Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks

PURPOSE While MR-only treatment planning using synthetic CTs (synCTs) offers potential for streamlining clinical workflow, a need exists for an efficient and automated synCT generation in the brain to facilitate near real-time MR-only planning. This work describes a novel method for generating brain synCTs based on generative adversarial networks (GANs), a deep learning model that trains two competing networks simultaneously, and compares it to a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS Post-Gadolinium T1-Weighted and CT-SIM images from fifteen brain cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. The GAN model was developed to generate synCTs using T1-weighted MRI images as the input using a residual network (ResNet) as the generator. The discriminator is a CNN with five convolutional layers that classified the input image as real or synthetic. Fivefold cross-validation was performed to validate our model. GAN performance was compared to CNN based on mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) metrics between the synCT and CT images. RESULTS GAN training took ~11 h with a new case testing time of 5.7 ± 0.6 s. For GAN, MAEs between synCT and CT-SIM were 89.3 ± 10.3 Hounsfield units (HU) and 41.9 ± 8.6 HU across the entire FOV and tissues, respectively. However, MAE in the bone and air was, on average, ~240-255 HU. By comparison, the CNN model had an average full FOV MAE of 102.4 ± 11.1 HU. For GAN, the mean PSNR was 26.6 ± 1.2 and SSIM was 0.83 ± 0.03. GAN synCTs preserved details better than CNN, and regions of abnormal anatomy were well represented on GAN synCTs. CONCLUSIONS We developed and validated a GAN model using a single T1-weighted MR image as the input that generates robust, high quality synCTs in seconds. Our method offers strong potential for supporting near real-time MR-only treatment planning in the brain.

[1]  Hans Herzog,et al.  Template based attenuation correction for PET in MR-PET scanners , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  V S Khoo,et al.  New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[4]  K Mishima,et al.  A new method for determining the optimal CT threshold for extracting the upper airway. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  Akihiro Takemura,et al.  The use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy: a phantom study for setting internal target volume of biological target volume , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[6]  H. Herzog,et al.  Alternative methods for attenuation correction for PET images in MR-PET scanners , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  Kenneth Ulin,et al.  Results of a multi-institutional benchmark test for cranial CT/MR image registration. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[10]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Minsong Cao,et al.  Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy. , 2016, Medical physics.

[12]  C. Njeh,et al.  Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy , 2008, Journal of medical physics.

[13]  G M Bydder,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of short T2 components in tissue. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[14]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Carri Glide-Hurst,et al.  Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images in Brain Cancer. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  G A Whitfield,et al.  Imaging and target volume delineation in glioma. , 2014, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[17]  Juha Korhonen,et al.  Dosimetric characterization of MRI-only treatment planning for brain tumors in atlas-based pseudo-CT images generated from standard T1-weighted MR images. , 2016, Medical physics.

[18]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[19]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Multi-class Generative Adversarial Networks with the L2 Loss Function , 2016, ArXiv.

[20]  Mary Feng,et al.  Quantitative characterizations of ultrashort echo (UTE) images for supporting air–bone separation in the head , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Adam Johansson,et al.  Accuracy of inverse treatment planning on substitute CT images derived from MR data for brain lesions , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[22]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-Time with Adaptive Instance Normalization , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[23]  Miklós Emri,et al.  Population based ranking of frameless CT-MRI registration methods. , 2015, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[24]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[25]  Adam Johansson,et al.  CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. , 2011, Medical physics.

[26]  Xiao Han,et al.  MR‐based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method , 2017, Medical physics.

[27]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[28]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Magnetic Resonance-Based Automatic Air Segmentation for Generation of Synthetic Computed Tomography Scans in the Head Region. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Mary Feng,et al.  Assessing the Dosimetric Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance-Generated Synthetic CT Images for Focal Brain VMAT Radiation Therapy. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[32]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Robust CT Synthesis for Radiotherapy Planning: Application to the Head and Neck Region , 2015, MICCAI.

[33]  Christian Ledig,et al.  Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[34]  M van Herk,et al.  Target volumes in radiotherapy for high-grade malignant glioma of the brain. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[35]  Yuta Shibamoto,et al.  Validation of accuracy in image co-registration with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Gamma Knife radiosurgery , 2014, Journal of radiation research.

[36]  Su Ruan,et al.  Medical Image Synthesis with Context-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks , 2016, MICCAI.

[37]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).