MIMO OTA optical measurement device

Following the growing interest in Over The Air testing of Multiple Input Multiple Output handset antenna systems, this paper presents a non-galvanic measurement tool for early antenna performance estimation in the prototyping and testing stages of the development process. The necessity for removing the coaxial cables, is here demonstrated with an example MIMO parameter - correlation. It is found by simulations, that the presence of cables not only completely changes this parameter, but the concrete cable position can also be very significant. The device proposed here, uses two parallel RF-over-fiber channels with low power consumption in wideband operation. The achieved dynamic range is up to 60 dB with acceptable isolation for two particular design frequencies and up to one hour of operation on a single battery charge. The total electrical dimensions are 40×40×10 mm, making it suitable for typical phone mock-ups. It can be used in both anechoic, as well as stirred mode chambers.

[1]  Pekka Kyosti,et al.  MIMO OTA test concept with experimental and simulated verification , 2010, EuCAP 2010.

[2]  Ivor L. Morrow,et al.  ESA measurements using the Hybrid Fibre-Optic Reflection Measurement System , 2009, 2009 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference.

[3]  Jun-ichi Takada,et al.  MIMO channel capacity measurement in the presence of spatial clusters using a fading emulator , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[4]  J. Valenzuela-Valdés,et al.  Emulation of MIMO Nonisotropic Fading Environments With Reverberation Chambers , 2008, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[5]  Lars Manholm,et al.  The multi path simulator for over the air testing , 2010, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation.

[6]  Gert Frølund Pedersen,et al.  Assessment of the Physical Interface of UHF Passive Tags for Localization , 2007 .

[7]  W.A.Th. Kotterman,et al.  Cable-less measurement set-up for wireless handheld terminals , 2001, 12th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8598).

[8]  Tian Hong Loh,et al.  Measurement of electrically small antennas via optical fibre , 2009, 2009 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference.

[9]  R.G. Vaughan,et al.  Antenna diversity in mobile communications , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Transcoding Functions,et al.  Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; , 2009 .

[11]  Pertti Vainikainen,et al.  Use of balun chokes in small-antenna radiation measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Jesper O. Nielsen,et al.  On small antenna measurements in a realistic MIMO scenario , 2010, Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Antennas and Propagation.

[13]  Outi Kivekäs,et al.  Effect of the chassis length on the bandwidth, SAR, and efficiency of internal mobile phone antennas , 2003 .

[14]  Jesper O. Nielsen,et al.  Antennas in real environments , 2011, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).