Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus Attachment Patterns on Glass Surfaces with Nanoscale Roughness

Attachment tendencies of Escherichia coli K12, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027, and Staphylococcus aureus CIP 68.5 onto glass surfaces of different degrees of nanometer-scale roughness have been studied. Contact-angle and surface-charge measurements, atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were employed to characterize substrata and bacterial surfaces. Modification of the glass surface resulted in nanometer-scale changes in the surface topography, whereas the physicochemical characteristics of the surfaces remained almost constant. AFM analysis indicated that the overall surface roughness parameters were reduced by 60–70%. SEM, CLSM, and AFM analysis clearly demonstrates that although E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus present significantly different patterns of attachment, all of the species exhibited a greater propensity for adhesion to the “nano-smooth” surface. The bacteria responded to the surface modification with a remarkable change in cellular metabolic activity, as shown by the characteristic cell morphologies, production of extracellular polymeric substances, and an increase in the number of bacterial cells undergoing attachment.

[1]  James Wang,et al.  Impact of nano‐topography on bacterial attachment , 2008, Biotechnology journal.

[2]  A. Peschel,et al.  Key Role of Teichoic Acid Net Charge inStaphylococcus aureus Colonization of Artificial Surfaces , 2001, Infection and Immunity.

[3]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Bacterial deposition in a parallel plate and a stagnation point flow chamber: microbial adhesion mechanisms depend on the mass transport conditions. , 2002, Microbiology.

[4]  Yatao Liu,et al.  Microscale correlation between surface chemistry, texture, and the adhesive strength of Staphylococcus epidermidis. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  Brian J. Mailloux,et al.  Theoretical prediction of collision efficiency between adhesion-deficient bacteria and sediment grain surface , 2002 .

[6]  Didem Öner,et al.  Ultrahydrophobic Surfaces. Effects of Topography Length Scales on Wettability , 2000 .

[7]  A. Routh,et al.  Bacterial quorum sensing and cell surface electrokinetic properties , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[8]  R. Kolter,et al.  Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  P. Stoddart,et al.  Nanostructured optical fiber with surface-enhanced Raman scattering functionality. , 2005, Optics letters.

[10]  J. Feijen,et al.  Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[11]  Ali Beskok,et al.  Zeta Potential of Selected Bacteria in Drinking Water When Dead, Starved, or Exposed to Minimal and Rich Culture Media , 2007, Current Microbiology.

[12]  B. Logan,et al.  Effect of molecular scale roughness of glass beads on colloidal and bacterial deposition. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Glenn A. Burks,et al.  Macroscopic and Nanoscale Measurements of the Adhesion of Bacteria with Varying Outer Layer Surface Composition , 2003 .

[14]  G. Satta,et al.  Lipoteichoic acid as a new target for activity of antibiotics: mode of action of daptomycin (LY146032) , 1990, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[15]  F. Riedewald Bacterial adhesion to surfaces: the influence of surface roughness. , 2006, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[16]  L. Truelstrup Hansen,et al.  Effects of physicochemical surface characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains on attachment to glass. , 2006, Food microbiology.

[17]  A J Scardino,et al.  Testing attachment point theory: diatom attachment on microtextured polyimide biomimics , 2006, Biofouling.

[18]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Atomic force microscopic corroboration of bond aging for adhesion of Streptococcus thermophilus to solid substrata. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[19]  R. Advíncula,et al.  Surface analysis and biocorrosion properties of nanostructured surface sol-gel coatings on Ti6Al4V titanium alloy implants. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[20]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Effects of cell surface damage on surface properties and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[21]  H C van der Mei,et al.  Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions--its mechanisms and methods for study. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[22]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Electrophoretic Mobility Distributions of Single-Strain Microbial Populations , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  David Quéré,et al.  Slippy and sticky microtextured solids , 2003 .

[24]  Anjali Mandlik,et al.  Pili in Gram-positive bacteria: assembly, involvement in colonization and biofilm development. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[25]  T. Beveridge,et al.  The surface physicochemistry and adhesiveness of Shewanella are affected by their surface polysaccharides. , 2007, Microbiology.

[26]  B. Behrends,et al.  A review of surface roughness in antifouling coatings illustrating the importance of cutoff length , 2006, Biofouling.

[27]  K. Whitehead,et al.  The effect of surface topography on the retention of microorganisms , 2006 .

[28]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  Design and microstructuring of PDMS surfaces for improved marine biofouling resistance , 2000, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.