IPv6 Transition Measurements in LTE and VHT Wi-Fi Mobile Networks

Full digital connectivity of the Internet of Things (IoT) devices demands several requirements including high-speed networks and a large number of IP addresses. The long term evolution (LTE) and very high throughput (VHT) 802.11ac networks are among the alternatives that can fulfill the speed requirements. To provide a large number of IP addresses, in addition to IPv4, LTE and 802.11ac also support IPv6. However, while the full digital connectivity cannot be fulfilled by IPv4 due to its limited address space and failure to support the scalability of the IoT applications, another major problem is that the potential benefits of IPv6 for LTE and 802.11ac mobile networks are completely ambiguous. The issue is further increased along with the design complexities inherent in LTE and 802.11ac infrastructures. Therefore, there are increasing concerns for cellular carriers and mobile service providers regarding migration to IPv6-only and whether the users in LTE-IPv6-only and 802.11ac-IPv6-only networks can achieve better performance than IPv4. To address the challenges associated with deploying IPv6-only in LTE and 802.11ac networks and quantify the performance, this work proposes a model. The model consists of a simulation environment with four distinct networks: LTE-IPv6-only, LTE-IPv4-only, 802.11ac-IPv6-only, and 802.11ac-IPv4-only. The model is further extended by setting up a real-world testbed environment to include four networks for replication of those simulations. To assure the most comprehensive environmental evaluation of the model, 128 distinct scenarios are developed and implemented, and the results are obtained in terms of quality of service parameters. The testbed results are compared to those of simulations to precisely assess the model.

[1]  Muhammad Asif,et al.  IPv6 QoS for Multimedia Applications: A Performance Analysis , 2019, ICSCA.

[2]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  WiFi, LTE, or Both?: Measuring Multi-Homed Wireless Internet Performance , 2014, Internet Measurement Conference.

[3]  Hiroaki Hazeyama,et al.  Empirical analysis of IPv6 transition technologies using the IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed , 2015, EAI Endorsed Trans. Ind. Networks Intell. Syst..

[4]  Marie-Laure Boucheret,et al.  Impacts of IPv6 on Robust Header Compression in LTE Mobile Networks , 2012, ICNS 2012.

[5]  Mehrdad Sabetzadeh,et al.  Dynamic Adaptive Network Configuration for IoT Systems: A Search-based Approach , 2019, ArXiv.

[6]  Weizhi Ma,et al.  Performance test of IEEE 802.11ac wireless devices , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI).

[7]  Jae-Hyoung Yoo,et al.  IPv4 and IPv6 performance comparison in IPv6 LTE network , 2015, 2015 17th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS).

[8]  Moritz Steiner,et al.  A case for faster mobile web in cellular IPv6 networks , 2016, MobiCom.

[10]  Long Hoang A Study of Internet Protocols , 2019 .

[11]  R M Banakar,et al.  Performance Analysis of IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Mechanisms , 2018, 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA).

[12]  Talal M. Alghamdi Throughput Analysis of IEEE WLAN “802.11 ac” Under WEP, WPA, and WPA2 Security Protocols , 2019 .

[13]  Ladislav Huraj,et al.  A Study of DDoS Reflection Attack on Internet of Things in IPv4/IPv6 Networks , 2019, CSOC.

[14]  Eric Gamess,et al.  Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms , 2016 .

[15]  Teguh Firmansyah,et al.  Performance comparison of transmitting jumbo frame on Windows and Linux System , 2019, TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control).

[16]  Fazirulhisyam Hashim,et al.  The Integrated versus Standalone Operation Mode for Second and Subsequent Fragments Headers Compression Scheme in 6LoWPAN , 2015 .

[17]  Daqing Gu,et al.  An Analysis of Impact of IPv6 on QoS in LTE Networks , 2013, ICNS 2013.

[18]  Youki Kadobayashi,et al.  Comprehensive Survey of IPv6 Transition Technologies: A Subjective Classification for Security Analysis , 2019, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[19]  Varsha Jain,et al.  Impact of IPv4, IPv6 and Dual Stack Interface over Wireless Networks , 2018 .

[20]  Patrick Appiah-Kubi,et al.  Performance Study of the Impact of Security on 802.11ac Networks , 2018 .

[21]  Ruhani Ab Rahman,et al.  Performance comparison analysis of E2E Dual-Stack IP protocol method over wired and Wi-Fi broadband access , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT).

[22]  Samad S. Kolahi,et al.  The impact of human shadowing/movement on performance of 802.11ac client-to-server WLAN , 2019 .

[23]  Shishupal Kumar,et al.  An energy efficient IPv6 packet delivery scheme for industrial IoT over G.9959 protocol based Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) , 2019, Comput. Networks.