Time‐Fractional Flow Equations (t‐FFEs) to Upscale Transient Groundwater Flow Characterized by Temporally Non‐Darcian Flow Due to Medium Heterogeneity

Upscaling groundwater flow is a fundamental challenge in hydrogeology. This study proposed time‐fractional flow equations (t‐FFEs) for upscaling long‐term, transient groundwater flow and propagation of pressure heads in heterogeneous media. Monte Carlo simulations showed that, with increasing variance and correlation of the hydraulic conductivity (K), flow dynamics gradually deviated from Darcian flow and exhibit sub‐diffusive, time‐dependent evolution which can be separated into three major stages. At the early stage, the interconnected high‐K zones dominated flow, while at intermediate times, the transverse flow due to mixed high‐ and low‐K zones caused delayed rise of the piezometric head. At late times when flow in the relatively high‐K domains reached stability, cells with very low‐K continued to block the entry of water and generate “islands” with low piezometric head, significantly extending the temporal evolution of the piezometric head. The elongated water breakthrough curve cannot be quantified by the flow equation with an effective K, the space‐fractional flow equation, or the multi‐rate mass transfer (MRMT) flow model with a few rates, motivating the development of t‐FFEs assuming temporally non‐Darcian flow. Model applications showed that both the early and intermediate stages of flow dynamics can be captured by a single‐index t‐FFE (whose index is the exponent of the power‐law probability density function of the random operational time for water parcels), but the overall evolution of flow dynamics, especially the enhanced retention of flow at later times, required a distributed‐order t‐FFE with variable indexes for different flow phases that can dominate flow dynamics at different stages. Therefore, transient groundwater flow in aquifers with spatially stationary heterogeneity can be temporally non‐Darcian and non‐stationary, due to the time‐sensitive, combined effects of interconnected high‐K channels and isolated low‐K deposits on flow dynamics (which is the hydrogeological mechanism for the temporally non‐Darcian flow and sub‐diffusive pressure propagation), whose long‐term behavior can be quantified by multi‐index stochastic models.

[1]  D. Wei,et al.  Permeability of Uniformly Graded 3D Printed Granular Media , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[2]  C. Strangfeld Determination of the diffusion coefficient and the hydraulic conductivity of porous media based on embedded humidity sensors , 2020 .

[3]  C. Zheng,et al.  Nonlocal transport models for capturing solute transport in one‐dimensional sand columns: Model review, applicability, limitations and improvement , 2020, Hydrological Processes.

[4]  Abiola D. Obembe A fractional diffusion model for single-well simulation in geological media , 2020 .

[5]  G. Dagan,et al.  Equivalent and effective conductivities of heterogeneous aquifers for steady source flow, with illustration for hydraulic tomography , 2020 .

[6]  A. Boschan,et al.  On the multiscale characterization of effective hydraulic conductivity in random heterogeneous media: A historical survey and some new perspectives , 2020 .

[7]  R. Hunt,et al.  Assessment of NMR Logging for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers , 2020, Ground water.

[8]  C. Zheng,et al.  Super-diffusion affected by hydrofacies mean length and source geometry in alluvial settings , 2020, Journal of Hydrology.

[9]  Federico Municchi,et al.  Generalized multirate models for conjugate transfer in heterogeneous materials , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[10]  Hongwei Zhou,et al.  Modeling non-Darcian flow and solute transport in porous media with the Caputo–Fabrizio derivative , 2019, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[11]  Hongwei Zhou,et al.  Fractional derivative approach to non-Darcian flow in porous media , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[12]  Hongguang Sun,et al.  A fully subordinated linear flow model for hillslope subsurface stormflow , 2017 .

[13]  Xavier Sanchez-Vila,et al.  Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: Why stochastic modeling has not yet permeated into practitioners? , 2016 .

[14]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: A geologic perspective , 2016 .

[15]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: The relevance of stochastic subsurface hydrology to practical problems of contaminant transport and remediation. What is characterization and stochastic theory good for? , 2016 .

[16]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: Does stochastic subsurface hydrology help solving practical problems of contaminant hydrogeology? , 2016 .

[17]  H. Rajaram Debates—Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to practice: Introduction , 2016 .

