The efficacy and safety of three concentrations of levobupivacaine administered as a continuous epidural infusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

UNLABELLED We evaluated the efficacy and safety of three concentrations of levobupivacaine infused epidurally as analgesia for patients undergoing orthopedic procedures. Patients undergoing elective hip or knee joint replacement were enrolled in the study (n = 105). Sensory blockade was established preoperatively with 10-15 mL of 0.75% levobupivacaine. Patients were then randomized to receive 0.0625%, 0.125%, or 0.25% levobupivacaine as a continuous epidural infusion at 6 mL/h for 24 h. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was given as rescue analgesia, and time to first request for analgesia and total dose of morphine consumed were recorded. Sensory blockade, motor blockade, visual analog scale pain score, and cardiovascular variables were also recorded at regular intervals postoperatively. Ninety-one patients were included in the primary intent-to-treat analysis. Total normalized dose of morphine, number of patient-controlled analgesia requests, and overall postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were significantly lower for the 0.25% group compared with the other two groups, and the time to first request for rescue analgesia was longer. There was no significant difference between the 0.125% and 0.25% groups in terms of maximum motor blockade achieved and time to minimal motor blockade. Safety data were equivalent among the three groups. We conclude that levobupivacaine as a continuous epidural infusion provided adequate postoperative analgesia and that the 0.25% concentration provided significantly longer analgesia than 0.125% or 0.0625% levobupivacaine without any significant increase in detectable motor blockade relative to the 0.125% group. IMPLICATIONS Postoperative epidural infusion of levobupivacaine can provide safe and effective analgesia for patients having hip or knee joint replacement. Of the three concentrations we infused at a constant rate, 0.25% provided significantly better pain relief.

[1]  M. Checketts,et al.  Comparison of S(-)-bupivacaine with racemic (RS)-bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  B. Veering,et al.  Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. , 1998 .

[3]  B. Veering,et al.  Cardiovascular and Central Nervous System Effects of Intravenous Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Sheep , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  J. Bannister,et al.  Extradural S(-)-bupivacaine: comparison with racemic RS-bupivacaine. , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  E. Crosby,et al.  Continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine for the prevention of postoperative pain after major orthopaedic surgery: a dose-finding study , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[6]  R. Wheatley,et al.  Extradural infusion analgesia for postoperative pain relief. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Rw Gristwood.  Meeting Highlights: Meeting of the British Pharmacological Society 5 - 7 January 1994, London, UK , 1994 .

[8]  K. Samii,et al.  Myocardial uptake of bupivacaine: II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bupivacaine enantiomers in the isolated perfused rabbit heart. , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  D. Cooper,et al.  Patient-controlled extradural analgesia to compare bupivacaine, fentanyl and bupivacaine with fentanyl in the treatment of postoperative pain. , 1993, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  J. Moore,et al.  Extradural clonidine infusions for analgesia after total hip replacement. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  M. Behbehani,et al.  Enantiomer-Specific Effects of an Intravenously Administered Arrhythmogenic Dose of Bupivacaine on Neurons of the Nucleus Tractus Solitarius and the Cardiovascular System in the Anesthetized Rat , 1992, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[12]  J. Modig,et al.  Intra- and post-operative blood loss and haemodynamics in total hip replacement when performed under lumbar epidural versus general anaesthesia. , 1987, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[13]  D. Denson,et al.  Comparison of Continuous Epidural Infusion of a Local Anesthetic and Administration of Systemic Narcotics in the Management of Pain after Total Knee Replacement Surgery , 1987, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  M. Heath.  Deaths after intravenous regional anaesthesia. , 1982, British medical journal.

[15]  G A Albright,et al.  Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. , 1979, Anesthesiology.