Slip and fall accident prevention: A review of research, practice, and regulations

Abstract This paper summarizes current research, practices, and regulations regarding walking/working surface slipperiness and coefficient of friction (COF) measurements. The literature and data are reviewed from three aspects: 1. (a) the biomechanics of walking and psychophysiological factors involved in slips and falls studied by the scientific community, 2. (b) various measuring devices and methods developed in an attempt to quantify the “slipperiness” of walking/working surfaces, and 3. (c) an acceptable quantitative standard for the “slipperiness” of surfaces and the impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) on such a standard. Unresolved issues related to slip-resistance are identified. A multifaceted approach and synergy from researchers, the building industries, standards organizations, and government are needed to obtain concensus on such issues.

[1]  L Strandberg,et al.  On accident analysis and slip-resistance measurement. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[2]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  The dynamics of slipping accidents , 1981 .

[3]  James M. Miller,et al.  "Slippery" work surfaces: Towards a performance definition and quantitative coefficient of friction criteria , 1983 .

[4]  H H Cohen,et al.  Fall accident patterns: characterization of most frequent work surface-related injuries. , 1982, Professional safety.

[5]  D. I. James.  Rubbers and plastics in shoes and flooring: the importance of kinetic friction , 1983 .

[6]  R Majcherczyk.  A Different Approach to Measuring Pedestrian Friction: The CEBTP Skidmeter , 1978 .

[7]  L. Sjøflot,et al.  The tractor as a work-place A preliminary report on a survey among Norwegian farmers and tractor drivers , 1982 .

[8]  Miller Bc.  In plane view: blind spots and visual limits , 1994 .

[9]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of slip-resistance measurement devices , 1985 .

[10]  Bohdan T. Kulakowski,et al.  Slip Resistance Needs of the Mobility Disabled During Level and Grade Walking , 1990 .

[11]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  Development of coefficient of friction measurement methods by consensus-standards-making organizations , 1985 .

[12]  Rd Jablonsky,et al.  Biomechanical Measurements: Pedestrian Coefficient of Friction , 1990 .

[13]  R Tideiksaar.  The Biomedical and Environmental Characteristics of Slips, Stumbles, and Falls in the Elderly , 1990 .

[14]  R Grönqvist,et al.  Slipperiness of the shoe-floor interface: comparison of objective and subjective assessments. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  W English.  Improved Tribometry on Walking Surfaces , 1990 .

[16]  F. Malkin,et al.  On-site testing of shoe and floor combinations , 1983 .

[17]  R E Schlegel,et al.  Coefficient of Friction and Subjective Assessment of Slippery Work Surfaces , 1992, Human factors.

[18]  M Tisserand,et al.  Progress in the prevention of falls caused by slipping. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[19]  J. M. Miller,et al.  Work surface friction coefficients: a survey of relevant factors and measurement methodology , 1976 .

[20]  Da Schieb,et al.  Frictional and Ground Reaction Force Measurement with the Multicomponent Quartz Force Plate , 1990 .

[21]  M. P. Wilson,et al.  Slip resistance testing of shoes — new developments , 1983 .

[22]  P. R. Davis,et al.  Human factors contributing to slips, trips and falls. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[23]  Rl Meltzer,et al.  Evaluation of Some Factors Affecting Measurements of Slip Resistance of Shoe Sole Materials on Floor Surfaces , 1976 .

[24]  D Zohar,et al.  Why Do We Bump into Things while Walking , 1978, Human factors.

[25]  R Braun,et al.  A Comparison of Two Slip-Resistance Testers , 1978 .

[26]  H.Harvey Cohen,et al.  Psychophysical assessment of the perceived slipperiness of floor tile surfaces in a laboratory setting , 1994 .

[27]  H. Cohen,et al.  Perceptions of walking surface slipperiness under realistic conditions, utilizing a slipperiness rating scale , 1994 .