Exhaustive docking and solvated interaction energy scoring: lessons learned from the SAMPL4 challenge

We continued prospective assessments of the Wilma–solvated interaction energy (SIE) platform for pose prediction, binding affinity prediction, and virtual screening on the challenging SAMPL4 data sets including the HIV-integrase inhibitor and two host–guest systems. New features of the docking algorithm and scoring function are tested here prospectively for the first time. Wilma–SIE provides good correlations with actual binding affinities over a wide range of binding affinities that includes strong binders as in the case of SAMPL4 host–guest systems. Absolute binding affinities are also reproduced with appropriate training of the scoring function on available data sets or from comparative estimation of the change in target’s vibrational entropy. Even when binding modes are known, SIE predictions lack correlation with experimental affinities within dynamic ranges below 2 kcal/mol as in the case of HIV-integrase ligands, but they correctly signaled the narrowness of the dynamic range. Using a common protein structure for all ligands can reduce the noise, while incorporating a more sophisticated solvation treatment improves absolute predictions. The HIV-integrase virtual screening data set consists of promiscuous weak binders with relatively high flexibility and thus it falls outside of the applicability domain of the Wilma–SIE docking platform. Despite these difficulties, unbiased docking around three known binding sites of the enzyme resulted in over a third of ligands being docked within 2 Å from their actual poses and over half of the ligands docked in the correct site, leading to better-than-random virtual screening results.

[1]  Imran Siddiqi,et al.  Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities, 1. Exploring the Parameter Space , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  B. Gibb,et al.  Well-defined, organic nanoenvironments in water: the hydrophobic effect drives a capsular assembly. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Symmetry numbers for rigid, flexible, and fluxional molecules: theory and applications. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  Molecular surface generation using marching tetrahedra , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  Scott P. Brown,et al.  Large-scale application of high-throughput molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann surface area for routine physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Exhaustive search and solvated interaction energy (SIE) for virtual screening and affinity prediction , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[8]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[9]  Sathesh Bhat,et al.  Molecular surface generation using a variable‐radius solvent probe , 2005, Proteins.

[10]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[12]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Host-guest complexes with protein-ligand-like affinities: computational analysis and design. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  M. Gilson,et al.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Nicolas Moitessier,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  Traian Sulea,et al.  The solvated interaction energy method for scoring binding affinities. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  Hao Sun,et al.  Calorimetric Analysis of the 1:1 Complexes Formed between a Water-soluble Deep-cavity Cavitand, and Cyclic and Acyclic Carboxylic Acids , 2008 .

[17]  J. Newman,et al.  Structural Basis for a New Mechanism of Inhibition of H I V-1 Integrase Identified by Fragment Screening and Structure-Based Design , 2011, Antiviral chemistry & chemotherapy.

[18]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  New ultrahigh affinity host-guest complexes of cucurbit[7]uril with bicyclo[2.2.2]octane and adamantane guests: thermodynamic analysis and evaluation of M2 affinity calculations. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 Scoring Exercise , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  A new tetrahedral tesselation scheme for isosurface generation , 1998, Comput. Graph..

[22]  G. Klebe,et al.  Approaches to the Description and Prediction of the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Ligands to Macromolecular Receptors , 2002 .

[23]  Thomas S. Peat,et al.  Small Molecule Inhibitors of the LEDGF Site of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Integrase Identified by Fragment Screening and Structure Based Design , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Correction to “Symmetry Numbers for Rigid, Flexible, and Fluxional Molecules: Theory and Applications” , 2013 .

[25]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules, 1. Development and Validation of FITTED 1.0 , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  David L Mobley,et al.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[28]  M. Rami Reddy,et al.  Free energy calculations in rational drug design , 2001 .

[29]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[30]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  Protein-ligand binding free energies from exhaustive docking. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[31]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[32]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Rapid Prediction of Solvation Free Energy. 2. The First-Shell Hydration (FiSH) Continuum Model. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[33]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[34]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of cyclodextrin binding affinities: energy, entropy, and implications for drug design. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[36]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[37]  Lyle Isaacs,et al.  Acyclic cucurbit[n]uril congeners are high affinity hosts. , 2010, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[38]  David L. Mobley,et al.  The SAMPL4 host–guest blind prediction challenge: an overview , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[39]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[40]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[41]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  A simple yet accurate boundary element method for continuum dielectric calculations , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[42]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  CSAR Benchmark Exercise of 2010: Selection of the Protein–Ligand Complexes , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[43]  Wei Chen,et al.  Modeling Protein-Ligand Binding by Mining Minima. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[44]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  Fast summation boundary element method for calculating solvation free energies of macromolecules , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  Marwen Naïm,et al.  Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein-protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.