A TRIZ Approach to Reliable Megaproject Sustainability

Purposes: This article presents a recent research into megaproject sustainability with a particular focus on identifying a structure of its body of knowledge so as to establish the methodology of megaproject assessment on sustainability (MAS), which consists of a research roadmap toward megaproject sustainability and a system reliability analysis. In response to the research topic on “Reviews for Advanced Construction Management” at Frontiers in Built Environment, this article aims to make a contribution with the description about a generic approach to conducting literature review based on a whole range of relevant evidence in a systemic way. Methodology: The research described in this article is underpinned by the use of several methods. The nine-square process (NSP) of Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) is the method for facilitating a systemic evidence-based learning (EBL) process to identify further research into MAS. A normal process to establish research roadmap was then introduced to summarize what has been identified as specific research tasks alongside lifecycle processes on megaproject delivery, to which RIBA Plan of Work 2020 was adopted as the prototype. An event tree analysis (ETA) was eventually introduced by incorporating the novel measurements on system reliability to support quantitative MAS in terms of both practices and research. Findings: This article presents several findings from the described research, and these include that the use of NSP led to the formation of a systematic procedure for literature review, a procedure to support MAS, a research roadmap to facilitate efforts to be made for megaproject sustainability, and the feasibility of system reliability analysis to measure the status of sustainability underpinned by research and practices throughout megaproject lifecycle. Implications: The described research provides four modules to foster further research into megaproject sustainability, and these include a TRIZ-based module to facilitate systemic literature review for EBL, a lifecycle process module for MAS, a prototype research roadmap to guide research and development for megaproject sustainability, and an ETA module to support a system reliability analysis in the dynamic process of research and practices toward megaproject sustainability. Value: The research described in this article has made an initial effort to conduct a strategic review, development, analysis, and discussion about tactics for research and development toward megaproject sustainability. Research findings can be used for related research and practices with regard to technical guidance and best practices in megaproject delivery.

[1]  C. Lawrence Project perspectives , 2022, Strategic Direction.

[2]  E. Haezendonck,et al.  Patterns of Circular Transition: What Is the Circular Economy Maturity of Belgian Ports? , 2020, Sustainability.

[3]  Reliability Theory , 2020, Optimization Under Uncertainty with Applications to Aerospace Engineering.

[4]  Simon P. Philbin,et al.  Redefining the Use of Sustainable Development Goals at the Organisation and Project Levels—A Survey of Engineers , 2020, Administrative Sciences.

[5]  Heng Li,et al.  A Benefits Prioritization Analysis on Adopting BIM Systems Against Major Challenges in Megaproject Delivery , 2020, Frontiers in Built Environment.

[6]  Daan Schraven,et al.  Integrating Sustainability into Major Infrastructure Projects: Four Perspectives on Sustainable Tunnel Development , 2019, Sustainability.

[7]  Prince Boateng,et al.  A dynamic system approach to risk analysis for megaproject delivery , 2019 .

[8]  Marianne Davys,et al.  RIBA Plan of Work , 2019, Small Practice and the Sole Practitioner.

[9]  Zhen Chen,et al.  Grand Challenges in Construction Management , 2019, Front. Built Environ..

[10]  Zhen Chen Editorial , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability.

[11]  Dynamic Relationships between Mega Projects and Official Development Assistance: Case of South Korean Infrastructure Construction Projects in ASEAN’s Developing Countries , 2018, Sustainability.

[12]  Qing-hua He,et al.  How Does Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Affect the performance of megaprojects? Insights from a System Dynamic Simulation , 2018 .

[13]  Samuel Hayes,et al.  The Oxford handbook of megaproject management , 2018 .

[14]  L. K. Khatiwada Implementing a Post-Project Sustainability Study (PSS) of a Development Project: Lessons Learned from Indonesia , 2017 .

[15]  Zhen Chen,et al.  A research roadmap for megaproject sustainability assessment , 2017 .

[16]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[17]  Zhen Chen The principles of facilities management and case studies , 2017 .

[18]  Prince Boateng,et al.  Megaproject Risk Analysis and Simulation: A Dynamic Systems Approach , 2017 .

[19]  S. Barrett Addressing significant weather impacts on airports: quick start guide and toolkit. , 2016 .

[20]  M. Rafieian,et al.  Qualitative Sustainability Assessment of the Large- Scale Redevelopment Plan in Samen District of Mashhad , 2016 .

[21]  Mauro Luiz Martens,et al.  The challenge of introducing sustainability into project management function: multiple-case studies , 2016 .

[22]  Zhen Chen,et al.  Environmental Management in Construction: A Quantitative Approach , 2016 .

[23]  Heng Li,et al.  Environmental Management in Construction , 2016 .

[24]  Zhen Chen,et al.  An Analytical Network Process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects , 2015 .

[25]  L. Hart Procuring Successful Mega-Projects: How to Establish Major Government Contracts Without Ending up in Court , 2015 .

[26]  Emmanuel Rey,et al.  An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas , 2015 .

[27]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  ANP Experiment for Demolition Plan Evaluation , 2014 .

[28]  Hugo Priemus,et al.  International Handbook on Mega-Projects , 2014 .

[29]  Dale Sinclair Guide to Using the RIBA Plan of Work 2013 , 2013 .

[30]  Virginia A. Greiman,et al.  Megaproject Management: Lessons on Risk and Project Management from the Big Dig , 2013 .

[31]  Wied Ruijssenaars,et al.  Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning , 2012 .

[32]  Qian Xu,et al.  A total environmental risk assessment model for international hub airports , 2011 .

[33]  Edward W. Merrow,et al.  Industrial Megaprojects: Concepts, Strategies, and Practices for Success , 2011 .

[34]  Karen Gadd,et al.  TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving , 2011 .

[35]  Karen Gadd,et al.  TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving: Gadd/TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving , 2011 .

[36]  Yupo Chan,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making , 2011 .

[37]  Complex Project Management Global Perspectives and the Strategic Agenda to 2025 , 2011 .

[38]  Zhen Chen ANP models and STEEP criteria , 2010 .

[39]  David Vernon,et al.  Research road map , 2010 .

[40]  Zhen Chen,et al.  An analytic network process for risks assessment in commercial real estate development , 2009 .

[41]  Qian Xu,et al.  The Disaster-Oriented Assessment of Urban Clusters for Locating Production Systems in China , 2008 .

[42]  Thomas G Rundall,et al.  Evidence-based management reconsidered. , 2006, Frontiers of health services management.

[43]  F. Eitel,et al.  Evidence-Based Learning. , 1999 .

[44]  Michael Cheema Shabbir Bamberger,et al.  Case studies of project sustainability : implications for policy and operations from Asian experience , 1990 .

[45]  Colin W. Clipson,et al.  Integrated Approaches to Facilities Planning and Assessment. , 1987 .

[46]  S. W. Holman A challenge. , 1955, Medical technicians bulletin.