REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAINEE LOGBOOKS

All trainees are required to keep a logbook as a record of the procedures they have carried out during their surgical training. However, the current logbook is only a record of work carried out and not of the outcome of the operations. It does not prepare the trainee for either a lifetime practice of surgical audit or for a lifetime of learning from the audit process. The logbook requirements of different training boards vary and consequently, trainees find the keeping of a logbook an inconsistent process with ill‐defined learning objectives. The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons should define what needs to be collected, how data should be verified and how experience and learning should be reported, and should approve electronic databases that meet logbook standards. The choice of database software and format can then be left to the trainee. Although there are good examples of electronic logbooks being developed, there is, at present, no perfect logbook available. We recommend that all trainees, from the commencement of basic surgical training, should keep a logbook that contains the minimum and expanded datasets in addition to specific trainee data on supervision and learning. In addition to the current reporting format focused on procedural casemix and supervision level, quality/outcome reports and a record of learning are recommended.

[1]  D. Watters,et al.  THE SURGICAL TRAINEE LOG WE NEED: MINIMUM OF WORK, MAXIMUM OF OUTPUT , 2006, ANZ journal of surgery.

[2]  D. Birks,et al.  Operative experience in the Victorian general surgical training programme , 2003, ANZ journal of surgery.

[3]  D. R. Lane Documentation of Emergency Medicine Resident Procedures Using a Personal Digital Assistant , 2003 .

[4]  Stephen Bolsin,et al.  Making the case for personal professional monitoring in health care. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[5]  S. Bolsin,et al.  Professional monitoring and critical incident reporting using personal digital assistants , 2002, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  A. Tøttrup Surveillance of surgical training by detailed electronic registration of logical components , 2002, Postgraduate medical journal.

[7]  G. Kiroff,et al.  Computer‐based logbook for surgical registrars , 2002, ANZ journal of surgery.

[8]  I. Birdi,et al.  Effect of surgical training on outcome and hospital costs in coronary surgery , 2001, Heart.

[9]  R. Aitken,et al.  Outcome in patients with colorectal cancer managed by surgical trainees , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[10]  C. Collins Surgical training, supervision, and service , 1999, BMJ.

[11]  M. Thompson,et al.  Training in large bowel cancer surgery: observations from three prospective regional United Kingdom audits , 1999, BMJ.

[12]  J. Lourie Delegation of orthopaedic workload. , 1998, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[13]  C. Galasko,et al.  Unsupervised surgical training , 1997, British medical journal.

[14]  J. Wilson Unsupervised surgical training: questionnaire study , 1997, BMJ.