

[21]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Resources, Instruction, and Research , 2003 .

[22]  M. Lampert.  How Do Teachers Manage to Teach? Perspectives on Problems in Practice , 1985 .

[23]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[24]  Jeffrey M. Kenton,et al.  Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening , 2005 .

[25]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[26]  Rosemary E. Sutton.  Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research , 1991 .

[27]  Daniel Chazan,et al.  Beyond Formulas in Mathematics and Teaching: Dynamics of the High School Algebra Classroom , 2000 .

[28]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[29]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Situating Teachers’ Instructional Practices in the Institutional Setting of the School and District , 2003 .

[30]  James Laffey,et al.  Supporting Learning and Behavior of At-Risk Young Children , 2003 .

[31]  Bonnie A. Nardi.  Some reflections on the application of activity theory , 1995 .

[32]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[33]  D. Martin.  Mathematics Success and Failure Among African-American Youth: The Roles of Sociohistorical Context, Community Forces, School Influence, and Individual Agency , 2000 .

[34]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2007 .

[35]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[36]  Mike Thomas,et al.  Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator , 2000 .

[37]  Young ae Hahn,et al.  Activity Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems , 2005 .

[38]  D. Cohen.  Educational Technology, Policy, and Practice , 1987 .

[39]  H. Becker.  How Are Teachers Using Computers in Instruction? , 2001 .

[40]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Results from California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes , 2004 .

[42]  Eugene Matusov,et al.  In Search of `the Appropriate' Unit of Analysis for Sociocultural Research , 2007 .

[43]  R. Lehrer,et al.  Technology and mathematics education , 2008 .

[44]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[45]  S. Hennessy,et al.  A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning , 2002 .

[46]  William E. Blanton,et al.  Chapter 7: Telecommunications and Teacher Education: A Social Constructivist Review , 1998 .

[47]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Mathematical Knowledge of Middle School Teachers: Implications for the No Child Left Behind Policy Initiative , 2007 .

[48]  J. C. Collins,et al.  Good to great and the social sectors : why business thinking is not the answer : a monograph to accompany good to great : why some companies make the leap--and others don't , 2005 .

[49]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Technology-Rich Inquiry Science in Urban Classrooms: What are the Barriers to Inquiry Pedagogy? , 2002 .

[50]  V. Kaptelinin.  The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker , 2005 .

[51]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[52]  Ewa McGrail.  Teachers, Technology, and Change: English Teachers’ Perspectives , 2005 .

[53]  Jared Keengwe,et al.  Technology Integration Barriers in K-12 Urban Classrooms , 2010 .

[54]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations , 1992 .

[55]  M. Windschitl.  Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers , 2002 .

[56]  Cheryl A. Franklin.  Factors That Influence Elementary Teachers Use of Computers , 2005 .

[57]  A. Ball.  Toward a Theory of Generative Change in Culturally and Linguistically Complex Classrooms , 2009 .

[58]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[59]  Emiel W. Owens,et al.  Differences among Urban, Suburban, and Rural Schools on Technology Access and Use in Eighth-Grade Mathematics Classrooms , 1995 .