SAR target classification using sparse representations and spatial pyramids

We consider the problem of automatically classifying targets in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery using image partitioning and sparse representation based feature vector generation. Specifically, we extend the spatial pyramid approach, in which the image is partitioned into increasingly fine sub-regions, by using a sparse representation to describe the local features in each sub-region. These feature descriptors are generated by identifying those dictionary elements, created via k-means clustering, that best approximate the local features for each sub-region. By systematically combining the results at each pyramid level, classification ability is facilitated by approximate geometric matching. Results using a linear SVM for classification along with SIFT, FFT-magnitude and DCT-based local feature descriptors indicate that the use of a single element from the dictionary to describe the local features is sufficient for accurate target classification. Continuing work both in feature extraction and classification will be discussed, with emphasis placed on the need for classification amid heavy target occlusion.

[1]  Thomas Serre,et al.  Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[2]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[3]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of equations, the minimal 𝓁1‐norm near‐solution approximates the sparsest near‐solution , 2006 .

[4]  Pietro Perona,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[5]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Pyramid Match Kernels: Discriminative Classification with Sets of Image Features (version 2) , 2006 .

[6]  G. J. Owirka,et al.  Template-based SAR ATR performance using different image enhancement techniques , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Jean Ponce,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of Feature Pooling in Visual Recognition , 2010, ICML.

[8]  Eric R. Keydel,et al.  MSTAR extended operating conditions: a tutorial , 1996, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[9]  Qun Zhao,et al.  Support vector machines for SAR automatic target recognition , 2001 .

[10]  Yihong Gong,et al.  Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification , 2009, CVPR.

[11]  Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan,et al.  Sparse representations for automatic target classification in SAR images , 2010, 2010 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[12]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  The pyramid match kernel: discriminative classification with sets of image features , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[13]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Charles V. Jakowatz,et al.  Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[15]  Yihong Gong,et al.  Locality-constrained Linear Coding for image classification , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.