Human-centric lighting performance of shading panels in architecture: A benchmarking study with lab scale physical models under real skies

Abstract This study investigates shading panels’ (SPs) impacts on daylighting features in a lab scale model in terms of parameters representing potential human eyes’ biological responses identified as image forming (IF) and non-image forming (NIF). IF responses enable vision and NIF responses regulate internal body clocks known as circadian clocks. Human-centric lighting evaluates photopic units, representing IF responses, and melanopic units representing NIF responses, combined with correlated color temperature (CCT) of light for potential biological effects. SPs’ impacts on such parameters of daylighting have not yet been studied. Previous research mostly studied panels’ impacts on visual comfort and glare related to IF responses. This research explores the impact of SPs’ color, reflectance, orientation, and openness on photopic and melanopic units and CCT of daylighting inside a 1:50 physical scale model of a space. Approximately 40 prototypes of SPs were evaluated. An experimental setup was designed under outdoor daylighting conditions to capture high dynamic range (HDR) images inside the model. HDR images were post processed to calculate and render the distribution of photopic and melanopic units, melanopic/photopic (M/P) ratios and CCTs in the captured viewpoint of the model. Results reveal the behavior of SPs’ color, reflectance, orientation, and openness in modifying daylighting parameters related to biological responses. Bluish panels, in particular, increase daylighting melanopic units and CCTs whereas reddish panels increase photopic units and reduce CCTs. The research results were discussed to provide an outline for future developments of panels to adapt daylighting to occupants' IF and NIF responses.

[1]  Daylighting in Architecture: A European Reference Book , 1993 .

[2]  Mehlika Inanici,et al.  Measuring circadian lighting through high dynamic range photography , 2018, Lighting Research & Technology.

[3]  MS Rea,et al.  Modelling the spectral sensitivity of the human circadian system , 2012 .

[4]  R. G. Hopkinson,et al.  Glare from daylighting in buildings. , 1972, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Jean-François Lalonde,et al.  A photobiological approach to biophilic design in extreme climates , 2019, Building and Environment.

[6]  Mbc Myriam Aries,et al.  Implementing non-image-forming effects of light in the built environment: A review on what we need , 2016 .

[7]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Editorial: Exploring human-centric lighting , 2016 .

[8]  Minchen Wei,et al.  The impact of room surface reflectance on corneal illuminance and rule-of-thumb equations for circadian lighting design , 2018, Building and Environment.

[9]  Claude Mh Demers,et al.  Effects of interior wood finishes on the lighting ambiance and materiality of architectural spaces , 2017 .

[10]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  M-C. Dubois,et al.  Daylighting metrics based on illuminance, distribution, glare and directivity , 2011 .

[12]  Jean-François Lalonde,et al.  Biophilic, photobiological and energy-efficient design framework of adaptive building façades for Northern Canada , 2020 .

[13]  B. Middleton,et al.  Human seasonal and circadian studies in Antarctica (Halley, 75°S). , 2017, General and comparative endocrinology.

[14]  P Raynham,et al.  SLL Lighting Handbook , 2009 .

[15]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs , 1997, SIGGRAPH '08.

[16]  Zhiguo Hu,et al.  Efficient circadian daylighting: A proposed equation, experimental validation, and the consequent importance of room surface reflectance , 2020 .

[17]  Claude Mh Demers,et al.  Lighting in the third dimension: laser scanning as an architectural survey and representation method , 2020, Intelligent Buildings International.

[18]  R. Nelson,et al.  Light at night as an environmental endocrine disruptor , 2017, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  Siobhan Francois Rockcastle,et al.  A human-centric approach to assess daylight in buildings for non-visual health potential, visual interest and gaze behavior , 2017 .

[20]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting , 2014 .

[21]  R. Kronauer,et al.  Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker. , 1999, Science.

[22]  Peter Boyce,et al.  Review: The Impact of Light in Buildings on Human Health , 2010 .

[23]  Ali Motamed,et al.  On-site monitoring and subjective comfort assessment of a sun shadings and electric lighting controller based on novel High Dynamic Range vision sensors , 2017 .

[24]  Yi Lin,et al.  Spatial and spectral illumination design for energy-efficient circadian lighting , 2018, Building and Environment.

[25]  Leora C Radetsky,et al.  Daylighting design for healthy environments: Analysis of educational spaces for optimal circadian stimulus , 2019, Solar Energy.

[26]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Tutorial: Luminance Maps for Daylighting Studies from High Dynamic Range Photography , 2020 .

[27]  D. Golombek,et al.  The times they’re a-changing: Effects of circadian desynchronization on physiology and disease , 2013, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[28]  Claude M. H. Demers,et al.  Wood perception in daylit interior spaces: An experimental study using scale models and questionnaires , 2019, BioResources.

[29]  Josephine Arendt,et al.  Shift work: coping with the biological clock. , 2010, Occupational medicine.

[30]  María Lovísa Ámundadóttir,et al.  Unified framework to evaluate non-visual spectral effectiveness of light for human health , 2017 .

[31]  E. Baron,et al.  An Introduction To Photobiology , 2018 .

[32]  Harry Giles,et al.  Solar shading performance of window with constant and dynamic shading function in different climate zones , 2017 .

[33]  Robert Clear,et al.  A practical metric for melanopic metrology , 2019, Lighting Research & Technology.

[34]  Karam M. Al-Obaidi,et al.  Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[35]  Aris Tsangrassoulis,et al.  Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: A literature review , 2016 .

[36]  Jiangtao Du,et al.  Glazing type (colour and transmittance), daylighting, and human performances at a workspace: A full-scale experiment in Beijing , 2019, Building and Environment.