[18]  Liancun Zheng,et al.  Flow and heat transfer of a generalized Maxwell fluid with modified fractional Fourier's law and Darcy's law , 2016 .

[19]  Marco Bianchi,et al.  A lithofacies approach for modeling non‐Fickian solute transport in a heterogeneous alluvial aquifer , 2016 .

[20]  Massimiliano Zingales,et al.  A mechanical picture of fractional-order Darcy equation , 2015, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[21]  Hossein Jafari,et al.  A mathematical model for simulation of a water table profile between two parallel subsurface drains using fractional derivatives , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[22]  Jianchao Cai,et al.  PREDICTION OF EFFECTIVE PERMEABILITY IN POROUS MEDIA BASED ON SPONTANEOUS IMBIBITION EFFECT , 2012 .

[23]  R. Raghavan Fractional derivatives: Application to transient flow , 2011 .

[24]  M. Dentz,et al.  Distribution- versus correlation-induced anomalous transport in quenched random velocity fields. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[25]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  A subordinated kinematic wave equation for heavy-tailed flow responses from heterogeneous hillslopes , 2010 .

[26]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  A general real-time formulation for multi-rate mass transfer problems , 2009 .

[27]  A. Cloot,et al.  A generalised groundwater flow equation using the concept of non-integer order derivatives , 2007 .

[28]  Boris Baeumer,et al.  Predicting the Tails of Breakthrough Curves in Regional‐Scale Alluvial Systems , 2007, Ground water.

[29]  C. Knudby,et al.  A continuous time random walk approach to transient flow in heterogeneous porous media , 2006 .

[30]  X. Sanchez‐Vila,et al.  Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow , 2006 .

[31]  M. Naber DISTRIBUTED ORDER FRACTIONAL SUB-DIFFUSION , 2003, math-ph/0311047.

[32]  D. Benson,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity, velocity, and the order of the fractional dispersion derivative in a highly heterogeneous system , 2002 .

[33]  Kharkov,et al.  Retarding subdiffusion and accelerating superdiffusion governed by distributed-order fractional diffusion equations. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  David A. Benson,et al.  Subordinated advection‐dispersion equation for contaminant transport , 2001 .

[35]  Sean Andrew McKenna,et al.  On the late‐time behavior of tracer test breakthrough curves , 2000 .

[36]  J. Klafter,et al.  The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach , 2000 .

[37]  Ji-Huan He Approximate analytical solution for seepage flow with fractional derivatives in porous media , 1998 .

[38]  Timothy D. Scheibe,et al.  Scaling of flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous groundwater systems , 1998 .

[39]  P. Renard,et al.  Calculating equivalent permeability: a review , 1997 .

[40]  J. Gómez-Hernández,et al.  Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: An overview , 1996 .

[41]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Heterogeneity in Sedimentary Deposits: A Review of Structure‐Imitating, Process‐Imitating, and Descriptive Approaches , 1996 .

[42]  L. Gelhar Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology , 1992 .

[43]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Determination of the effective hydraulic conductivity for heterogeneous porous media using a numerical spectral approach: 1. Method , 1992 .

[44]  Edward J. Garboczi,et al.  Permeability, diffusivity, and microstructural parameters: A critical review , 1990 .

[45]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  A stochastic approach to the problem of upscaling of conductivity in disordered media: Theory and unconditional numerical simulations , 1990 .

[46]  S. Whitaker Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy's law , 1986 .

[47]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[48]  H. Watanabe Comment on Izbash's equation , 1982 .

[49]  R. Raghavan,et al.  Subdiffusive flow in a composite medium with a communicating (absorbing) interface , 2020, Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles.

[50]  H. Pu,et al.  Coupling effects of porosity and particle size on seepage properties of broken sandstone based on fractional flow equation , 2019, Thermal Science.

[51]  A. W. Harbaugh MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process , 2005 .

[52]  John H. Cushman,et al.  The Physics of Fluids in Hierarchical Porous Media: Angstroms to Miles , 1997 .

[53]  P. Domenico,et al.  Physical and chemical hydrogeology , 1990 .

[54]  S. Ergun Fluid flow through packed columns , 1952 .

[55]  Yury F. Luchko Initial-boundary-value problems for the generalized multi-term time-fractional diffusion equation , 2011 .